I know this has been discussed many times from what I've read, but I can't seem to find a complete answer with respect to my specific questions/setup I'm planning.
I am planning on a coilover + UCA setup, with either KINGs or extended-travel Fox (rr on either), and eventually spindles. Since I'm not planning on going to LT anytime remotely soon (or ever), I would like to get the most travel out of the suspension as possible, while maintaining alignment.
So, my questions are: Which of these setups listed below do you think are most reasonable for what I'm going for? How much travel would each one allow, would any of them have alignment problems (not being able to be properly aligned), or any having problems with rubbing (coils on the UCAs, I'm not planning on any crazy tires or anything)?
The options I'm trying to decide between are:
-Camburg UCAs + KINGs
-Camburg UCAs + extended-travel Fox's
-TC UCAs + KINGs
-TC UCAs + extended-travel Fox's
I've read that Camburgs will allow for slightly more travel, but may not allow for proper alignment (the latter may only be for the older, 1" uniball version?). If the extra travel is true, will going with KINGs or Fox's give the same amount of travel?
Thanks very much to anyone who can help. Going a decent bit (to me!) of money on this, so I want to make sure that I get the best setup with the least amount of problems that I can.