1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

2010 Tacoma AC I4 2WD VS. 2013 Tacoma AC I4 4WD $10,000 difference..

Discussion in '4 Cylinder' started by netuser08, Mar 24, 2013.

  1. Mar 24, 2013 at 5:43 PM
    #1
    netuser08

    netuser08 [OP] New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2013
    Member:
    #100477
    Messages:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    Hello,

    I am a new member to Tacoma World (Great site)

    I am currently in the market for Tacoma and I am torn between 2 Tacomas below:

    1. 2010 Tacoma Access Cab I4 2WD MT $16,000.

    2. 2013 Tacoma Access Cab I4 4WD MT $26,000.

    it's approx. $10,000 difference (new/old & 2WD/4WD)

    I don't do much off roading, but I have to deal with snow & slate on some winters (South). I need to haul a motorcycle, small boat or a riding lawn mower.

    Which one would be better? 4WD worth $10,000?

    Needing your expert advice.

    Thank you!
     
  2. Mar 24, 2013 at 5:49 PM
    #2
    rickmeseke

    rickmeseke subaru of america

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2012
    Member:
    #90811
    Messages:
    963
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ricky
    Brunswick, GA
    Vehicle:
    a white truck
    why not find a 2010 or older 4wd?
     
  3. Mar 24, 2013 at 5:55 PM
    #3
    KenLyns

    KenLyns 8.75" Third Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2010
    Member:
    #37674
    Messages:
    29,365
    Gender:
    Male
    Belly of the Beast
    Vehicle:
    4x4 TRD Off-Road Full-Auto
    LED Headlights, Volant CAI, 32" Duratracs
    A word of warning: I4 Access Cab 4WD will be a pig. Others here may say it's fine, but it has the worst weight-to-power ratio of any vehicle in Toyota's lineup, worse than the Prius and the 3-cyl Scion iQ.

    I'd try to find a 2010 (or even 2009) V6 4WD (basically what I'm driving :D). If you have to deal with any snow, 4WD will make a big difference.
     
  4. Mar 24, 2013 at 7:05 PM
    #4
    jassco

    jassco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Member:
    #20568
    Messages:
    618
    Gender:
    Male
    NH
    Vehicle:
    2023 TRD Offroad
    From experience - with hauling anything I can't really recommend the AC 4 in either configuration, but if had to choose the 2wd is more bang for the buck there. The auto will be hunting a lot. The 4 is just more responsive with a manual, but that rules out hauling anything. You may be better off spending $20k on a older v6.
     
  5. Mar 24, 2013 at 7:18 PM
    #5
    azreb

    azreb Geezer

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Member:
    #74430
    Messages:
    1,025
    Gender:
    Male
    TN
    Vehicle:
    '20 SR5 crew cab; gray
    camper shell, front camera, floor mats, cheap bed mat, dash camera, catalytic converter cover, fumoto
    I think he specified both were manual transmissions.

    KenLyns--That picture in your signature line makes your posts hard to read. :) I respectfully take exception to your statement about the 4wd 4-banger AC being a pig. It won't win many drag races, but mine moves alright in traffic. It has been quite reliable and economical to drive. The mpgs are much better than what V6 owners are reporting.

    OP--if I were in your shoes, I'd opt for the 2wd for the use you describe.
     
  6. Mar 25, 2013 at 3:34 PM
    #6
    rkpezzi

    rkpezzi New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2013
    Member:
    #98733
    Messages:
    1
    Gender:
    Male
    Leelanau County, MI
    Vehicle:
    2013 Ext. Cab 2.7L
    That's pretty much my experience. I've got a 2013 4WD Access Cab with the 2.7 and automatic transmission and it's fine. No question the V6 has way more power, but I don't really need to set 0-60 records with my truck.

    If you're towing a lot, or spend a lot of time going up steep hills into headwinds, you would probably find the V6 absolutely necessary. Other than that, it's just a matter of personal preference (and a few thousand dollars).

    Heck, I think the 2.7L has probably made me a slightly better driver. I've learned to sigh and relax rather than blasting around every idiot on the road.
     
  7. Mar 25, 2013 at 6:15 PM
    #7
    netuser08

    netuser08 [OP] New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2013
    Member:
    #100477
    Messages:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    Thank you for all your advice. I will post pics after this weekend!

    I am leaning toward the 4 CYCL. but we will see after my test drive. :D
     

Products Discussed in

To Top