1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

need better audio

Discussion in 'Audio & Video' started by sbg2014, Dec 7, 2011.

  1. Dec 12, 2011 at 9:35 AM
    #41
    Cinco

    Cinco Team no taco

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Member:
    #60442
    Messages:
    1,602
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jose
    Rio Rancho,NM
    Vehicle:
    2012 Civic Ex Coupe
    :rofl:
     
  2. Dec 12, 2011 at 10:12 AM
    #42
    XJBaylor

    XJBaylor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2010
    Member:
    #43621
    Messages:
    175
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Keith
    Plano, TX
    Vehicle:
    06 DCLB TRD Sport 4x4
    King coilovers with remote reservoirs, Deaver 12 leaf pack with 5100's, TRD exhaust, Kenwood 6160, Anthracite Sport Wheels
    This. This could possibly be done with a simple "speaker kit" from Dynamat, or you could easily order a small amount of product from sounddeadenershowdown.com or raamaudio.com. Sealing the doors can be done easily with extruded butyl rope and aluminum sheeting or plexiglass. There are plenty of options, and the "ROI" is high on deadening when done intelligently and within reason.
     
  3. Dec 12, 2011 at 11:59 AM
    #43
    06SR5canada

    06SR5canada Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Member:
    #60338
    Messages:
    646
    Gender:
    Male
    Saskatchewan
    Vehicle:
    06 dblcab SR5
    2ndary air filter removed, flowmaster 40
    I doubt going from a 6.5 to a 6x9 would even be audible to someone that is not an enthusiast or has super hearing. And yes a sundown amp would cure his bass dilemma since adding more power would be more effective than adding .98356 square inches of cone area
     
  4. Dec 12, 2011 at 12:56 PM
    #44
    XJBaylor

    XJBaylor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2010
    Member:
    #43621
    Messages:
    175
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Keith
    Plano, TX
    Vehicle:
    06 DCLB TRD Sport 4x4
    King coilovers with remote reservoirs, Deaver 12 leaf pack with 5100's, TRD exhaust, Kenwood 6160, Anthracite Sport Wheels
    Good job, an additional $300+ dollars sunk into an amp would sound better than a lateral move to a different speaker.

    And stop treating the difference between a 6.5" and 6x9 as mere semantics. The difference in surface area is 9 sq in. or roughly 33% more. A 6x9 is closer in surface area to an 8" speaker than a 6.5" speaker.
     
  5. Dec 12, 2011 at 3:06 PM
    #45
    lbridges

    lbridges Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2011
    Member:
    #52434
    Messages:
    403
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Lee
    Indialantic, FL
    Vehicle:
    '11 PreRunner SR5
    If one believes Hertz Audio (I do), the difference in efficiency for the same model line between 6.5" and 6X9" speakers is 2 dB per speaker with the same power applied. This inference is from their current online catalog and applies to multiple models.

    A calculation [ten times the log of the ratios of power] implies a 4 dB change in output requires about 2.5 times the power from an amp.

    Using the Hertz data, two 6X9s vice two 6.5" speakers from the same OEM and model line would produce the same 4 dB SPL difference with zero change to the amp power levels.

    The real problem (IMO) is that few good speaker companies produce 6X9 speakers. Hertz does, and Hybrid Audio Technology does/did -- not sure who else.

    Caveat: This applies only to those frequencies being sent to the 6X9 part of the speaker, not the tweeter.
     
  6. Dec 12, 2011 at 3:52 PM
    #46
    XJBaylor

    XJBaylor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2010
    Member:
    #43621
    Messages:
    175
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Keith
    Plano, TX
    Vehicle:
    06 DCLB TRD Sport 4x4
    King coilovers with remote reservoirs, Deaver 12 leaf pack with 5100's, TRD exhaust, Kenwood 6160, Anthracite Sport Wheels
    Image Dynamics still makes a good 6x9 driver. I have the Eclipse SC6900 component set and it is great for the price you can still snag them for. I am not perfectly happy with my setup, but I still need to deaden my doors and finish my sub install, so I don't want to judge the speaker until I get the install completed.
     
  7. Dec 13, 2011 at 9:21 AM
    #47
    06SR5canada

    06SR5canada Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Member:
    #60338
    Messages:
    646
    Gender:
    Male
    Saskatchewan
    Vehicle:
    06 dblcab SR5
    2ndary air filter removed, flowmaster 40
    How does the size of a speaker determine what frequencies it will reproduce? An 8 inch will hit all the same notes an 18 will so saying something will play lower is misinformation. Sure it will be louder, but will still play the same frequencies.

    If oval speakers were good im sure there would be alot more in production. And most of them are coax's which are great if you like shitty sounding music
     
  8. Dec 13, 2011 at 9:43 AM
    #48
    XJBaylor

    XJBaylor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2010
    Member:
    #43621
    Messages:
    175
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Keith
    Plano, TX
    Vehicle:
    06 DCLB TRD Sport 4x4
    King coilovers with remote reservoirs, Deaver 12 leaf pack with 5100's, TRD exhaust, Kenwood 6160, Anthracite Sport Wheels
    Please note that my exact words were "lower with more authority" aka will play the low notes louder. What good is a speaker that is reproducing low frequencies if it is doing so at a volume so low it can't be heard?

    Oval speakers are not made by the high end companies in mass because the end user of, say, a Dynaudio speaker is likely not just filling in the hole the stock speaker came out of. They will build an adapter plate to fit the exact speaker they want. Be it a 6.5, 7, or 8, they have options other than buying a 6x9. The OP probably does not intend to trim a lot of sheet metal to squeeze in an 8" midbass.

    If you really believe that a coaxial arrangement automatically equals poor sound you really understand even less about car audio than I do. And that is saying something.
     
  9. Dec 13, 2011 at 10:15 AM
    #49
    06SR5canada

    06SR5canada Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Member:
    #60338
    Messages:
    646
    Gender:
    Male
    Saskatchewan
    Vehicle:
    06 dblcab SR5
    2ndary air filter removed, flowmaster 40
    Poor sound is purely subjective ass wipe and tweeters getting the same signal as the mid means shhiiiit
     
  10. Dec 13, 2011 at 12:58 PM
    #50
    XJBaylor

    XJBaylor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2010
    Member:
    #43621
    Messages:
    175
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Keith
    Plano, TX
    Vehicle:
    06 DCLB TRD Sport 4x4
    King coilovers with remote reservoirs, Deaver 12 leaf pack with 5100's, TRD exhaust, Kenwood 6160, Anthracite Sport Wheels
    I am just going to ignore the childish name calling.

    I was under the impression that most coaxial speakers used a capacitor as a 1st order crossover. Sure the crossovers aren't necessarily as high quality as those in your average passive component setup, but they aren't allowing sub bass frequencies to hit the tweeter if that is the impression you were under.

    Beyond that, there are coaxial speakers that can be run active and coaxial speakers with external passive crossovers. By your simple definition Focal 165KRC speakers suck, simply because the mid and tweeter are mounted together.
     
  11. Dec 15, 2011 at 10:18 AM
    #51
    JStradaXR

    JStradaXR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Member:
    #45384
    Messages:
    1,283
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Chuy
    Ontario CALI
    Vehicle:
    06 X Rated
    Everything but boost =[
    I agree no need for name calling.... And to settle all this who cares about cone size and bla bla bla.... If you like the sound who cares, your the one that's going to be hearing it
     
  12. Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 PM
    #52
    mattg43

    mattg43 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2011
    Member:
    #51640
    Messages:
    845
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Matt
    Texas
    Vehicle:
    08 Prerunner SR5 DC
    SwingCase, driver side. PVC Bike rack. Aftermarket stereo.
    Common misconception that 06SR5 is making, along with tons of those who dont really pay attention to higher end audio. A "Coax" to the general car audio world simply means tweets/super tweets on top of a mid. Many of these have no crossover, or a simple 1st order to keep some bass from the tweets.

    In these cases, your component "systems" are better as they have a much better (while still a "universal") crossover, and the ability to place in better locations to adjust certain aspects of the install.

    Keith is referring to something like the ID XS series, and the Polk SR series components that allow the tweeter to be mounted in place of the phase plug (or over it, as in the Aura Braxial speaker line) for a co-axial mounting with much better results. There are some very real sonic benefits of a coaixial or point source driver. There are also reasons that baffle design, and speaker placement, is very important in home audio speakers.

    Then you can get into some pretty nice drivers, like those found in KEF home audio stuff, or something like this Seas (that is a derivative of the KEF driver in their home speakers).

    Please do not confuse a good point source or co-ax driver with the low end stuff you are used to hearing.

    JStrada brings up a solid point, but keep in mind that the OP asked about what would work better in a certain situation. While some want to argue semantics (like a 3" driver will play 30hz as well, just not as loud) they are bypassing the simple fact that audio is a function of air movement, and bass is directly related to this. Excursion or cone area are the important factors here. This is not an engine, where you can "turbocharge" the driver, to make up displacement.

    With bass, there is no replacement for displacement. You can certainly optimize an enclosure for a driver and achieve outstanding results from a small driver (6.5" subs, anyone!? or 8" drivers hitting 150db!) but that is not an issue here.
     
  13. Dec 16, 2011 at 4:55 PM
    #53
    Madjik_Man

    Madjik_Man The Rembrandt of Rattle Can

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Member:
    #26893
    Messages:
    19,194
    Gender:
    Male
    Colorado Front Range
    Vehicle:
    1998 Ext Cab 3.4 4x4 TRD 5MT, 2004 DC 3.4 4x4 TRD
    To the OP... audio is all subjective. Go listen to components that fit your budget and what ever sounds best to you, is what is best for you.

    See what this thread turned into? A dick waving contest.

    Point is: There will always be those who want to get into a dick waving contest. And truth be told, they may have a bigger cock than you. But it doesn't matter, because in the end it's all about how your own dick feels in your own hand.
     
  14. Dec 16, 2011 at 5:06 PM
    #54
    Casey05Taco

    Casey05Taco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Member:
    #8781
    Messages:
    1,985
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Casey
    Penngrove, CA
    Vehicle:
    05 Tacoma Prerunner
    trd seat covers, bed mat, tinted windows, debadged, mud flaps removed, tinted tails, blacked out center console, Black Rims, 6000k HID in highs and fogs, blacked out front emblem, Pioneer AVH-4300DVD, Gauge Cluster, lower valence, retrofitted, audio system, Maxtrac Spindles, Billies
    I might be getting into contact with you about a new amp if this one i have shits the bed. :spy:

     

Products Discussed in

To Top