1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

box movement

Discussion in 'General Automotive' started by slo2sixty, Nov 13, 2008.

  1. Nov 13, 2008 at 12:40 PM
    #1
    slo2sixty

    slo2sixty [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Member:
    #10389
    Messages:
    361
    Gender:
    Male
    Syracuse, NY
    Vehicle:
    19 cement DCSB TRD offroad
  2. Nov 13, 2008 at 12:45 PM
    #2
    mws4ua

    mws4ua I'll try being nicer if you try being smarter.

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Member:
    #6624
    Messages:
    7,688
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Matt
    Birmingham
    Vehicle:
    2018 GMC Sierra SLT Z71 4x4... Yeah yeah, I know.
    Holy Crap!!!!

    How would a Tacoma do in this test, I wonder. Looks like the Ford really kicked ass at that particular test.
     
  3. Nov 13, 2008 at 12:58 PM
    #3
    slo2sixty

    slo2sixty [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Member:
    #10389
    Messages:
    361
    Gender:
    Male
    Syracuse, NY
    Vehicle:
    19 cement DCSB TRD offroad
    i about s*** when i saw that... I wonder how a taco would do. Sombody make there own test and let us see it hahaha
     
  4. Nov 17, 2008 at 2:04 PM
    #4
    RelentlessFab

    RelentlessFab Eric @Relentless Fab Vendor

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2008
    Member:
    #4772
    Messages:
    15,719
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Eric
    Sparks, NV
    Vehicle:
    07 AC 6mt>03 SR5 >08 Sport and 17 6MT TRD OR
    Relentless Armored! Too many others to list.
    wow! Tundra's bed looks like its about to rattle right off the truck! Too bad i dont like Ford......
     
  5. Nov 17, 2008 at 3:26 PM
    #5
    RoyB

    RoyB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Member:
    #9708
    Messages:
    1,645
    Gender:
    Male
    Chicago burbs
    Vehicle:
    '09 TRD DC Sport
    i believe this test was done by ford if that has any bearing.
     
  6. Nov 17, 2008 at 3:49 PM
    #6
    chris4x4

    chris4x4 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    Member:
    #6497
    Messages:
    112,751,526
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    FlimFlubberJAM
    Tenoe, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2019 Rubicon 4 Door,
    4.10 gears, sliders, and lots of buttons.
    If you time the bumps it seems the Ford was in fact run at a slower speed. That Tundra was CRAZY!
     
  7. Nov 17, 2008 at 4:00 PM
    #7
    petersharp

    petersharp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Member:
    #3566
    Messages:
    919
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Do you need to ask?! It's up there ^
    Louisville, CO
    Vehicle:
    Ex DC LB Sport owner.
    I've seen this before. It really made me want to buy a F150 ;)

    I think Ford designed a test that their truck would excel at then promoted it. I mean, who really drives in those conditions at that speed? What a load of crap. Up next: the rear view mirror mounting bolt tensile test.

    I also saw a test (from Ford I think) where they suspended the truck from the bed tie-down eyes. Again, how useful is that? Not very. As long as they're strong enough to hold the maximum load in the bed (which is waaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyy less than the weight of the truck) then there's no advantage.
     
  8. Nov 17, 2008 at 6:37 PM
    #8
    350TacoZilla

    350TacoZilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Member:
    #2767
    Messages:
    1,119
    Gender:
    Male
    Hancock MD
    Vehicle:
    1997 3RZ 5spd 4x4 Reg Cab
    2.7L 3RZ,K&N filter, 4" deck plate mod,flowmaster 40 series,3" suspension lift, hybrid 52"chevy/toyota rear springs.
    one other thing that can make a huge difference in the ride like that is the placement of the bars-vs-wheelbase I have seen where you run extra cab over a suspension test and its horrible then run the same truck in reg cab for and double cab and they perform flawlessly... just the timing of it makes a huge difference IMHO
     
  9. Dec 2, 2008 at 11:46 AM
    #9
    sooner07

    sooner07 1/2 man 1/2 amazing

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2008
    Member:
    #4783
    Messages:
    1,417
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    A A Ron
    DFW, Texas
    Vehicle:
    Debadged 2008 Rugged Trail
    Toytec ultimate lift kit, light racing UCAs, ARB bumper and full skid plates underneath. Looking into redoing the suspension and maybe repainting the ol' Taco.
    It does appear that the test track was close the suspension's resonant frequency for the Tundra as compared to the other vehicles. That would give the test some bias towards the other vehicles, and if you slowed down or speed up the shaking would likely be dramaticly subdued. But it is still very interesting to see how they all reacted.

    On a side note, I recently had an accident in my Tacoma, so it has been in the shop. I got an '09 F-150 and have been nothing but impressed by it. The V8 gets remarkable more torque than the Taco and gets nearly the same MPG as the V6 Tacoma. Now, part of this is due to the Tacoma being a 4WD truck and the F-150 being 2WD.

    I do think the F-150 is a fantastic truck, both in the cab and under the hood. I am glad I bought the Tacoma as far as an investment (I know it will last me 200k miles plus, and at the end of 3 years it will be worth around 40% of retail where as the F-150 is lucky to get 25% retail at that point).
     

Products Discussed in

To Top