1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Jerry Can Origins - The Little Can That Could

Discussion in 'Off-Topic Discussion' started by JohnnyWayne, Apr 14, 2015.

  1. Apr 14, 2015 at 5:32 AM
    #1
    JohnnyWayne

    JohnnyWayne [OP] The Past Through Tomorrow

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2012
    Member:
    #71101
    Messages:
    368
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Johnny
    Lantana, FL
    Vehicle:
    '12 DCLB TRD Sport
    Look out for snakes in the grass guerrilla marketing.
    I was sent this by my father in law and just wanted to share it - if it has been posted before please accept my apologies (I know it's a wall of text, hope you find it interesting):


    THE LITTLE CAN THAT COULD

    During World War II the United States exported more tons of petroleum
    products than of all other war matériel combined. The mainstay of the
    enormous
    oil-andgasoline transportation network that fed the war was the oceangoing
    tanker, supplemented on land by pipelines, railroad tank cars, and trucks.
    But for combat vehicles on the move, another link was crucial--smaller
    containers that could be carried and poured by hand and moved around a
    battle
    zone by trucks.

    Hitler knew this. He perceived early on that the weakest link in his plans
    for blitzkrieg using his panzer divisions was fuel supply. He ordered his
    staff to design a fuel container that would minimize gasoline losses under
    combat conditions. As a result the German army had thousands of jerrycans,
    as they came to be called, stored and ready when hostilities began in 1939.

    The jerrycan had been developed under the strictest secrecy, and its
    unique features were many. It was flat-sided and rectangular in shape,
    consisting of two halves welded together as in a typical automobile
    gasoline tank.
    It had three handles, enabling one man to carry two cans and pass one to
    another man in bucket-brigade fashion. Its capacity was approximately five
    U.S. gallons; its weight filled, forty-five pounds. Thanks to an air
    chamber
    at the top, it would float on water if dropped overboard or from a plane.
    Its short spout was secured with a snap closure that could be propped open
    for pouring, making unnecessary any funnel or opener. A gasket made the
    mouth
    leakproof. An air-breathing tube from the spout to the air space kept the
    pouring smooth. And most important, the can's inside was lined with an
    impervious plastic material developed for the insides of steel beer barrels.
    This enabled the jerrycan to be used alternately for gasoline and water.

    Early in the summer of 1939, this secret weapon began a roundabout odyssey
    into American hands. An American engineer named Paul Pleiss, finishing up
    a manufacturing job in Berlin, persuaded a German colleague to join him on
    a vacation trip overland to India. The two bought an automobile chassis and
    built a body for it. As they prepared to leave on their journey, they
    realized that they had no provision for emergency water. The German engineer
    knew of and had access to thousands of jerrycans stored at Tempelhof
    Airport. He simply took three and mounted them on the underside of the car.

    The two drove across eleven national borders without incident and were
    halfway across India when Field Marshal Goering sent a plane to take the
    German engineer back home. Before departing, the engineer compounded
    his treason
    by giving Pleiss complete specifications for the jerrycan's manufacture.
    Pleiss continued on alone to Calcutta. Then he put the car in storage and
    returned to Philadelphia.

    Back in the United States, Pleiss told military officials about the
    container, but without a sample can he could stir no interest, even
    though the
    war was now well under way. The risk involved in having the cans
    removed from
    the car and shipped from Calcutta seemed too great, so he eventually had
    the complete vehicle sent to him, via Turkey and the Cape of Good Hope. It
    arrived in New York in the summer of 1940 with the three jerrycans intact.
    Pleiss immediately sent one of the cans to Washington. The War Department
    looked at it but unwisely decided that an updated version of their World War
    I container would be good enough. That was a cylindrical ten-gallon can
    with two screw closures. It required a wrench and a funnel for pouring.

    That one jerrycan in the Army's possession was later sent to Camp
    Holabird, in Maryland. There it was poorly redesigned; the only
    features retained
    were the size, shape, and handles. The welded circumferential joint was
    replaced with rolled seams around the bottom and one side. Both a wrench
    and a
    funnel were required for its use. And it now had no lining. As any
    petroleum engineer knows, it is unsafe to store gasoline in a container with
    rolled seams. This ersatz can did not win wide acceptance.

    The British first encountered the jerrycan during the German invasion of
    Norway, in 1940, and gave it its English name (the Germans were, of course,
    the "Jerries"). Later that year Pleiss was in London and was asked by
    British officers if he knew anything about the can's design and
    manufacture. He
    ordered the second of his three jerrycans flown to London. Steps were
    taken to manufacture exact duplicates of it.

    Two years later the United States was still oblivious of the can. Then, in
    September 1942, two quality-control officers posted to American refineries
    in the Mideast ran smack into the problems being created by ignoring the
    jerrycan. I was one of those two. Passing through Cairo two weeks before
    the start of the Battle of El Alamein, we learned that the British wanted no
    part of a planned U.S. Navy can; as far as they were concerned, the only
    container worth having was the Jerrycan, even though their only supply was
    those captured in battle. The British were bitter; two years after the
    invasion of Norway there was still no evidence that their government had
    done
    anything about the jerrycan.

    My colleague and I learned quickly about the jerrycan's advantages and the
    Allied can's costly disadvantages, and we sent a cable to naval officials
    in Washington stating that 40 percent of all the gasoline sent to Egypt was
    being lost through spillage and evaporation. We added that a detailed
    report would follow. The 40 percent figure was actually a guess intended to
    provoke alarm, but it worked. A cable came back immediately requesting
    confirmation.

    We then arranged a visit to several fuel-handling depots at the rear of
    Montgomery's army and found there that conditions were indeed appalling.
    Fuel arrived by rail from the sea in fifty-five-gallon steel drums with
    rolled
    seams and friction-sealed metallic mouths. The drums were handled
    violently by local laborers. Many leaked. The next link in the chain was the
    infamous five-gallon "petrol tin." This was a square can of tin plate
    that had
    been used for decades to supply lamp kerosene. It was hardly useful for
    gasoline. In the hot desert sun, it tended to swell up, burst at the
    seams, and
    leak. Since a funnel was needed for pouring, spillage was also a problem.

    Allied soldiers in Africa knew that the only gasoline container worth
    having was German. Similar tins were carried on Liberator bombers in
    flight.
    They leaked out perhaps a third of the fuel they carried. Because of this,
    General Wavell's defeat of the Italians in North Africa in 1940 had come to
    naught. His planes and combat vehicles had literally run out of gas.
    Likewise in 1941, General Auchinleck's victory over Rommel had
    withered away. In
    1942 General Montgomery saw to it that he had enough supplies, including
    gasoline, to whip Rommel in spite of terrific wastage. And he was helped by
    captured jerrycans.

    The British historian Desmond Young later confirmed the great importance
    of oil cans in the early African part of the war. "No one who did not serve
    in the desert," he wrote, "can realise to what extent the difference
    between complete and partial success rested on the simplest item of our
    equipment--and the worst. Whoever sent our troops into desert warfare
    with the
    [five-gallon] petrol tin has much to answer for. General Auchinleck
    estimates
    that this 'flimsy and ill constructed container' led to the loss of thirty
    per cent of petrol between base and consumer. ... The overall loss was
    almost
    incalculable. To calculate the tanks destroyed, the number of men who were
    killed or went into captivity because of shortage of petrol at some
    crucial moment, the ships and merchant seamen lost in carrying it,
    would be quite
    impossible."

    After my colleague and I made our report, a new five-gallon container
    under consideration in Washington was canceled. Meanwhile the British were
    finally gearing up for mass production. Two million British jerrycans were
    sent to North Africa in early 1943, and by early 1944 they were being
    manufactured in the Middle East. Since the British had such a head
    start, the
    Allies agreed to let them produce all the cans needed for the invasion of
    Europe. Millions were ready by D-day. By V-E day some twenty-one
    million Allied
    jerrycans had been scattered all over Europe. President Roosevelt observed
    in November 1944, "Without these cans it would have been impossible for our
    armies to cut their way across France at a lightning pace which exceeded
    the German Blitz of 1940."

    In Washington little about the jerrycan appears in the official record. A
    military report says simply, "A sample of the jerry can was brought to the
    office of the Quartermaster General in the summer of 1940."

    Richard M. Daniel is a retired commander in the U.S. Naval Reserve and a
    chemical engineer.
     
  2. Apr 14, 2015 at 5:51 AM
    #2
    taczilla

    taczilla I intend to live forever; so far.... so good!

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Member:
    #82874
    Messages:
    8,485
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Marc
    PEC, Ontario, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2016 RAM Rebel
    2012 TRD Sport - STOLEN! / 2016 RAM Rebel
    Ahhh.... 'Jerry" can, now I get it.

    Cool!
     
  3. Apr 21, 2015 at 3:42 AM
    #3
    Hardscrabble

    Hardscrabble Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Member:
    #50838
    Messages:
    3,303
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Scott
    McDonough, GA
    Vehicle:
    ‘20 Sport M/T AC 4WD & '15 TRDOR DCSB 4WD
    A little of this and a little of that.
    Thanks for posting this. I've heard bits & pieces of the 'jerry-can' story over the years.
     
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2015

Products Discussed in

To Top