what do you guys like better? camburg "ball Joint" or LR UCA's?

what do you think? both are about the same $$.

or should i just do the uniball stuff? i did put some uniball equipment on another car. the added noise was a jagged pill to swallow.

no hard core wheeling. just using the truck to get me back into some very remote places.

 

I would get the light racing over the camburg uca's that utilize the stock joints, but would definitely get tc over all.

 

Blue loc-tite + 120 ft lbs = no issues to date with mine, i've never heard of anyone having issues with them getting out of alignment.

Plus you can't beat 400 dollars shipped to the door!

 

Camburg for sure.

 

I think they're both great quality... the only thing that's gonna break on either brand is the balljoint and that ain't likely with your offroad expectations anyway.

I chose the Camburg b/j UCAs because it came down to :1. they look way cooler than the LRs IMO, and 2. I saved about $70 by reusing my stock b/js. Plus they are in the same family as my other suspension components; Camburg=SwayAway.

Either is a fine product, if you're having a shop install them the price is the same in the end.

For the average to pretty hard offroader/daily driver I suggest NOT to go uniball. The Uniball is the strongest most badass UCA design but they are overkill for most of us and require some maintenance whereas a balljoint doesn't need maint.

 

thanks guys. i helped install a set of LR's. wasnt that difficult.
thanks, now to figure how to sneak a set of UCA's past my wife.