1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

wooden car stand (cribbing) project

Discussion in '2nd Gen. Tacomas (2005-2015)' started by imom, Sep 8, 2015.

  1. Sep 8, 2015 at 7:53 PM
    #41
    imom

    imom [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Member:
    #150462
    Messages:
    728
    Gender:
    Male
    CAL
    Vehicle:
    2014 Regular Cab
    Nope...that's the beauty of these.... jack the vehicle up... and insert the wooden stands on the frame rails...if you want to protect it...use some rubber or hockey puck lightly higher than 2x4s and you're golden.

    If your car has pinched welds...use hockey pucks for sure...otherwise you can bend the weld areas not reinforced.
     
  2. Sep 8, 2015 at 7:56 PM
    #42
    AK Taco

    AK Taco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2012
    Member:
    #76924
    Messages:
    5,047
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    matt
    Anchorage, Ak
    Vehicle:
    chrome-free '99 sr5
    20% tint on all windows, Deckplate mod, satoshi-ish grille, blacked out and/or body matched emblems, rattle canned rims, red l.e.d. interior lights, bilstein 5100's and OME 881 coils , deaver 8 leaf pack, 1.5" lift shackle, alpine sound system, 55w HID lightforce 140 and 170 fogs
    But then the car is only lifted 13" off the ground which is a lot less than what my jack stands can do.. I'm not really seeing the benefit to these.. I've never had a jackstand be so in the way that I can't do my work just fine


    EDIT: not to mention I'm fairly sure my trucks frame is more than 13" off the ground to begin with
     
  3. Sep 8, 2015 at 8:01 PM
    #43
    Guerrilla

    Guerrilla L(.)(.)K@G(.)(.)Dz

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2013
    Member:
    #102807
    Messages:
    6,810
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    D. Cooley
    Coast to Coast
    Vehicle:
    El' Black 13 DCSB 4x4
    Stuff

    You're concerned about the designs you posted and structural stability. Why would it bother you if it would hold up a house? Wouldn't that be a good thing? haha. I HIGHLY doubt, if you used those there would be anything to worry about, I think you answered your own concern("Wouldn't I have to worry about the shearing force if these aren't glued together or screwed together?") by the opening statement , but no the tops would be together, the bottoms wouldn't shift... And the weight thing, again only the top pieces would be attached together, so actually it'd probably be easier to move around vs what you've put up, and like I said easier to store.. Four of what you posted is gonna take up a lot of room, if that doesn't matter then, OK.
    However I understand if you're trying to budget with the 2x4's. It was just an idea out of the box you've put up.

    You honestly don't need to be a structural engineer or architect to figure this out, although you've had some experienced people chime in on the topic.
     
  4. Sep 8, 2015 at 8:05 PM
    #44
    Guerrilla

    Guerrilla L(.)(.)K@G(.)(.)Dz

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2013
    Member:
    #102807
    Messages:
    6,810
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    D. Cooley
    Coast to Coast
    Vehicle:
    El' Black 13 DCSB 4x4
    Stuff
    Instead your truck. Don't want this.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  5. Sep 8, 2015 at 8:11 PM
    #45
    Guerrilla

    Guerrilla L(.)(.)K@G(.)(.)Dz

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2013
    Member:
    #102807
    Messages:
    6,810
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    D. Cooley
    Coast to Coast
    Vehicle:
    El' Black 13 DCSB 4x4
    Stuff
    I thought about that too, but then thought, he'd have to unbolt it if he wanted to have more room to store and not deal with the weight.
     
  6. Sep 8, 2015 at 8:44 PM
    #46
    OZ-T

    OZ-T I hate my neighbour

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2009
    Member:
    #27584
    Messages:
    50,587
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Peter North
    British Columbia
    Vehicle:
    Mag Grey 09 Trd Sport DCLB 4x4
    OME 885x , OME shocks and Dakars , Wheelers SuperBumps front and rear , 275/70/17 Hankook ATm , OEM bed mat , Weathertech digifit floor liners , Weathertech in-channel vents , headache rack , Leer 100RCC commercial canopy , TRD bedside decals removed , Devil Horns by Andres , HomerTaco Satoshi
    Say what ? I mean bolt each tower together
     
  7. Sep 8, 2015 at 9:39 PM
    #47
    imom

    imom [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Member:
    #150462
    Messages:
    728
    Gender:
    Male
    CAL
    Vehicle:
    2014 Regular Cab
    I think this thread is getting off topic. Oz and Doording was saying that I have to worry about later shear force. I was saying they are contradicting themselves. They say I need structural screws...sound advice if this is a house where there is earthquake, wind force, etc... but I was getting the to the point which I doubt many can answer is what are the lateral forces involve.

    I was looking for someone who is a TW member who happen to have experience tell me the numbers that make sense.

    BTW even though you joke about the person trapped under a file cabinent... if you notice...cribbing is used by firefighters. It's used to leverage the force away from the victim to get them out of harms way.

    The thread is moving away from informational and practical. 6x6 is heavy...

    I found this:

    http://www.awc.org/pdf/codes-standards/publications/design-aids/AWC-DA6-BeamFormulas-0710.pdf
    If you look at figure 24...this is what I am looking for.

    This website uses these formula for calculations.

    http://www.woodbin.com/calcs/sagulator/

    Seems like a 12" span which is more span than my design:

    notice that it's listed as KG instead of lbs...so either way... 1100 lbs is acceptable load. My span is 8.5"...so I a 2x4 or 2x6 can handle this load easy.
     
  8. Sep 8, 2015 at 9:43 PM
    #48
    OZ-T

    OZ-T I hate my neighbour

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2009
    Member:
    #27584
    Messages:
    50,587
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Peter North
    British Columbia
    Vehicle:
    Mag Grey 09 Trd Sport DCLB 4x4
    OME 885x , OME shocks and Dakars , Wheelers SuperBumps front and rear , 275/70/17 Hankook ATm , OEM bed mat , Weathertech digifit floor liners , Weathertech in-channel vents , headache rack , Leer 100RCC commercial canopy , TRD bedside decals removed , Devil Horns by Andres , HomerTaco Satoshi
    Good luck OP , post pics of your final build
     
    DoorDing and T4RFTMFW like this.
  9. Sep 9, 2015 at 12:32 AM
    #49
    imom

    imom [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Member:
    #150462
    Messages:
    728
    Gender:
    Male
    CAL
    Vehicle:
    2014 Regular Cab
    Salute you sir....for helping others and saving lives.
     
  10. Sep 9, 2015 at 7:26 AM
    #50
    Guerrilla

    Guerrilla L(.)(.)K@G(.)(.)Dz

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2013
    Member:
    #102807
    Messages:
    6,810
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    D. Cooley
    Coast to Coast
    Vehicle:
    El' Black 13 DCSB 4x4
    Stuff
    I completely aware in more ways than one the picture I posted was a training scenario, and that 4x4's/6x6's are used in rescue most time to stabilize a vehicle, be it a transfer truck or a Toyota Tacoma. It was intended as a little joke to, not that it was even funny.

    You're right I was part in taking your thread off topic. I saw another solution with the 4x's and mentioned it. I only tried to help, I mentioned in one of my earlier post a way that would work with 2x4's to help you gain a little height/strength. For one it's not ideal trying to explain things thru a forum.

    Either way, good luck be safe, hope you can get the answers you're looking for.
     
    DoorDing likes this.
  11. Sep 9, 2015 at 7:39 AM
    #51
    Guerrilla

    Guerrilla L(.)(.)K@G(.)(.)Dz

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2013
    Member:
    #102807
    Messages:
    6,810
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    D. Cooley
    Coast to Coast
    Vehicle:
    El' Black 13 DCSB 4x4
    Stuff
    I know. I was saying if he just attached the top boards (to address concern for any shifting at initial point of contact). The bottoms could be left loose. That way it'd would be easier to store if needed/wanted and lighter bc not together when moving. Where as if they were bolted together, they'd be a little more of a pain trying to store, that's all. With the 4x4's there really wouldn't be a need to attach bottoms, they wouldn't give or go anywhere, once the weight was on them.
     
  12. Sep 9, 2015 at 3:03 PM
    #52
    imom

    imom [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Member:
    #150462
    Messages:
    728
    Gender:
    Male
    CAL
    Vehicle:
    2014 Regular Cab
    Thanks for all the concerns...I have another question and I modified my design so it should be safe now. I have a choice between.

    GRK RSS14212HP RSS HandyPak 1/4 by 2-1/2-Inch
    or
    GRK RSS10212HP RSS HandyPak 10 by 2-1/2-Inch

    I think the 1/4 are larger than #10 screws...but is this too big for 2x4s...especially if the screw goes in the center of the wood?

    Here's a new drawing that should remove any concerns:


    The blue are the GRK RSS (not to be confused with ROUS (princess bride)) and the yellow are the GRK R4 screws (#9).

    So appreciate an answer so I can order.
     
  13. Sep 10, 2015 at 7:44 PM
    #53
    imom

    imom [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Member:
    #150462
    Messages:
    728
    Gender:
    Male
    CAL
    Vehicle:
    2014 Regular Cab
    GRK RSS14212HP RSS HandyPak 1/4 by 2-1/2-Inch should arrive tomorrow. I should be able to start cutting the 2x4s and 2x6s and start assembly. I hope the 1/4" diameter is not too big for the 1.5" width lumber. I did receive the GRK R4 screws...they are nice...I can see why they are pricey and seems worth the money. Thanks for the suggestion.

    Update I see the GRK R4 have an AVG ultimate load of 876 lbf for #9 screws. Given that there will be at least 4 screws row...I think these would be more than adequate for this project...but I already order the GRK RSS, so should be fairly stout, I also bought some band clamps secure the stand while it cures with titebond II.
     
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2015
  14. Sep 10, 2015 at 8:11 PM
    #54
    devkurf

    devkurf Member at Large

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2014
    Member:
    #121502
    Messages:
    912
    Gender:
    Male
    midwest
    Vehicle:
    2005
    If I was putting my truck on it, and getting under it, pushing and pulling on stuff, I'm doubling up on the 2x4's in the center.
     
  15. Sep 10, 2015 at 8:25 PM
    #55
    imom

    imom [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Member:
    #150462
    Messages:
    728
    Gender:
    Male
    CAL
    Vehicle:
    2014 Regular Cab
    If you look at the original picture example, there's no center support at all. The span is 9" at max... even in home construction, the spans are greater than 12" generally it's 14.5" apart if I remember. So I already have a center support there. I just wanted to know if the 1/4" screws are too big for 2x4/2x6 thickness.
     
  16. Sep 10, 2015 at 8:39 PM
    #56
    imom

    imom [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Member:
    #150462
    Messages:
    728
    Gender:
    Male
    CAL
    Vehicle:
    2014 Regular Cab
    I missed answering this one. My stock truck is 9" off the ground. While it's true your jack stands can go above 13"...can it go 21" or higher? And not get in your way? The idea is that these are wheel stands...you inserted under your wheel, so 9" + 13" gives me 21" of ground clearance under the truck. If you need these stands to sit on your frame rails to work on your brakes you can... So it's 13" off the ground while you work on the front or back wheels off.

    If your lifted truck is already and it's 13" off the ground... make a shorter wooden car stand or just stick 4x4 stacked and you also have more ground clearance to do what you need.
     
  17. Sep 10, 2015 at 11:35 PM
    #57
    steelhd

    steelhd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2013
    Member:
    #118650
    Messages:
    3,523
    Gender:
    Male
    Eastern WA
    Vehicle:
    2011 DCSB TRD OR
    Never in the history of the internet have so many words been written about a simple stack of cribbing. :)
     
  18. Sep 11, 2015 at 2:30 AM
    #58
    devkurf

    devkurf Member at Large

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2014
    Member:
    #121502
    Messages:
    912
    Gender:
    Male
    midwest
    Vehicle:
    2005
    True, but the wood is also stacked flat.
     
  19. Sep 11, 2015 at 2:32 AM
    #59
    DrFunker

    DrFunker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2014
    Member:
    #122158
    Messages:
    42,918
    :laugh:
     
  20. Sep 11, 2015 at 9:00 AM
    #60
    imom

    imom [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Member:
    #150462
    Messages:
    728
    Gender:
    Male
    CAL
    Vehicle:
    2014 Regular Cab
    If you think my design is radical... take a look at this link:

    http://www.clubwrx.net/forums/tutorials-diy/134366057-diy-wooden-wheel-stands.html

    Now regarding the flat part.... if you want to break something... which side do you think is weaker? the side that's 1.5" think or the side that 3.5" thick. Did you look at the sag calculator in the previous page?

    The only real advantage I see of stacking the 2x4's flat is that there's less chance of racking. It's also easier to add more height since you simply just add wood and screw from the top.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top