1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

king vs. icon vs. fox racing coilovers

Discussion in 'Suspension' started by SoCalTacos, Feb 10, 2012.

?

Coilover Preference?

  1. Fox Racing

    228 vote(s)
    25.1%
  2. Icon

    291 vote(s)
    32.0%
  3. King

    342 vote(s)
    37.6%
  4. ADS

    49 vote(s)
    5.4%
  1. Oct 27, 2015 at 7:30 PM
    #581
    TRVLR500

    TRVLR500 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2014
    Member:
    #137292
    Messages:
    1,093
    Gender:
    Male
    Wyoming
    Vehicle:
    Tacoma SR5 4X4 2.7 4CYL
    Well jberry?!!! What would you suggest for my future use per my previous post #619? You seem to know far more about this than I do or ever will and you might suggest exactly what I want and need because I certainly don't know exactly what I'm looking for as far as specs are concerned with a given set of shocks. Only what I want. That's why I posted what i posted so people like you would make some suggestions.
     
  2. Oct 27, 2015 at 7:34 PM
    #582
    TRVLR500

    TRVLR500 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2014
    Member:
    #137292
    Messages:
    1,093
    Gender:
    Male
    Wyoming
    Vehicle:
    Tacoma SR5 4X4 2.7 4CYL
    I had thought about the Billies since so many use them but I think the OME's would be a little better and since, for the time being I'm going to use OME front springs I'd like to keep everything the same as far as brand is concerned. With the exception of my rear leafs of course.
     
  3. Oct 27, 2015 at 7:34 PM
    #583
    Taco Suave

    Taco Suave Taco Fever

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2014
    Member:
    #136131
    Messages:
    708
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Griffin
    Oxnard
    Vehicle:
    2012 TRD Off Road
    Go fast stuff
    What exactly is it that you want out of your shocks? You never really said what you want.
     
    jberry813 likes this.
  4. Oct 27, 2015 at 7:43 PM
    #584
    TRVLR500

    TRVLR500 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2014
    Member:
    #137292
    Messages:
    1,093
    Gender:
    Male
    Wyoming
    Vehicle:
    Tacoma SR5 4X4 2.7 4CYL
    I thought I pretty much explained that in post #619. I want a non-jarring ride at 75 or 80 mph on rough pavement and I still want to be able to go trail riding on the weekends without getting beat to death. This is a daily driver but of course, I do go "exploring" on the weekends or camping. I just want the suspension to do what it is supposed to do. Keep the rubber on the ground and not beat me to death. I also don't haul anything heavy in it and if I do it won't be very often or for very far.
     
  5. Oct 27, 2015 at 8:30 PM
    #585
    jberry813

    jberry813 Professional Fluffer Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Member:
    #49636
    Messages:
    28,477
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jason
    Lake Tahoe
    Vehicle:
    2012 DCSB Sport
    ...too much shit to list.
    That helps. But how much do you want to spend? Full disclosure, I'm a shock snob. I gave up on non-tunable packaged shocks. Even my tow pig has quality shocks. I expect more out of shocks than the majority of the populous. If you have the coin to spend, you will not be unhappy with a set of OE Kings. Get a street valving with a 500-550 lb spring rate and it will suite your needs. It boils down to cost vs ride characteristics tho.

    BTW, @Taco Suave works at King. I assure you, he won't steer you wrong either.
     
    DoorDing likes this.
  6. Oct 27, 2015 at 8:41 PM
    #586
    TRVLR500

    TRVLR500 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2014
    Member:
    #137292
    Messages:
    1,093
    Gender:
    Male
    Wyoming
    Vehicle:
    Tacoma SR5 4X4 2.7 4CYL

    As I said in my earlier post I'll go with the OME for now and next summer go with the nice stuff. I won't have any problem dropping $2500-$3000 on the rear shocks and the front coil overs/strut set. I just want this short wheelbased Taco to ride as nice as possible out on the rough paved roads at 75+ mph and still handle the slow speed off road trail riding I do. I also tend to climb some rather steep stuff with 1' diameter rocks and smaller along with rock "ledges" sometimes 1' to 2' foot high (IMO) when I need to get over it. Nothing like the serious Rock Crawlers and hill climbers that I have seen pics of. This is a utility, DD vehicle. I'm just fed up with getting beat to death and having it jump around every time I hit a really rough patch of highway at 75 mph or a manhole cover at 25mph. That goes for how it handles the dirt roads I "explore" on. After about 10 miles I'm ready for rough pavement again and I don't run high speeds off road. 20 mph and I feel like I'm really hauling some ass. Then there is the washboard which I can't even stand 1 mile on right now. At 3 mph my teeth are knocked out and trying to "skip" over the washboard results in the rear end becoming the front end.
     
    Last edited: Oct 27, 2015
  7. Oct 27, 2015 at 8:46 PM
    #587
    SixthSnail

    SixthSnail I have no idea what I'm doing

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2014
    Member:
    #139599
    Messages:
    13,291
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Matt
    Los Angeles
    Vehicle:
    '14 Tacoma Sport
    See Build in Sig
    Mind explaining digress ice dampening to me? I'm trying to dial in my suspension.
     
  8. Oct 27, 2015 at 8:53 PM
    #588
    TRVLR500

    TRVLR500 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2014
    Member:
    #137292
    Messages:
    1,093
    Gender:
    Male
    Wyoming
    Vehicle:
    Tacoma SR5 4X4 2.7 4CYL
    I just recently moved from Utah to Wyoming but you are probably right.
     
  9. Oct 27, 2015 at 8:55 PM
    #589
    At The Helm

    At The Helm ATH Fab Vendor

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2015
    Member:
    #151787
    Messages:
    1,366
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Morgan
    Gardnerville, NV
    Vehicle:
    2015 AC 4x4 TRD OR & 2019 T4R
    Kings, TC UCAS, SCS SR8's, ATH bumpers
    @TRVLR500 esp since Kings are available in a non resi front coilover for the first gen, that probably the route I'd go if I were you. That's what I would have done if non resi's were available for the second gen. As Jberry said, ask for the street friendly/slow speed valving. Downsouth motorsports (Wheeler's @YotaDan might do it too, idk) will do the custom valving free one time with your purchase.
     
  10. Oct 27, 2015 at 8:56 PM
    #590
    TRVLR500

    TRVLR500 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2014
    Member:
    #137292
    Messages:
    1,093
    Gender:
    Male
    Wyoming
    Vehicle:
    Tacoma SR5 4X4 2.7 4CYL
    Digressive means the shock is stiffer at the very beginning of it's compression and compression damping lessens as the shock travels through it's stroke.. Progressive means the damping is lighter during the beginning of it's travel and stiffens as it goes through it's travel.
     
    YotaDan likes this.
  11. Oct 27, 2015 at 8:58 PM
    #591
    TRVLR500

    TRVLR500 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2014
    Member:
    #137292
    Messages:
    1,093
    Gender:
    Male
    Wyoming
    Vehicle:
    Tacoma SR5 4X4 2.7 4CYL
    Thank you, Helm. I'll check the prices on that.
     
  12. Oct 27, 2015 at 9:00 PM
    #592
    jberry813

    jberry813 Professional Fluffer Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Member:
    #49636
    Messages:
    28,477
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jason
    Lake Tahoe
    Vehicle:
    2012 DCSB Sport
    ...too much shit to list.
    Digresive and progressive dampening profiles literally has absofuckalootly nothing to do with the shaft/piston position. It's a shaft speed characteristic.
     
  13. Oct 27, 2015 at 9:05 PM
    #593
    TXTaco13

    TXTaco13 Taco/T4R Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2013
    Member:
    #111175
    Messages:
    6,936
    Gender:
    Male
    Dallas, Texas
    Vehicle:
    4TH GEN V8 4X4 T4R
    '83 CJ7 '19 MT 07
    Assuming you had a progressive shock with the slow speed valving, and a digressive shock with slow speed valving, which one would have better on road characteristics? (Quick maneuvering ability, and reducing body roll) Assuming both had 650# springs
     
  14. Oct 27, 2015 at 9:08 PM
    #594
    Sterdog

    Sterdog Offline

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2013
    Member:
    #113290
    Messages:
    18,435
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    I am Groot
    People's Democratic Republic of Canuckistan
    Vehicle:
    15 FoST
    This, but to a point. Once the Icon shock hits a certain point obviously the shock isn't going to go to zero dampening. From the way it was explained to me the Icon is digressive but on a logarithmic curve with a minimum point at which it is no longer digressive. Icon is known for great road manners and low speed whoops. I know guys who like them, but they have their drawbacks too.

    Personally, I've wanted Fox since I was a kid, so you know my bias lol.
     
  15. Oct 27, 2015 at 9:09 PM
    #595
    SixthSnail

    SixthSnail I have no idea what I'm doing

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2014
    Member:
    #139599
    Messages:
    13,291
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Matt
    Los Angeles
    Vehicle:
    '14 Tacoma Sport
    See Build in Sig
    So icon is better at slow speed?
     
  16. Oct 27, 2015 at 9:11 PM
    #596
    stumbles

    stumbles 1 eye

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Member:
    #136442
    Messages:
    4,391
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    bryan
    mesa
    Vehicle:
    2002 White Double Cab
    This sounds like it would suite what you are looking for.

    I think you would be happier skipping the OME and just going to Kings sooner.

     
  17. Oct 27, 2015 at 9:12 PM
    #597
    Sterdog

    Sterdog Offline

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2013
    Member:
    #113290
    Messages:
    18,435
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    I am Groot
    People's Democratic Republic of Canuckistan
    Vehicle:
    15 FoST
    Depends on the ride you like. To be honest better would be a matter of opinion. Personally I don't like the materials Icon uses in their shafts and I've heard nasty things about how open they are about sharing their pressure settings so I would prefer the Kings, ADS, or Fox shocks over Icon. Like I said, with the proper setup and tuning, any of those shocks will likely feel amazing to you. @jberry813 can probably tell the PSI from a ten foot drive, so I wouldn't say his feelings about specific shock nuances will directly apply to your own experience.

    That being said, his advice on pressures and what to buy for your needs is probably spot on.
     
  18. Oct 27, 2015 at 9:14 PM
    #598
    SixthSnail

    SixthSnail I have no idea what I'm doing

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2014
    Member:
    #139599
    Messages:
    13,291
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Matt
    Los Angeles
    Vehicle:
    '14 Tacoma Sport
    See Build in Sig
    I have billies and am getting icon rears next month. Just deciding what fronts to go with.
     
  19. Oct 27, 2015 at 9:16 PM
    #599
    jberry813

    jberry813 Professional Fluffer Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Member:
    #49636
    Messages:
    28,477
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jason
    Lake Tahoe
    Vehicle:
    2012 DCSB Sport
    ...too much shit to list.
    Uhhhg. It's not that simple.
    Let me put it differently. On all my track cars, I always ran a digressive dampening profile. But keep in mind, we're talking less than 3 inches of shaft travel. You would bottom out the shock if you didn't have that large initial dampening bite. Yes, absolutely, a digressive shock will help with body roll on day to day driving. But it's also nutt jarring on simple things like speed bumps, driveway dips, and cigarette butts. More importantly, the part I despise about digressive valving is the predictability. I personally suck with digressive shocks in an offroad truck. Granted I spend as much time offroad (if not more) than on road. So i picked something that works for me. There's no cookie cutter answer here. What works for one asshole doesn't work for the next. It's subjective. In addition, body roll isn't necessarily a bad thing. The body roll I get with my truck is completely predictable. I can pitch my truck's fat ass into a corner and the shocks stop exactly where they need to for me to make a flamboyant exit.
     
    Bookaroni, DistortedAxis and DoorDing like this.
  20. Oct 27, 2015 at 9:16 PM
    #600
    TXTaco13

    TXTaco13 Taco/T4R Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2013
    Member:
    #111175
    Messages:
    6,936
    Gender:
    Male
    Dallas, Texas
    Vehicle:
    4TH GEN V8 4X4 T4R
    '83 CJ7 '19 MT 07
    5100 fronts or 6112?
     
To Top