3.5 Hit or miss?

Thank you love the Pacific NW!

 

That was the whole conversation, the price in comparison to what you get, clearly reading and comprehension are not your strong points.

 

But its not a $40k truck as @DCLBTRDORFTMFW puts it.

 

No it wasn't, stop chamging the subject. whole conversation is comparing a 2nd Gen. to a 3rd gen. You and I paid nearly identical prices for ours (looks like mine was cheaper after the $350 referral), and they are roughly similar.

You're trying to compare your truck to one that has a 3k package on it and are complaining that the truck is shockingly 3k more than yours...and then where your argument really falls apart is when you try and add a phantom 3k more to that truck so it hits 40k, and then you say that 3rd gens as a whole are 40k trucks llllol.


Kindergarten logic

 

Once again using an outlier, as he clearly states that the scarcity there is driving the price. And guess what? It's not selling. Just like I can use the 48k second gen that was just posted up. 2nd gens = 50k according to you. That's crazy!

 

Again you are an idiot and make no sense. The point is the truck costs more with a sticker price close to $40k and that guys are paying close to MSRP and that you can get a similarly equipped fullsize for the same or less. Are you really that thick in the skull? You cant premise an argument on a deal you got that you still have yet to prove you got.

Here's a TRD Tundra for $38k

http://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/detail/648143765/overview/

 

You seriously don't get it do you. I'm using your selective logic to show how wrong you are. You're basing your argument on outliers, so I'm doing the same.

And yet you say I'm wrong for doing it, but you yourself are correct for doing it? It's funny how you see the flaws in your own logic only when I use it.

Seriously you need to go into politics man.

 

He's just making shit up to try and justify him paying 34k for a 15 when u and I paid the same for a 16. Just ignore him.

 

He used the word idiot, re read the posts

 

Your ignorance and immaturity right here. No justification here. My original post in here was how I test drove a 2015 F150 that was $41k and the 2016 Tacoma I test drove was $38k. You started saying ancient technology same price fallacies and then used your deal as a comparison, great you got a great deal congrats, but the point is the sticker/msrp on a 2nd gen is less than that of a 3rd gen, you cannot argue that fact.

 

My rs4 is my pride and joy. Wife drives the s4 mainly.

My dad has a 98 tacoma and Ranger. He's an alcoholic we don't talk much.

Thanks for asking tho.

 

My post.

 

Your original post

 

I never once have argued that fact. All I've been doing is arguing that a 3rd isn't a 40k truck as you insist on claiming.

 

But it is, sure its got more tech, but your argument that 3rd gens don't come close to $40k OTD is invalid. See here:

https://www.tacomaworld.com/threads...-on-the-new-2016.388976/page-39#post-10951210

And:

 

Kid you need to lear n how to lie better.

 

That was me trolling you, just like when I posted I had low oil pressure and it was just my gas light.

Don't believe everything you read on the internet BlueT. My gas light wasn't even on

 

Right

 

If u think I'd make a serious post about my dad being an alcoholic then I don't know what to say lol.

Guess I need to use sarcasm font for you.

 

There's a huge difference between "third gen is a 40k truck" and "some people paid high 30s for it".

I'll say it for a fourth time, you can't take a few individual data points and extrapolate a blanket statement for a statistical population. By your logic, we can say a 3rd gen is a 20k truck. Just check out all the 4 bangers!!