Wyoming B.S. Thread

Id rather just have both


On the topic of just cars in general..

was passed by a F type the other day...my..god



Fuckin sexy.

 

Exactly, it gets to be meh. Unless that's really your thing

 

I've yet to see one in person... I must live in a small town.

 

I guess...something like that.

Was delicious sounding too. Id be totally okay with one of those. Even just the V6 one.

 

Ive seen a few new jags in the Denver area but not a newer f-type. Theyre doing a good job lately imo. I like the xjr too.

 

We flew the UAV over Hudson and some of the worse flooded areas today. This is a snap of a printout of the initial processing. Easy to see which blocks are having a rough go.

 

Holy shit. That is crazy.

Pouring here right now. Cool thunder

 

I am curious if you are going to pursue the new federal license to continue to fly that thing commercially?

 

We have a 333 and are federally permitted plus we have a pilot who is the one in control. We're legit lots goes into commercial flights of this thing. We've had some flights near DIA that were a bit nerve racking given we were within 25' of class b airspace.

 

I am not familiar with '333', is that a state or local licence?

I asked about this because the feds are this close to releasing new rules and licensing requirements that I think will supercede all that has gone before. Altho the main purpose is the get some control over the amateur use of drones, the new stuff will also impact the commercial operators.

Our business is publication of training materials for FAA knowledge exams. This is opening up a whole new area with potentially many new customers.

 

Yea there is alot changing fast.

It is a federal section 333 exemption. But since we have a pilot that exemption is essentially a mute point. We always notify airports that are within the required notification zones and take some pride in being one of the only commercial operators in the area who aren't just flying as they please... We like the FAA and want to stay in good relations.

 

May or may not have gotten a price on some tires and wheels yesterday after work excited to shred the gnar this summer

 

Verify the rear ubolts are torqued to the correct spec. If they are loose, it could allow the axle to move a little.

Also, get them to clarify what the 0.4* number is for. They can measure Toe, Camber and Thrust Angle on the rear. It is most likely Thrust Angle. FWIW, the thrust angle on my truck (alignment completed this past Saturday) is -0.07*

I attached a PDF of the final results on mine for reference.

 

I doubt it.

 

I don't. It's very possible it could have done that. But check you ubolts and the leafs first.

Camber could be bad from bent shock towers from your airborne experience. What I think is wrong with Frank.

 

Sure. Tell that to all the guys with bent coil buckets in the lt thread..

 

Do you have spindle gussets? That would be the first thing I would check. I bent a spindle a little bit and made it difficult to align accurately.

 

No he doesn't. Also something to check though. Didn't think about that.

 

From what I damage I saw first hand, that side impact never got anywhere near the frame.

On the driver side axle, which direction is it off? Is the wheel moved forward (my guess) or moved back?

 

Well guys I just ordered some fox 2.5 remote resi coilovers, fox 2.0 remote resi rears, and the icon 3 leaf progressive aal. I have my 17 inch scs ray10's sitting in my basement, and I will be having 255/80/17 cooper st maxx's put on them this week.