1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Anyone know where to find the Technical Specs of the GS350's 3.5?

Discussion in '3rd Gen. Tacomas (2016-2023)' started by Scooby24, Dec 23, 2016.

  1. Dec 23, 2016 at 5:38 PM
    #1
    Scooby24

    Scooby24 [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2016
    Member:
    #199113
    Messages:
    1,478
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Greg
    Vehicle:
    2017 DCSB OR 4X4
    I'm curious, the 2GR-FKS in the GS 350 is 311hp, 280 ft lbs of Torque. Compared to our meager 278/265, that's quite a jump. The compression ratio is unchanged at 11.8:1 per lexus's website but I'm curious to know if there are other tech specs (cam info?) where we might see differences that would have made for an increase in 33hp and 15 ft lbs. Are we possibly just a tune away from those same power levels? The only difference I'm seeing published on their basic specs pdf is that the Tacoma is obviously tuned for 87 whereas the GS is 91.

    If it's really just the tune, I suspect there will be a hell of a market for whoever is first to develop a programmer with OTS map or tuning software.
     
    ScTuna likes this.
  2. Dec 26, 2016 at 10:55 PM
    #2
    2017TACOPRO

    2017TACOPRO Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2016
    Member:
    #200059
    Messages:
    86
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Billy
    Delaware
    Vehicle:
    White 2017 Tacoma TRD PRO TACO
    TRD exterior cab badges, 3D TACOMA tailgate emblems, Weather Tech trailer hitch step / bumper guard.
    I will gladly fill my truck with 91 or 93 octane if there is a tune available for giving me 33hp and 15 ft lbs. Given time there will be if they motor is the same? Keep digging to find out how the two engines are different please.
     
  3. Dec 27, 2016 at 12:14 AM
    #3
    faultball

    faultball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2016
    Member:
    #198766
    Messages:
    238
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    WHT2017SR5DCLB2WD
    :popcorn: I smell transplant...subb'd
     
  4. Dec 27, 2016 at 4:27 AM
    #4
    dYL0n

    dYL0n أنا لست الإسلامي

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2011
    Member:
    #49250
    Messages:
    4,595
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Dyl0n
    New Orleans, LA
    Vehicle:
    17TRDORDCSBQSJBLKBRO2SPECU1.04
    1.04. Kbro2s. ICONS.
    That's how them luxury cars squeeze out some more power. Tune/higher octane. Nothing really much more to it.
     
  5. Dec 27, 2016 at 4:47 AM
    #5
    particleman

    particleman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2016
    Member:
    #195164
    Messages:
    174
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2016 2wd SR5
    Squeezing to me would be 4 or 5 hp. Or even less. 33hp and 15ft pounds are pretty big numbers for just a tune and some gas. Thats like a mild supercharger
     
  6. Dec 27, 2016 at 5:54 AM
    #6
    dYL0n

    dYL0n أنا لست الإسلامي

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2011
    Member:
    #49250
    Messages:
    4,595
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Dyl0n
    New Orleans, LA
    Vehicle:
    17TRDORDCSBQSJBLKBRO2SPECU1.04
    1.04. Kbro2s. ICONS.
    You'd be surprised.

    I owned an Audi S5 with a 3.0L supercharged that was rated at 333 crank. The cheaper model in the UK, the A5, same exact engine but down tuned to 268 HP. In the US they used a 2.0L engine.

    My point is, the Tacoma the engine is used for efficiency. The GS is for luxury performance. It's easy for them to down tune these things.
     
  7. Dec 27, 2016 at 6:02 AM
    #7
    dYL0n

    dYL0n أنا لست الإسلامي

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2011
    Member:
    #49250
    Messages:
    4,595
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Dyl0n
    New Orleans, LA
    Vehicle:
    17TRDORDCSBQSJBLKBRO2SPECU1.04
    1.04. Kbro2s. ICONS.
    It does look though that the GS350 has acoustic control induction system. Which is similar to what some Porsche engines do. It varies the length of the intake manifold for various situations = mo powa
     
  8. Dec 27, 2016 at 6:26 AM
    #8
    Scooby24

    Scooby24 [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2016
    Member:
    #199113
    Messages:
    1,478
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Greg
    Vehicle:
    2017 DCSB OR 4X4
    I suppose one more obvious reason for the power differences may be redlines.

    Tacoma using 87 octane: 278 @ 6000 RPM, 265 @ 4600 RPM
    Hilander user 87 octane: 295 @ 6600 RPM, 263 @ 4700 RPM
    GS350 using 91 octane: 311 @ 6400 RPM, 280 @ 4800 RPM

    So, same octane, making more power in the Hilander, but making it above what our redline is so it's possible that everywhere under redline in our trucks, the difference is negligible. The HP gap in the GS could again be greatly attributed to higher RPM, with the real net differences in tune being the torque increase. Having more horsepower above 6000 rpm is not really usable for us.
     
    Plain Jane Taco likes this.
  9. Dec 27, 2016 at 6:29 AM
    #9
    dYL0n

    dYL0n أنا لست الإسلامي

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2011
    Member:
    #49250
    Messages:
    4,595
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Dyl0n
    New Orleans, LA
    Vehicle:
    17TRDORDCSBQSJBLKBRO2SPECU1.04
    1.04. Kbro2s. ICONS.
    Well they're going to post the highest HP rating. If the Tacoma was tuned to make 311 HP, Toyota is going to post it as 311 HP @ 6400 RPM. The redline could be moved.

    The RPM that it makes the most power isn't necesserially the redline.
     
  10. Dec 27, 2016 at 6:43 AM
    #10
    Scooby24

    Scooby24 [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2016
    Member:
    #199113
    Messages:
    1,478
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Greg
    Vehicle:
    2017 DCSB OR 4X4
    Right, but ours makes peak power at redline, so it makes sense that it would continue making power if they'd chosen to increase it. Not sure why they'd have reduced the redline in our trucks...towing?
     
  11. Dec 27, 2016 at 6:57 AM
    #11
    AdventureKid

    AdventureKid Let's Go Places

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Member:
    #47875
    Messages:
    755
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jake
    Oceanside, CA
    Vehicle:
    17' DCSB TRD OR 4x4 6MT
    Camper Shell
    Honestly, do we really want to push the envelope in the name of extra power and torque if it means a diminished reliability?

    I'd gladly keep my meager 278hp/256tq for having the engine go 500k miles+.
     
    VLTHNTR77 and dYL0n like this.
  12. Dec 27, 2016 at 7:01 AM
    #12
    Plain Jane Taco

    Plain Jane Taco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2009
    Member:
    #16179
    Messages:
    40,279
    Gender:
    Male
    USA
    You just took the words out of my mouth. People get too hung up on peak hp/torque #s. It's where in the rpm range that those peak #s are generated that are important. On a truck....the lower the better
     
  13. Dec 27, 2016 at 7:09 AM
    #13
    dYL0n

    dYL0n أنا لست الإسلامي

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2011
    Member:
    #49250
    Messages:
    4,595
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Dyl0n
    New Orleans, LA
    Vehicle:
    17TRDORDCSBQSJBLKBRO2SPECU1.04
    1.04. Kbro2s. ICONS.
    :cheers:
     
    Plain Jane Taco likes this.
  14. Dec 27, 2016 at 7:17 AM
    #14
    Scooby24

    Scooby24 [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2016
    Member:
    #199113
    Messages:
    1,478
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Greg
    Vehicle:
    2017 DCSB OR 4X4
    Well in the case of an 87 vs 91 octane tune, there isn't really a risk for diminished reliability. I'd gladly take the 91 tune to get an extra 15 ft lbs if that's what the real potential for gain is. An extra 5-10 bucks a week at the pump is just fine by me.
     
    shakerhood and Esto like this.
  15. Dec 27, 2016 at 7:42 AM
    #15
    su.b.rat

    su.b.rat broken truck

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2016
    Member:
    #193316
    Messages:
    9,869
    what's the point of accessing more power if it's still available only above 3500? i don't get it. i shift at 3500, 4k at about the highest.

    if i want a tune of some kind (AND I DO!!) then i want more power lower, like the direct injection kick we get at 3500 down at say 1800rpm... holy cripes i'd be happy with that. this is the single complaint i have of the truck.
     
  16. Dec 27, 2016 at 7:49 AM
    #16
    ScTuna

    ScTuna Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2013
    Member:
    #102382
    Messages:
    914
    Gender:
    Male
    Texas
    Vehicle:
    2016 Tacoma
    Could be that Toyota wants the taco to have less hp to not kill the Tundra sell?
     
    jmaack likes this.
  17. Dec 27, 2016 at 5:31 PM
    #17
    STexaslovestacos

    STexaslovestacos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2016
    Member:
    #205817
    Messages:
    434
    First Name:
    Sam
    Vehicle:
    2017 MT TRD OR
    Different intake, exhaust and front dressing (water and power steering pumps on Taco are probably heavier) would account for 33hp very easily. Plus lower redline in the Tacoma.
     
    jmaack likes this.

Products Discussed in

To Top