1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Does my Tacoma need this?

Discussion in '3rd Gen. Tacomas (2016-2023)' started by Masterofnone, Feb 17, 2017.

  1. Feb 17, 2017 at 7:58 PM
    #21
    QanuKoa

    QanuKoa Be good.

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2016
    Member:
    #200779
    Messages:
    78
    Gender:
    Male
    The North Bay 415
    Vehicle:
    2017 4x4 DCLB TRD Sport; 08 forester 5spd MT premium/winter pkg; 89 22re 4x4 5spd ext cab - loved that truck!
    20.3 with the air dam, 20.3 without it. A few thousand miles with both. MPG savings is insignificant if any. I drive 30% freeway (80mph), 40% country roads (65mph) and 30% town.

    I'm keeping it off.
     
  2. Feb 17, 2017 at 10:29 PM
    #22
    faultball

    faultball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2016
    Member:
    #198766
    Messages:
    238
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    WHT2017SR5DCLB2WD
    Always see a bunch on CL daily.
     
  3. Feb 17, 2017 at 11:22 PM
    #23
    Dawnpatrol

    Dawnpatrol Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2016
    Member:
    #204019
    Messages:
    141
    Gender:
    Male
    PNW
    Great thread Masterofone! Well done all! So, my 2017 has only 1k for mileage. The skirt/bra/air whatever looks like crap to me but..............keeping it on for 5K. Then off it comes for 5K. I'll compare mileage and if I see no significant MPG change, i.e., >1mpg.............off it stays. I'm just enthralled by the video (check it out on the air dam thread) displayed about the dam and velocity wings on the new Yotas from the wings on the mirrows to the tail lights. Personally I think they are trying to stretch the federal MPG mandate to 25 MPG but it's like putting lipstick on a pig IMHO. :rolleyes: Not that my 2017 SR5 looks like a pig, I love how she looks..........minus the bra! Could use a few tat's around the..........never mine!
     
  4. Feb 17, 2017 at 11:50 PM
    #24
    PNW BlueReaper

    PNW BlueReaper Slowly but Surely

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2017
    Member:
    #209041
    Messages:
    563
    First Name:
    Aaron
    Kent, WA
    Vehicle:
    05 DCSB Indigo Ink Tacoma
    When it comes to aesthetics, it looks better without it. Couldn't tell you about drag and all that. Don't own a 3rd gen.
     
  5. Feb 18, 2017 at 12:11 AM
    #25
    Tcoma16

    Tcoma16 Galatians 2:20

    Joined:
    May 18, 2016
    Member:
    #187347
    Messages:
    1,245
    Gender:
    Male
    California
    Vehicle:
    2016 TRD Sport
    Took mine off a few weeks ago. Looks so much better. I still get the same MPG.
     
  6. Feb 18, 2017 at 6:51 AM
    #26
    ChukarBob

    ChukarBob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    Member:
    #191836
    Messages:
    228
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Bob
    Seattle
    Vehicle:
    2017 TRD Sport DC LB 4WD AT; preceded by '15 Subaru Outback & 2007 Tacoma SR5 DC LB 4WD AT
    Most who compared mileage with and without report no difference in MPG. Cabin noise, whatever the source, is my concern. Is there any sense about comparative cabin noise from those who have tried it both ways? There is a part of me who wants to trust Toyota's engineers -- that it's providing some useful function.
     
  7. Feb 18, 2017 at 7:58 AM
    #27
    unclebert

    unclebert Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2016
    Member:
    #204611
    Messages:
    120
    Gender:
    Male
    North of Atlanta
    Vehicle:
    2017 SR5 Double Cab 4x4 MGM
    No noticeable difference to me in cabin noise... It literally takes 5 minutes to remove, 10 screws.. If you notice a difference in noise or gas mileage, put it back on..

    I removed mine because where I go deer hunting there's some deep ruts and holes on the road thru the property. First time I went down there in new Tacoma I was worried all weekend about ripping it off...

    I bought a truck to be used as a truck.. Not overly concerned with MPG or cabin noise.. It's a truck
     
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2017
    Jaggerbub likes this.
  8. Feb 18, 2017 at 8:05 AM
    #28
    jackolo

    jackolo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2016
    Member:
    #179365
    Messages:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jackson
    Edmonton AB
    Vehicle:
    '16 TRD Off Road AC
    Hmm... I have an off-road. Totally forgot it never came with an air dam. Highway noise isn't bad for me.
     
  9. Feb 18, 2017 at 10:20 AM
    #29
    bobrown14

    bobrown14 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Member:
    #165752
    Messages:
    4,474
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Bob
    Philadelphia
    Vehicle:
    Gen 3
    bunch of stuff - Bro Pro style

    Wait... didn't you just contradict yourself.. you said it doesn't improve MPG but you are going to put it back on to take a trip??
    Confused... I'm with the straight piece of plastic "pushing" air club not helping much if anything.
    I do agree with the assessment of aerodynamics and drag being improved UNDER the truck .. one reason I have a much larger and flatter skid plate and no air dam.
     
  10. Feb 18, 2017 at 10:51 AM
    #30
    Nitori

    Nitori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2016
    Member:
    #186058
    Messages:
    4,885
    Maricopa AZ
    Vehicle:
    2021 T4R SR5
    I don't understand how you took "the difference is ~1 MPG or so in practical use" to mean "it doesn't improve MPG"o_O
     
    Roxanne16 and synaps3 like this.
  11. Feb 18, 2017 at 10:52 AM
    #31
    oilslick

    oilslick Slicker than shnot!!!

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2007
    Member:
    #2313
    Messages:
    254
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Big John
    northeast Pa.
    Vehicle:
    2017 DC 4x4 Sport
    Light Bar w/4 KC Off Road lights,
    Damn those dams!!!! LOL!

    :rant:
     
  12. Feb 18, 2017 at 10:53 AM
    #32
    PROseur

    PROseur Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2015
    Member:
    #171837
    Messages:
    10,576
    First Name:
    Pussy
    Vehicle:
    2012 FJC TTSE/ 2001 Taliban Poverty DCSB/ 2017 6MT PRO / 2018 2.7L SR Utility
    You didn't make your daughter dump him ?!
     
    bobrown14 and Jaggerbub like this.
  13. Feb 18, 2017 at 11:04 AM
    #33
    Kilokato

    Kilokato Go Vols!

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Member:
    #10996
    Messages:
    830
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    George
    East Tennessee
    Vehicle:
    2016 SR5 Access Cab V6 Auto 4wd
    Limited wheels, extra rope hooks in bed.
    I think it would make more of a mpg difference for the guys getting 22+ mpg than it would for the guys only getting 18 mpg.

    I'm thinking the guys getting 18 mpg are pushing the gas harder anyways so aerodynamics aren't coming into play as much.
     
    Roxanne16, Tharris242 and TWTaco like this.
  14. Feb 18, 2017 at 11:16 AM
    #34
    Nitori

    Nitori Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2016
    Member:
    #186058
    Messages:
    4,885
    Maricopa AZ
    Vehicle:
    2021 T4R SR5
    Yeah, a little chin spoiler isn't going to solve a lead foot or gnarly 70+ lb wheels and tires. For that matter even a terminal speed of ~80 MPH is probably far outpacing any benefit from the difference in drag.

    Lightweight wheels w/ OEM tires (or something equally light-duty) plus a willingness to remain in the right lane and chill with roughly 65-70 MPH being your "top speed" will see the greatest effect from the dam.

    It's a complex equation, but like I said in my first post, any extra tire coverage is a godsend for aerodynamics.
     
  15. Feb 18, 2017 at 11:30 AM
    #35
    GPsevinSixx

    GPsevinSixx Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2016
    Member:
    #194631
    Messages:
    3,021
    Ros Angerus
    Vehicle:
    2015twoAX2.4techPAWS
    6112/5160AALfnCNTSTRyokG015
    I almost read that as tire coverage (width) relative to ground contact. LOL.
    But you are correct, "covering up" the tire is advantageous, but needs to be through long term continuous runs and not lead footed stop light runs. I've mentioned before for folks to look at NASCAR aerodynamics as they give the best aero efficiency for those behemoth weights with downforce they require in a race car that's closest (in shape) to our road going vehicles.

    In my job, I've mocked stuff up in windtunnels with NASCAR-like aero on a current production car to be able set a baseline delta for subsequent runs.
     
  16. Feb 18, 2017 at 11:38 AM
    #36
    Masterofnone

    Masterofnone [OP] 140.85

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2017
    Member:
    #207536
    Messages:
    1,632
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Bobby
    Kansas
    Vehicle:
    2017 TRD Sport AC MT
    Let's see this complex equation...

    I said I couldn't see how pushing plastic into the wind would help and you said I was quite wrong and every little bit helps.

    No you're saying that its optional range is probably around 65-70. Which means the faster I go the less it's able to do because "pushing a piece of plastic into the wind doesn't help."

    I understand your thinking and you have some valid points, but to say these stupid little gimmicks and pieces of plastic significantly improve MPG are outright lies. You said the difference is "about 1mpg." But that is only valid if you're going slower, which saves way more gas than a piece of plastic ever could.

    I suspect that any savings you get in MPG is so miniscule that you'd need to factor it in over the life of the vehicle to see any sort of tangible savings, and even then, as you admit, it's only if you drove slow.
     
    bobrown14 likes this.
  17. Feb 18, 2017 at 11:45 AM
    #37
    GPsevinSixx

    GPsevinSixx Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2016
    Member:
    #194631
    Messages:
    3,021
    Ros Angerus
    Vehicle:
    2015twoAX2.4techPAWS
    6112/5160AALfnCNTSTRyokG015
    That piece of plastic will be useful to a point. That point is where the engine's power is most efficient with the amount of drag created by all other external factors. Every bit helps that equation. That's why the sport models have different rubber and larger rim diameter increasing the disc shape. It's not just this one piece of plastic in front. It all adds up. For most of us that mod the trucks with huge exposed tires, heavy armor, giant racks on top, it won't help at all, so it makes no difference if the chin spoiler is on.

    Sidewall profile and tread shoulder also come into play at these minuscule levels. Aero count advantage and "points" are removed/ added even with the shape of of a tail light edge change and helps aero efficiency and turbulence at the rear of the vehicle. Look at the Prius for example and the rear edge of the car. All the vehicles in current production are the same.
     
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2017
    cctk2 and bobrown14 like this.
  18. Feb 18, 2017 at 11:52 AM
    #38
    worthywads

    worthywads Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Member:
    #58841
    Messages:
    5,345
    Gender:
    Male
    Peoples Republic of Boulder
    Vehicle:
    05 5-lug access I4 Stick, 70 Challenger Vert
    It will actually help at greater than 65-70 too. 1mpg isn't miniscule.

    It helps if you want improved mpg, simple as that.
     
  19. Feb 18, 2017 at 11:55 AM
    #39
    BrettsMac08

    BrettsMac08 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2015
    Member:
    #172372
    Messages:
    546
    Kansas
    Vehicle:
    2016 DCSB TRD Sport | 2002 Camaro SS
    KDMax Tuned | MagnaFlow Exhaust | OEM Audio Plus Reference 450Q | TRD Pro Wheels | AT Tires | LED Interior Lighting
    Well I get around 16.5 to 18 MPG anyway as it is. Usually right at 17.2 on any given trip combined and down to 13MPG on the interstate going 80 across Kansas to Colorado. So I figure it won't make much of a difference anyway. The thing still shifts to 4th at the slightest bump so why not take the thing off? I'll keep it if I find some major difference but this thread finally encouraged me to go ahead and take it off. Next thing you know I'll be getting one of those TRD skid plates or something similar, haha.

    Before
    [​IMG]

    After
    [​IMG]
     
    SilverII and bobrown14 like this.
  20. Feb 18, 2017 at 11:57 AM
    #40
    Masterofnone

    Masterofnone [OP] 140.85

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2017
    Member:
    #207536
    Messages:
    1,632
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Bobby
    Kansas
    Vehicle:
    2017 TRD Sport AC MT
    Right.... TO A POINT. You guys keep saying that all these little bits help; I'm saying the help they offer is so miniscule that removing one or two of them will never be missed.

    Remove a grain of wheat to a bushel. Do you have less grain? Yes. Does it really matter that much? No.

    I said I didn't see the value in something and was told I was wrong for not seeing it. And now nobody can give enough evidence to prove how valuable that piece is, if any.

    A firm indication of that is when I ask "how much does this REALLY save me," you bring up a Toyota Prius.
     
    bobrown14 likes this.

Products Discussed in

To Top