1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Looking to buy my first Tacoma. 4cyl vs 6 cyl?

Discussion in '1st Gen. Tacomas (1995-2004)' started by Johhnyreb, Jun 6, 2017.

  1. Jun 6, 2017 at 4:32 PM
    #21
    onakat

    onakat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2016
    Member:
    #191075
    Messages:
    1,675
    Gender:
    Female
    Canada
    Vehicle:
    2000 indestructaco!
    I have a 4cyl 2.7 and I do exactly the same as you want to do with yours. I haul some firewood and some tools around in my truck. I go in the wilderness every year with it (1000 kms trips). It never failed me and it fits my needs perfectly.

    Right now it is just retired for maintenance and tune-ups, but I hope to but it back to use very soon

    If you plan on towing or hauling big and heavy things, go with the v6, but for things like wood and tools, the I4 is enough
     
    Dalandser likes this.
  2. Jun 6, 2017 at 4:42 PM
    #22
    boostedka

    boostedka Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Member:
    #64367
    Messages:
    6,063
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    James
    NM
    Vehicle:
    2013 DCSB 6MT, 2004 4runner
    I vote 3.4. I've had both. I love certain things about my current 2.7, but if you're planning on keeping your motor basically stock you should go V6.
     
    3rYODA, Dalandser and eon_blue like this.
  3. Jun 6, 2017 at 4:49 PM
    #23
    eon_blue

    eon_blue If I would, could you

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2016
    Member:
    #180213
    Messages:
    69,898
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ryan
    Azusa, CA
    Vehicle:
    '04 TRD 3.4l 4x4 5sp manual Xtraca & '96 4runner 4x4 5spd manual
    Just curious but how's the 4cyl with the turbo compare to the 3.4l?
     
  4. Jun 6, 2017 at 6:04 PM
    #24
    boostedka

    boostedka Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Member:
    #64367
    Messages:
    6,063
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    James
    NM
    Vehicle:
    2013 DCSB 6MT, 2004 4runner
    Right now I'm at about 7psi on a 5o trim turbo and I honestly feel like it's not only faster than a stock 3.4 but it's faster than my S/C 3.4 I had before this truck.

    To add to that though, I am at 5000ft altitude so the power loss all motor is noticeable and the S/C loses about 2psi being pulley driven at this altitude vs a turbo being wastgate driven relative to altitude.

    When my 2.7 was stock with 3.90 gears and 31's, it was a dog up hills on the freeway and got about 2-3mpg less than my s/c 3.4 did
     
    eon_blue[QUOTED] and Dalandser like this.
  5. Jun 6, 2017 at 7:17 PM
    #25
    vern650

    vern650 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2013
    Member:
    #111738
    Messages:
    837
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    brandon
    hyrum, ut
    Vehicle:
    '97 4x4 taco xtra cab 3rz/5spd
    HBS leveling kit, 31x10.50 mudders, header/imco exhaust, rear billies, LR ucas, home brewed onboard air, cb radio
    I'll be an odd man out and say go for the 2.7, but only if it's manual. I tow a 4 seater side by side up winding mtn roads with mine and it handles that just fine and that's with 33"s. rescued a couple full size diesels with it as well. I have about 5 friends with 3.4l as well and power wise(as far as drag racing goes) my 4 banger is right in the midst of the group, have beat some and been beaten by some. Fuel mileage wise, the 3.4ls I know range anywhere from low teens to upper teens whereas my 2.7l averages 20-22 mpg daily driving. If your willing to spend some money and do a turbo, the 2.7 is a no brainer. Just youtube search turbo 2rz/3rz, these engines love boost and can be built to hit some impressive numbers.
     
    Dalandser likes this.
  6. Jun 6, 2017 at 8:47 PM
    #26
    3rYODA

    3rYODA Don’t sell to me, I don’t pay.

    Joined:
    May 26, 2016
    Member:
    #187979
    Messages:
    1,507
    Gender:
    Male
    Santa Clarita, CA
    Vehicle:
    2015 white 4x4 TRD
    Fox 2.5’s up front, icon 2.0 rear shocks, stock leafs, !Meso map and dome lights make all the difference in the world!
    everyone asks 2.7/3.4 ive had both i threw away my 2.7 to get a 3.4

    ive drove my last 3.4L to 304K and blew a rod still drove it for a few weeks got to work,


    buy a 4x4 v6 and you will be very happy id say go with the 5 speed but the auto is good as well i just like telling my truck how to run
     
    boostedka likes this.
  7. Jun 6, 2017 at 10:06 PM
    #27
    2K_Taco

    2K_Taco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2016
    Member:
    #192245
    Messages:
    72
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Glenn
    Campbell, CA
    Vehicle:
    2000 Tacoma SR5 4x4 TRD
    If you live in the mountains, you don't want a 4 cylinder...
     
    boostedka likes this.
  8. Jun 7, 2017 at 12:03 AM
    #28
    09BlueBeast

    09BlueBeast Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2014
    Member:
    #141258
    Messages:
    989
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Cody
    Denver
    Vehicle:
    09 Speedway Blue TRD Sport 4x4
    Just bought a 98 4runner with 217k and the 3.4 and drove 1300 miles without doing anything other than a solid 10pm basic visual inspection of just the overall condition of the truck and handing the guy my money. Drove from Brownsville, Texas back home to Denver in just under 24 hours of driving. That route covers BFE pretty well, I remember a stretch of over an hour of no cell service. Never once did I doubt my new to me 3.4... FYI that's where Brownsville is IMG_4612.jpg
     
    boostedka likes this.
  9. Jun 7, 2017 at 3:08 AM
    #29
    E30325

    E30325 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2016
    Member:
    #203171
    Messages:
    4,270
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Nick
    Vehicle:
    2000 Tacoma TRD 5spd
    5100's and OME 881's, AAL and KM3's
    I vote ford, chevy's suck :anonymous:



    Oh wait, that's a different argument...Now for 9mm vs .45 :rofl:

    Serious note though, I drove several 3rz's before buying my 3.4, and while they are both bomb proof motors, in daily driving I feel like I would get tired of how slow the 4 bangers are
     
    boostedka likes this.
  10. Jun 7, 2017 at 10:12 AM
    #30
    TacomaJunkie8691

    TacomaJunkie8691 1999WineTacoma

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2015
    Member:
    #153969
    Messages:
    631
    Gender:
    Male
    WA State
    Vehicle:
    1999 Wine Tacoma SR5 Exta-Cab 4wd V6
    Completely Stock except for Ranch 5000 Shocks and Struts.
    Hey Everybody,

    Here we go again beating this issue with kinves and hammers.

    This is my analysis of the two engines. They are both great engines, by the way, that are extremely reliable and dependable. To all the serious mechanically talented members, I know there are a lot more differences than what I am going to outline in this post. I am just trying to give this member who is trying to decide between these two engines a general idea of the differences between these two motors.

    The Toyota 2.7 inline 4 cylinder is a much simpler motor than its 3.4 V6 sibling. It is a single head, which makes everything inside the engine compartment extremely accessible with the exception of the fuel filter. These Toyota four bangers use a timing chain rather than a timing belt. As a result, timing chains are replaced much less frequently than timing belts. Because of their simplicity, size and configuration, this motor is both easier and cheaper to maintain and repair than its larger Toyota 3.4 V6 sibling. It will get also get better gas mileage. Although, this is not a significant difference.

    The Toyota 5VZ-FE 3.4 liter V6 engine is a very sophisticated motor with two heads and double overhead cams per head. It uses a timing belt instead of a chain, which has to be replaced every 90,000 to 100,000 miles. As a result of its size and configuration, it occupies a lot of space in the engine compartment, which makes getting at things a bit difficult. It is going to be both the more expensive and complicated motor to both maintain and repair. Please don't assume that the 3.4 is an impossible motor to work on. This certainly is not the case. It is just way more complicated of a motor to work on than its 2.7 liter sibling. The 3.4 is going to have significantly more horsepower and torque than its smaller sibling, which makes it much more useful when doing ugly stuff like hauling and towing.


    Good Luck ,
    Paul
     
    SpecMouse and E30325 like this.
  11. Jun 7, 2017 at 4:58 PM
    #31
    ToxicTwin

    ToxicTwin Money Talks...It Says Goodbye

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2016
    Member:
    #189320
    Messages:
    1,061
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Robert
    Glendale AZ
    Vehicle:
    2009 TRD OR
    Welcome to TW. Definitely get the 3.4l, I wish I had. I just couldn't pass up the deal I got on my truck ($2100). So I will just have to live with it, the 2.7l is decent but I would like more power.
    Good luck with your search.
     
  12. Jun 7, 2017 at 8:00 PM
    #32
    Ridgerunner

    Ridgerunner Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Member:
    #5269
    Messages:
    5,139
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Frank
    Rocklin, Ca.
    Vehicle:
    2001 prerunner doublecab limited
    2001 with; cat-back side-swept twin exhaust, elbow mod, Westin bullbar with Hella 450 driving lights, Snugtop XTR camper shell, TRD off-road 2x4-black beauty.
    Very good posts in here. I have the v6 and I feel that mine being a 4000lb. truck, that little 204 cubic inch v6 moves that 4000lbs. with more authority than many v8s did in previous generations of trucks. I vote v6. There was a vender that I knew at work that had a 2001 DC with the 2.7-he was pretty unhappy with that motor but loved his truck. He was jealous of my v6 but I told him that the attributes that make his 2.7 so cool are its absolute bulletproof quality, its fierce reliability, and the fact that its lineage goes clear back through so many fail-proof, legendary 4-banger trucks in the Toyota family. The fact is, that its power falls a little short for what it has to move. Oh it'll rise to the job, but the owner has to come to a resolve in his mind to accept it.
     
    SpecMouse, ToxicTwin, ekul310 and 2 others like this.
  13. Jun 8, 2017 at 4:32 PM
    #33
    Rmodel65

    Rmodel65 Yukon Cornelius

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2010
    Member:
    #44090
    Messages:
    2,666
    Gender:
    Male
    Jawja
    Vehicle:
    1996 Yota 4x4
    Viper Red paint

    Neither 10mm ftw!
     
  14. Jun 8, 2017 at 5:14 PM
    #34
    Taco302

    Taco302 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Member:
    #105981
    Messages:
    768
    Gender:
    Male
    Greenbow, Alabama
    Vehicle:
    2003 2.7L 5 spd 4x4 xtracab

    This is perhaps the best post i have ever read.
     
    Ridgerunner[QUOTED] likes this.
  15. Jun 8, 2017 at 5:50 PM
    #35
    ekul310

    ekul310 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2016
    Member:
    #188443
    Messages:
    268
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Luke
    Pennsylvania
    Vehicle:
    2002 Lunar Mist Regular Cab 4x4
    Stock stock stock
    I would have to agree. My 03 DC 3.4 handles weight and 32s pretty well. I used to have an 84 standard cab pickup on 33s and stock gears...let's just say that 22r (yes, carbureted) didn't like turning those tires, but never let me down. I even drove that thing from Denver where I bought it back to Pittsburgh!

    Edit: My vote is for the V6. Very simple to work on compared to other V6 engines. And utterly bulletproof with regular maintenance.

    Obligatory driveway pic of aforementioned 84:
    IMG_0120.jpg
     
    Last edited: Jun 8, 2017
    Ridgerunner likes this.
  16. Jun 8, 2017 at 6:20 PM
    #36
    Ridgerunner

    Ridgerunner Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Member:
    #5269
    Messages:
    5,139
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Frank
    Rocklin, Ca.
    Vehicle:
    2001 prerunner doublecab limited
    2001 with; cat-back side-swept twin exhaust, elbow mod, Westin bullbar with Hella 450 driving lights, Snugtop XTR camper shell, TRD off-road 2x4-black beauty.
    And this is best compliment I've ever received. Thanks!
     
  17. Jun 8, 2017 at 8:45 PM
    #37
    Johhnyreb

    Johhnyreb [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2017
    Member:
    #220817
    Messages:
    55
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jonathan
    TN
    Vehicle:
    N/A
    Thanks for all the input here! After reading all of the advise, I will definitely be getting a v6.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top