1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Fox IFP or DSC?

Discussion in '3rd Gen. Tacomas (2016-2023)' started by ferntr33, Sep 7, 2018.

?

Which Fox?

Poll closed Sep 14, 2018.
  1. IFP

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. remote resi DSC

    100.0%
  1. Sep 7, 2018 at 12:40 AM
    #1
    ferntr33

    ferntr33 [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2017
    Member:
    #238159
    Messages:
    601
    Trying to decide if I want/need the DSC remote res 2.5" or if the IFP would be fine . . .
    Looking to either build a basic setup. Or go big and get TC upper and stock length lowers and run a bypass as well as their mid travel SUA. Has anyone had their IFP's fade on them? Im assuming the IFP is the same as PRO suspension just adjustable in height?
     
  2. Sep 7, 2018 at 12:44 AM
    #2
    m603holden

    m603holden @Koditten Pirate Radio member #063

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2014
    Member:
    #140581
    Messages:
    11,732
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Marteeen
    New England
    Vehicle:
    2017 Tacoma DCSB OR MT
    Lots of sail boat fuel
    I
    I don't believe so. I think the pro has an internal bypass system built into the body. I'll let someone confirm that though.

    I've got the resi. They work great. So farfary longest run is 1:20 on +4" corrugated roads at high speed. Nothing felt at the wheel.
     
  3. Sep 7, 2018 at 12:49 AM
    #3
    ferntr33

    ferntr33 [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2017
    Member:
    #238159
    Messages:
    601
    Isn't that what the IFP is?
     
  4. Sep 7, 2018 at 12:53 AM
    #4
    m603holden

    m603holden @Koditten Pirate Radio member #063

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2014
    Member:
    #140581
    Messages:
    11,732
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Marteeen
    New England
    Vehicle:
    2017 Tacoma DCSB OR MT
    Lots of sail boat fuel
    The ifp is the floating piston. The bypass is physical channels in the body for the fluid to bypass.
     
  5. Sep 7, 2018 at 12:58 AM
    #5
    m603holden

    m603holden @Koditten Pirate Radio member #063

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2014
    Member:
    #140581
    Messages:
    11,732
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Marteeen
    New England
    Vehicle:
    2017 Tacoma DCSB OR MT
    Lots of sail boat fuel
    I'm sure @*TRD* can help you with all your needs and questions. Shocks are their jam and can give you a good suggestion purely based on what you're looking to do.
     
    MCDavis likes this.
  6. Sep 7, 2018 at 12:59 AM
    #6
    ferntr33

    ferntr33 [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2017
    Member:
    #238159
    Messages:
    601
    ah. I wonder where I thought the IFP was just the generic PRO shock. I guess that kinda makes me want to get the resi. haha.:spending:
     
  7. Sep 7, 2018 at 1:04 AM
    #7
    m603holden

    m603holden @Koditten Pirate Radio member #063

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2014
    Member:
    #140581
    Messages:
    11,732
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Marteeen
    New England
    Vehicle:
    2017 Tacoma DCSB OR MT
    Lots of sail boat fuel
    The ifp separates the oil and gas. In a RR, it's located in the reservoirs. You'll get more oil and gas volume, which means external forces won't effect it as much.

    If it's within budget, at least do the 2.5 up front because those can be re-build into an RR model later if you decide.

    To be honest though if I wasn't hammering the roads that I do, I would have just got some 2.5s up front and had them re-valved for an affordable price from @*TRD* right out of the box and called it a day. Even the OME and 5100 are good for general OR.
     
    *TRD* likes this.
  8. Sep 7, 2018 at 1:11 AM
    #8
    ferntr33

    ferntr33 [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2017
    Member:
    #238159
    Messages:
    601
    So the 2.5's you got weren't valved for what you needed? I figured they would be spot on since its made specifically for our trucks.
     
  9. Sep 7, 2018 at 1:13 AM
    #9
    m603holden

    m603holden @Koditten Pirate Radio member #063

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2014
    Member:
    #140581
    Messages:
    11,732
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Marteeen
    New England
    Vehicle:
    2017 Tacoma DCSB OR MT
    Lots of sail boat fuel
    Depends on what you're planning on adding for weight. I have the adjusters so mine are fine. But for short change, they can make them better for your specific truck, if you want.

    Out of the box they'll still be light-years better than stock.
     
  10. Sep 7, 2018 at 2:40 AM
    #10
    pillsburydoughboy

    pillsburydoughboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2018
    Member:
    #245852
    Messages:
    75
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    ‘18 TRD OR DC MT
    If you have budgeted for remote reservoirs w/ DSC, I’d go with those. On the long run it is cheaper to rebuild (I believe), good to be overprepared than underprepared, last longer through abuse, and if you want to get rid of them, people will obviously pay more for the remote reservoirs used.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top