Falken Wildpeak at3w 265/75 R16

I’ve got LT265/75-16s KO2s on my new Pro. I run them at 40 psi and am happy with the ride.

 

265/75/16s on my pro. Had em switch then from my second gen when I bought my new truck. They are great tires for the money and one size bigger then what comes on the pro anyways.

 

It's been a good 5k miles on these Falken and I enjoy them very much. It doesn't cost an arm and leg. Ride quality is great low and high speeds. Great traction as well as the grip on average terrain. They did well for me up in Flagstaff, Williams, and Sedona. I haven't been anywhere else besides these places. Slowly learning the ropes on off-roading.

 

If you start doing any decent off-roading, you’ll want a tire with a 3 ply sidewall.

 

I've been running these for about 4k miles. For anyone that's curious, the vehicle travels 4.3% further than what the mileage reports. I've verified it a few different times. Plus it means your mileage is a little better than the car reports.

 

Yeah, I want to wait until I can lift it and go with a larger tire that has a decent sidewall as you mentioned.

 

Bam! Thats exactly what Im doing Friday when I take delivery of my calvary blue Pro. Going with Toyo Open Country AT2s which I ran on my Wrangler for years. I just came here from a search on 265/75/16 with stock suspensions, not trying to hijack s**t

 

Loving this tire so far, excited to see how they perform in the snow.

 

I enjoy these tires as well. They worked great for me in Flagstaff,Arizona and Sedona. The grips of the tires did a great job keeping the truck grounded and to me felt like it had really good traction on the soft snow.

 

any rub on factory mudflap ?

 

No rubbing at all on anything.

 

I will likely be going with 256/75/16 Wildpeaks on my stock 2018 OR. It looks like my two choices are SL or E range, yes? Have I understood this correctly: SL with have a lower load capacity/softer ride, E is higher load, but at the compromise of a marginal MPG loss/'harder' ride?

I'm not full on running massive trails or climbing 5ft rocks, but I don't want to put myself at a disadvantage down the road. Could I save the $$ and be okay with SL?

Edit: I think I've found my answer after scouring the pages and searching. I think I'm fine with SL unless there are some E purists here. Anymore insight is welcome.

 

No rubbing?? What’s size?

 

E load are 10 plys. Most would say they are overkill for a daily driver unless you play hard. If you are just looking for a better upgrade over stock and don’t want to sacrifice ride quality and MpG just get the SL’s

 

Or rather... get a Prius it delivers waaaay better MPG

Tacoma =
Prius=

 

Electric motors don’t have a torque problem... just saying lol

 

Ah, yes!! I forgot...

 

Yours is a pro? It’s a weird angle cause it looks like a long bed.

 

Yep 18 pro. My 2nd gen was a long bed. Man I love this new one though.

 

265/75/16s. Still contemplating when they wear down if I wanna bump up to 285s.