1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Tire Size Effect - Discussion/Debate

Discussion in 'Wheels & Tires' started by jaystellato, Apr 1, 2020.

  1. Apr 1, 2020 at 11:34 AM
    #1
    jaystellato

    jaystellato [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2016
    Member:
    #193854
    Messages:
    130
    Gender:
    Male
    Bethlehem, PA
    Hi all, thanks for checking in. I'm at a crossroads in choosing my next set of tires and was hoping I could turn to this forum for some guidance.

    I have a supercharged 2014 DCLB Sport averaging roughly 19.5 MPG combined on premium fuel (usually 93 octane). This is a daily driven highway truck (250 miles/week), with some offroad use, and zero ambition for wheeling/crawling/etc. That said I do enjoy the appearance and versatility of an all-terrain tire. I have no imminent need to lift the truck, but do toy with the thought of a 5100/885 setup. All considerations below will mount on factory TRD sport wheels.

    I currently have:
    265/70R17 | Hankook Dynapro ATM | Load E | 50 lbs/tire

    .. and am considering the following:
    265/70R17 | Hankook Dynapro AT2 | SL Load | 40 lbs/tire
    265/70R17 | Falken Wildpeak A/T3W | SL Load | 46.5 lbs/tire
    255/80R17 | Falken Wildpeak A/T3W | E Load | 52.5 lbs/tire

    I've had a great experience with my Hankooks, but certainly don't require the E load tire. I'm curious however, if the smaller treadwidth of the 255/80R17 Wildpeak could mitigate the adverse effect of additional rotational mass when considering fuel economy. I'd love the aesthetic of a 33" tire, but don't want to bury myself with fuel costs any further.

    Of the options listed above, which do you think would have the greatest effect on fuel economy and ride comfort - positively or negatively? I'm open to other considerations as well. I understand these trucks were not made for MPG's, but this is the situation I find myself in while unable purchase of a second, more economical vehicle.

    Thanks in advance!
     
  2. Apr 1, 2020 at 11:47 AM
    #2
    That one old guy

    That one old guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2019
    Member:
    #286340
    Messages:
    1,285
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Chuck
    Vehicle:
    08 Base 4x4 2.7 Access 5spd
    Stockish
    That size above in a Cooper Discoverer AT3 would be my choice. Great all around tire, and sereral styles to choose from.
     
    Pete_Patter likes this.
  3. Apr 2, 2020 at 4:47 AM
    #3
    Pete_Patter

    Pete_Patter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2018
    Member:
    #255226
    Messages:
    156
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2018 Calvary Blue Tacoma TRD Pro
    If you go to the LT255/80R17 size you might have tire rubbing. I would recomend going to a SL tire if you are not towing or hauling heavy loads it will make the ride more comforable and should help mpg. SL tires are also usual better for wet weather than there equvalent LT load range E counterpart. The reason for this is Tire companies design LT tires to give up some wet for increase durability.
     
  4. Apr 2, 2020 at 4:52 AM
    #4
    Clearwater Bill

    Clearwater Bill Never answer an anonymous letter

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2014
    Member:
    #140097
    Messages:
    24,559
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Billy
    Largo Florida
    Vehicle:
    '13 5 lug AC w/convenience package
    A few OE parts from fancy trucks
    If you can get past that, a set of Michelin Defenders, even in the size you currently run, would serve your stated use of the truck very well.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top