AR-15 BS Thread

JCOOR · Oct 28, 2020

IPNPULZ said: ↑

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has recently changed the manner in which it interprets the statutory and regulatory definition of “handgun,” thereby further limiting the types of firearms eligible for importation. These determinations are not public, so it is difficult for the regulated community to assess and track shifting agency positions.

The Gun Control Act at 18 U.S.C. § 922(l) broadly prohibits the importation of all firearms into the United States. However, so long as a firearm is not military surplus nor subject to the National Firearms Act, section 925(d)(3) provides a limited exception for those firearms considered by ATF to be “generally recognized as particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes." Over the past half century, ATF has issued several studies and criteria on how it evaluates whether shotguns, rifles, or handguns qualify as “sporting” under the law. The handgun factoring test is the most straightforward of these, with a point tally system that rewards larger and bulkier handguns. If a handgun receives 75 or more points, it is considered “sporting” and approved for importation. However, there is no ATF-issued “sporting purpose” test for a firearm that fails to fit within the definition of handgun, rifle, or shotgun. Accordingly, ATF has long held that such a firearm is not importable.

Despite ATF previously stating that there is no limit to how long or heavy a handgun should be to qualify as “sporting” under section 925(d)(3), ATF private classification letters issued within the past few months indicate that the agency has shifted course by reinterpreting what constitutes a “handgun.” In company-specific letters, ATF takes the position that if a submitted firearm is too long or too heavy, it fails to meet the definition of “handgun” under the Gun Control Act, as it is not “designed to be held and fired by the use of a single hand.” The Firearms and Ammunition Technology Division (FATD) of ATF—which conducts importability evaluations—says that it is taking a subjective approach to the statute by allowing individual examiners to determine if he or she can fire the weapon with one hand without difficulty.

This approach is resulting in inconsistent determinations, of which the regulated community should take note. Within the past few months, at least one HK91 pistol-style submission as light as 8 pounds, with a barrel length of 8-3/4 inches and an overall length of 21-3/4 inches, has been determined to fall outside the definition of “handgun.” This is a change from previous determinations where firearms weighing over 8 pounds, with 20-inch barrels, and an overall length of approximately 31-1/2 inches were held by FATD to be “handguns.” Since the letters are not publicly available, it is impossible for regulated companies to know the full range of FATD’s determinations. This has serious implications for regulated businesses.

In some of the new letters, ATF has begun listing the following “objective design features” when making its evaluations:

Incorporation of rifle sights;

Utilization of "rifle caliber ammunition" (both 5.56mm and 7.62mm have been considered as such);

Incorporation of “rifle-length barrel;”1

The “weapon’s heavy weight;”

Ability to accept magazines that range in capacity from 20 rounds to 100 rounds, “which will contribute to the overall weight of the firearm”; and

Overall length of the weapon which “creates a front-heavy imbalance when held in one hand.”

However, ATF also noted in the most recent private ruling that the above design features are “neither binding on future classifications nor is any factor individually determinative[.]” ATF explained without elaboration that “the statutory and regulatory definitions provide the appropriate standard in classifying the firearm.” ATF concluded that “a firearm that is too large, too heavy or . . . otherwise not designed to be held and fired in one hand (as demonstrated by the objective features) cannot be a handgun under the statutory definition and cannot be subject to importation criteria governing handguns.” In light of ATF’s subjective and inconsistent analysis of size and weight, it is difficult to predict how the agency will classify any given firearm under this standard.

Revocation of Existing Import Permits

ATF acknowledged in one letter this month that certain firearms previously approved for importation and determined to be handguns “may wrongly have been approved for importation” and that “uch firearms may require reevaluation.” Beyond that, ATF has not acknowledged a change in policy. Instead, it argued that “consideration of the objective design features of a firearm to determine the designed and/or intended use is clearly not a change in policy.” Although “ATF has not developed a definitive list of features that determine whether an item is a ‘pistol’ or ‘handgun[,]’” the non-public letters leave importers to consult the above-mentioned list to assess whether their existing import permits may be revoked or whether new applications will be denied.

Consideration of Certain Handguns as Any Other Weapons (AOW)

The new interpretation of the handgun definition could have additional significant effects on manufacturers and gun owners.

Under the National Firearms Act, a firearm that has an overall length of less than 26 inches and is neither a pistol, rifle nor shotgun is classified as an “Any Other Weapon” (AOW).2 This means that if a firearm under 26 inches in overall length is determined not to be a pistol, rifle, or shotgun, it would necessarily be classified as an AOW.3 AOWs require the payment of a tax and registration with the federal government.

Under ATF’s new reading of the definition, firearms previously classified as large-sized handguns by ATF may now require registration under the National Firearms Act as an AOW.4Possession of such a firearm without registration is punishable by up to ten years in prison. Since ATF has not articulated a standard, it is difficult to definitively know whether a large handgun is now an AOW because it may be deemed by the agency to be “too large, or too heavy” to fit within the statutory definition of handgun. The only definitive way to know is to submit the firearm to ATF for evaluation, a process that can take over a year.

Interim Final Rule on Improper Agency Guidance

ATF reportedly believes that its new analysis is the only way to conduct evaluations in light of the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Interim Final Rule on Improper Agency Guidance (IFR)—a procedural rule designed to increase regulatory transparency. That position appears to run contrary to the purpose of the IFR and so far, the agency has not put it in writing. Further, one ATF private letter from this month attempts to shield itself from DOJ’s IFR by indicating that the letter is “not a final classification of the firearm and is not final agency action.” It goes on to say, “if you submit an ATF Form 6 for the importation of the subject firearm, ATF will take appropriate action.” It appears that ATF is saying that the letter is not final agency action until a Form 6 is formally rejected. But given that this firearm was already evaluated pursuant to an ATF Form 6 application, it is unclear what additional steps are available to make this letter final agency action.

* * *

Under ATF’s new interpretation of the handgun definition, millions of AR-15 style pistols could be considered “too large, or too heavy” to fall within ATF’s new interpretation, thereby making them unregistered NFA weapons, and subjecting manufacturers and gun owners to criminal prosecution. Given the private nature of ATF’s classification rulings, and the subjective nature of the analysis, it is extremely difficult to know for sure whether specific firearms fall within the new interpretation. This appears to be part of a continuing trend at ATF to apply firearms statutes in a more restrictive manner without informing the public—a trend that appears unaffected by the IFR. In this uncertain regulatory environment, importers and manufacturers should consult counsel before making significant purchasing, importing, or manufacturing decisions for firearms that could be implicated by ATF’s heretofore unknown and undisclosed analysis.

[1] It is unclear what constitutes a “rifle-length barrel” or “rifle caliber ammunition.”

[2] See 26 U.S.C. § 5845(e).

[3] This firm is aware of two FATD determinations where the submitted firearms were determined neither to be pistols (because they were too large or too heavy) nor AOWs (because their overall length exceeded 26 inches). A third FATD determination was issued for a firearm considered too large or too heavy to be a handgun and under 26 inches in overall length. However, unlike the first two letters, this determination did not mention the AOW statute.

[4] Note that while the GCA definition of “handgun” is worded differently from the NFA definition of “pistol,” the core elements are the same.

Click to expand...

People are Burning Looting Murdering in cities across the country and the ATF is worried about a fucking arm brace. It’s time for them to be disbanded

Beretta4x4 · Oct 28, 2020

JCOOR said: ↑

People are Burning Looting Murdering in cities across the country and the ATF is worried about a fucking arm brace. It’s time for them to be disbanded
Click to expand...

They should never have been established. The NFA is an unconstitutional restriction of the 2A, regardless of the Supreme Court decision saying its a legal tax.

IPNPULZ · Oct 28, 2020

JCOOR said: ↑

People are Burning Looting Murdering in cities across the country and the ATF is worried about a fucking arm brace. It’s time for them to be disbanded
Click to expand...

I think the point is they're looking at other things other than the brace, so they save face I think the brace won't be outlawed just reclassified a stock..... So I think its not going to be the brace that changes the rule

Sig45 · Oct 28, 2020

Everyone be careful in your boats....don't want any accidents.

IPNPULZ · Oct 28, 2020

Beretta4x4 said: ↑

They should never have been established. The NFA is an unconstitutional restriction of the 2A, regardless of the Supreme Court decision saying its a legal tax.
Click to expand...

This has some teeth in it as to the possible restrictions that could get enacted.....

YotaOverAll · Oct 28, 2020

Sig45 said: ↑

Everyone be careful in your boats....don't want any accidents.

Click to expand...

Damn I had the same thought...

Beretta4x4 · Oct 28, 2020

Sig45 said: ↑

Everyone be careful in your boats....don't want any accidents.

Click to expand...

As much as I like that joke, I think in this case civil disobedience needs to be open and in their face. Hiding stuff isolates those not complying. There's power in numbers.

Luckily, nothing firm has come out yet.
that they come to their senses.

IPNPULZ · Oct 28, 2020

Beretta4x4 · Oct 28, 2020

IPNPULZ said: ↑

Click to expand...

Went to the range today. I painted my pistol and wanted to confirm zero at 50 yards.

Warmonger88 · Oct 28, 2020

Doughnut Spaghetti said: ↑

Folding
Click to expand...

Dude, Try out Yankee Hill Machine. I bought a rear sight off a buddy to use with my original A2, changed the barrel out shortly after. I liked the rear sight so much, I bought the front sight off Midway to go with it. All steel, simple, sturdy, and easy adjustment.
This link is for the handguard height one. https://www.midwayusa.com/product/1003419597?pid=210278

TXpro4X4 · Oct 28, 2020

IPNPULZ said: ↑

Click to expand...

Looks familiar...

AR15xAR10 · Oct 29, 2020

Anyone interested in this?

YotaOverAll · Oct 29, 2020

I giv $7

AR15xAR10 · Oct 29, 2020

YotaOverAll said: ↑

I giv $7
Click to expand...

Add $273 and a hug, and you got a deal brother

YotaOverAll · Oct 29, 2020

AR15xAR10 said: ↑

Add $273 and a hug, and you got a deal brother
Click to expand...

9 doll hairs and 72 cents

Gearheadesw · Oct 30, 2020

Excellent, a bidding war on optics, I'm in...... 10 fiddy!

Sorry @YotaOverAll

TacoTRD78 · Oct 30, 2020

sub’d . I wonder what the percentage of Tacoma owners support the 2A

Gearheadesw · Oct 30, 2020

Most of us, just look in the emoji's.

golfindia · Oct 30, 2020

The brace issue is similar to 43p. Everyone knew the loopholes, and chose to fly very close to the sun......

The current solvent trap dilemma is also an interesting one. I've been very surprised that more people aren't blowing a gasket over Quietbore.

https://www.quietbore.com/category/atf-legalities/

They got bitch slapped and now need your Form 1 to sell you a tube.....

IPNPULZ · Oct 30, 2020

golfindia said: ↑

The brace issue is similar to 43p. Everyone knew the loopholes, and chose to fly very close to the sun......

The current solvent trap dilemma is also an interesting one. I've been very surprised that more people aren't blowing a gasket over Quietbore.

https://www.quietbore.com/category/atf-legalities/

They got bitch slapped and now need your Form 1 to sell you a tube.....
Click to expand...

I have been waiting for this... A local dealer here in the NOVA area was selling these at the Nations Gun Show and got popped by VA State Police and ATF and was forced to shut down.....All it took was a drill bit of the correct diameter to drill at the marked location (dimple) in the end of the outer tube and boom one awesome suppressor.....

Log in or Sign up

Welcome to Tacoma World!

AR-15 BS Thread

#21241
JCOOR Well-Known Member

#21242
Beretta4x4 What makes the green grass grow? TTC#0114

#21243
IPNPULZ Well-Known Member

#21244
Sig45 Well-Known Member

#21245
IPNPULZ Well-Known Member

#21246
YotaOverAll Backyard Performance

#21247
Beretta4x4 What makes the green grass grow? TTC#0114

#21248
IPNPULZ Well-Known Member

#21249
Beretta4x4 What makes the green grass grow? TTC#0114

#21250
Warmonger88 Member

#21251
TXpro4X4 Fuck Cancer!

#21252
AR15xAR10 AR10 is 5 ARs better

#21253
YotaOverAll Backyard Performance

#21254
AR15xAR10 AR10 is 5 ARs better

#21255
YotaOverAll Backyard Performance

#21256
Gearheadesw must modify

#21257
TacoTRD78 Well-Known Member

#21258
Gearheadesw must modify

#21259
golfindia Well-Known Member

#21260
IPNPULZ Well-Known Member

Products Discussed in

Log in or Sign up

Useful Searches

Welcome to Tacoma World!

AR-15 BS Thread

#21241 JCOOR Well-Known Member

#21242 Beretta4x4 What makes the green grass grow? TTC#0114

#21243 IPNPULZ Well-Known Member

#21244 Sig45 Well-Known Member

#21245 IPNPULZ Well-Known Member

#21246 YotaOverAll Backyard Performance

#21247 Beretta4x4 What makes the green grass grow? TTC#0114

#21248 IPNPULZ Well-Known Member

#21249 Beretta4x4 What makes the green grass grow? TTC#0114

#21250 Warmonger88 Member

#21251 TXpro4X4 Fuck Cancer!

#21252 AR15xAR10 AR10 is 5 ARs better

#21253 YotaOverAll Backyard Performance

#21254 AR15xAR10 AR10 is 5 ARs better

#21255 YotaOverAll Backyard Performance

#21256 Gearheadesw must modify

#21257 TacoTRD78 Well-Known Member

#21258 Gearheadesw must modify

#21259 golfindia Well-Known Member

#21260 IPNPULZ Well-Known Member

Products Discussed in Entire Site Forum: Guns & Hunting Thread: AR-15 BS Thread

#21241
JCOOR Well-Known Member

#21242
Beretta4x4 What makes the green grass grow? TTC#0114

#21243
IPNPULZ Well-Known Member

#21244
Sig45 Well-Known Member

#21245
IPNPULZ Well-Known Member

#21246
YotaOverAll Backyard Performance

#21247
Beretta4x4 What makes the green grass grow? TTC#0114

#21248
IPNPULZ Well-Known Member

#21249
Beretta4x4 What makes the green grass grow? TTC#0114

#21250
Warmonger88 Member

#21251
TXpro4X4 Fuck Cancer!

#21252
AR15xAR10 AR10 is 5 ARs better

#21253
YotaOverAll Backyard Performance

#21254
AR15xAR10 AR10 is 5 ARs better

#21255
YotaOverAll Backyard Performance

#21256
Gearheadesw must modify

#21257
TacoTRD78 Well-Known Member

#21258
Gearheadesw must modify

#21259
golfindia Well-Known Member

#21260
IPNPULZ Well-Known Member

Products Discussed in