1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

What tire size next?

Discussion in '2nd Gen. Tacomas (2005-2015)' started by SimonTaco, Nov 23, 2020.

  1. Nov 23, 2020 at 7:01 PM
    #1
    SimonTaco

    SimonTaco [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2020
    Member:
    #322096
    Messages:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Simon
    Vehicle:
    Tacoma 2012
    Stock
    Hey, running 2,5 inch lift and looking for next tire size what would fill the space good? I was looking at 265/75/16 wich would be close to 32 rn running stock size 245/75/16
    Any suggestions? As of gas millage whats the impact? Im doing about 300 miles/week so im considering that to
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Nov 23, 2020 at 7:03 PM
    #2
    Bishop84

    Bishop84 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2015
    Member:
    #172494
    Messages:
    12,003
    Gender:
    Male
    Definitely a 265/75R16 but stick to standard load and a moderate tire for better fuel savings.

    Large lugs and heavy 10 ply means fuel consumption.
     
    wi_taco and SimonTaco[OP] like this.
  3. Nov 24, 2020 at 1:13 AM
    #3
    Marshall R

    Marshall R Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2015
    Member:
    #156224
    Messages:
    4,876
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Marshall
    Vehicle:
    07 White TRD double cab
    none
    I'm not lifted, but 265/75/16 is as big as you can go without any real downsides. I don't think that size looks bad with, or without a mild lift. You could go bigger with your 2.5" lift without clearance problems. But if you go any bigger you start seeing loss of power unless you also re-gear as well as noticeably less fuel mileage. As far as off road performance is concerned the real world difference between a 32" and 33" tire is insignificant.

    If you rarely get off road then a standard P rated tire is fine, and will save you about $100 on a set of 4 over LT tires. But if you spend much time off road, or even on rough unimproved dirt/gravel roads an E rated tire is a lot tougher and less likely to be ruined.

    I have E rated 265/75/16's on my Tacoma and E rated 275/70/18's on my F150. The tires on both trucks are the same width as factory, are about 1" taller than stock and are 15 lbs each heavier than stock. But both have a mildly aggressive tread and fuel mileage on both trucks is identical compared to the stock factory tires.

    The ride is a little more firm, but once I got the air pressure figured out not objectionable at all. Tires that are wider than stock, are significantly taller than stock and with aggressive treads are what hurt fuel mileage. Such tires do tend to be heavier, but the weight alone isn't the problem.
     
    PinktacoDM84 and wi_taco like this.
  4. Nov 24, 2020 at 3:16 AM
    #4
    SimonTaco

    SimonTaco [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2020
    Member:
    #322096
    Messages:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Simon
    Vehicle:
    Tacoma 2012
    Stock
    Right on thanks dude
     
  5. Nov 24, 2020 at 4:52 AM
    #5
    pearing

    pearing Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2018
    Member:
    #261610
    Messages:
    5,199
    Gender:
    Male
    Wisconsin
    Vehicle:
    2015 SR5 quadcab
    I went with 255/85r16... BFG km3's. No noticeable performance difference... well maybe some MPG loss but not much given the bling factor. Noisy; but that just lets the deer know your coming. No rubbing on a 2 1/2 inch lift. Skinny 33 for the win...

    20201002_173431 (11).jpg
     
    erockintaco likes this.
  6. Nov 24, 2020 at 5:00 AM
    #6
    SimonTaco

    SimonTaco [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2020
    Member:
    #322096
    Messages:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Simon
    Vehicle:
    Tacoma 2012
    Stock
    Pic from the front?? Looks good from side lol
     
  7. Nov 24, 2020 at 6:44 AM
    #7
    pearing

    pearing Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2018
    Member:
    #261610
    Messages:
    5,199
    Gender:
    Male
    Wisconsin
    Vehicle:
    2015 SR5 quadcab
    Here is as close to front as I currently have...

    20201002_173451 (2).jpg 20201002_173548 (1).jpg
     
  8. Nov 24, 2020 at 7:36 AM
    #8
    SimonTaco

    SimonTaco [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2020
    Member:
    #322096
    Messages:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Simon
    Vehicle:
    Tacoma 2012
    Stock
    Is price a difference? Why going with skinny? For fuel economy,
     
  9. Nov 24, 2020 at 7:37 AM
    #9
    SimonTaco

    SimonTaco [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2020
    Member:
    #322096
    Messages:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Simon
    Vehicle:
    Tacoma 2012
    Stock
    Would that fit on stock 16 inch mags without spacers?
     
  10. Nov 24, 2020 at 11:08 AM
    #10
    D2.

    D2. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2016
    Member:
    #203759
    Messages:
    1,578
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Dan
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2009 Tacoma - access cab 4x4 2TR-FE
    Cruise Control install. Intermittent wipers Hood lights Bed Lights Sliders 3" lift 886's on Billy 5100's Icon AAL 285/75 R16 Falken Wildpeak AT3W's
    I can't speak for @pearing, but one of the benefits is not having to do the Cab mount chop ( or at least the possibility of not having to do it) and not running spacers.
     
    SimonTaco[QUOTED][OP] likes this.
  11. Nov 24, 2020 at 11:21 AM
    #11
    Hikerbox

    Hikerbox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2020
    Member:
    #320538
    Messages:
    331
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mike
    Vehicle:
    2015 SR5 Access Cab
    255/85/16 are really expensive, like almost $100/tire more expensive. I would definitely want to replace the spare too whereas you could probably get away with driving the stock space for a short distance with 32's.
    I just went from 265/70/16 to 265/75/16 on my snow tires and gained just under an inch of ride height, looks great with a basically leveled front.
     
    SimonTaco[OP] likes this.
  12. Nov 24, 2020 at 11:35 AM
    #12
    nd4spdbh

    nd4spdbh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2013
    Member:
    #114055
    Messages:
    14,598
    Gender:
    Male
    SoCal
    Vehicle:
    13 DCSB TRD OR v6 Auto
    Like stated, stick with a 265/75R16 in a less agressive tire and standard load rating. Might I suggest the Michelin Defender LTX M/S in the 116T rating (not the LT Load range E) in a 265/75R16. You flat out will not find a longer lasting, grippy in the dry, wet, icy roads, quieter, lighter tire.
     
    SimonTaco[OP] likes this.
  13. Nov 24, 2020 at 11:53 AM
    #13
    Armed in Utah

    Armed in Utah Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2017
    Member:
    #231704
    Messages:
    2,466
    Gender:
    Male
    Utah's High Desert.......
    Vehicle:
    2003 Lexus LX 470
    255-85x16's ..but will more than likely be E (LT) rated

    Better selection in the 265-75x16's in SL or 'LT' or E rated

    beefier tread depth too in LT Compare tire weights in your selections

    Watch for Cyber Monday sales next week....

    Your truck's intended use should help decide whether SL or LT

    My '14 shown...LT 265-75x16's... 2" lift using 886 coils & 5100s & AAL in rear

    [​IMG]
     
  14. Nov 24, 2020 at 12:17 PM
    #14
    SimonTaco

    SimonTaco [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2020
    Member:
    #322096
    Messages:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Simon
    Vehicle:
    Tacoma 2012
    Stock
    Doing hunting fishing and wook gravel roads a lot, im pretty sure with 265-75-16 i run something similare to your setup! Are you running spacers or no need? Offset mag?
     
  15. Nov 24, 2020 at 3:14 PM
    #15
    pearing

    pearing Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2018
    Member:
    #261610
    Messages:
    5,199
    Gender:
    Male
    Wisconsin
    Vehicle:
    2015 SR5 quadcab
    I wanted the tallest tire I could get without a major lift and modification to the truck. These are stock 16 x8 rims with a 33" tire. No rub. My lift is 3rd gen struts and a spacer with AAl's in back. Go wider=interference. Its preference. I like the look of a wider wheel, but in the end I spent less getting there (and got nicer tires.)

    Also-someone spouted off about tire cost. I bought GOOD tires, and you spend more for that. You can get Mile Star's for $100 less per tire; and, I looked at them but in the end you get what you pay for. I will get twice the mileage out of these (with alignments and rotations) versus those other less expensive tires.. I talked with a lot of people before I bought these. A more common size is less, but not $100 less (per tire)... Mileage was never a consideration... truck gets 20mpg on a good day so it sucks no matter.
     
    SimonTaco[QUOTED][OP] likes this.
  16. Nov 24, 2020 at 4:33 PM
    #16
    another395Taco

    another395Taco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2020
    Member:
    #321429
    Messages:
    107
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ben
    Fort Collins, CO
    Vehicle:
    2014 Red T/X Baja
    GFC v2 Platform Camper, skids, sliders, 2" lift
    How are you liking the Duratracs? We've got the same size & I've been a big fan in the snow, but gotten three flats this year in the desert with them so I'm thinking about switching.
     
  17. Nov 24, 2020 at 9:03 PM
    #17
    wiggler

    wiggler Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2020
    Member:
    #335252
    Messages:
    442
    Gender:
    Male
    HILO
    Vehicle:
    2013 OR AC 6MT & 1998 4Runner sr5 auto
    I vote 255/85/16, but you should also consider 235/85/16 I suppose.
     
  18. Nov 25, 2020 at 12:35 AM
    #18
    PinktacoDM84

    PinktacoDM84 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2020
    Member:
    #318972
    Messages:
    282
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Dan
    BC
    Vehicle:
    2015 trd OR/AC
    St Maxx on Trd pro wheels, mbrp exhaust, k&n cai, jba's, 887's over 5100's, medium dakars and 5125's.
    7EC55774-7B29-4FE5-9806-D745B2EDAD96.jpg
    265/75/16 st maxx, 887’s+5100’s up front, medium dakars+5125 in the rear. Would love the look and extra inch clearance 285’s offer but the cons outweigh the pros for me, cmc, either spacers or new offsets needed, poorer mileage and less power... plus I tow an 18’ boat in the summer which plays a big roll.
    I went with the coopers for a few reasons, one of them being they are exactly 32” in this size where as most come out to 31.5”.
    Thought about the pizza cutters but decided I’d rather have the .8” in width than loose it for the extra 1” in height.
    There’s a reason no one takes pics of 255’s straight from the front lol.
     
    SimonTaco[OP] likes this.
  19. Nov 25, 2020 at 12:38 AM
    #19
    PinktacoDM84

    PinktacoDM84 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2020
    Member:
    #318972
    Messages:
    282
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Dan
    BC
    Vehicle:
    2015 trd OR/AC
    St Maxx on Trd pro wheels, mbrp exhaust, k&n cai, jba's, 887's over 5100's, medium dakars and 5125's.
    Will also add that although everyone says you don’t ‘need’ uca’s until you go up 3”+... at 2.5” mine have allowed the tech to absolutely nail my alignment.
    Everything about driving this truck on and off road is better now than stock, at least for me.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top