1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

3.5 V6 vs the 4.0

Discussion in '3rd Gen. Tacomas (2016-2023)' started by peiscooter, Jan 4, 2021.

  1. Jan 4, 2021 at 8:38 AM
    #1
    peiscooter

    peiscooter [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2013
    Member:
    #95790
    Messages:
    159
    Gender:
    Male
    Prince Edward Island
    Vehicle:
    2021 TRD Sport
    Is the new engine more efficient than the old one?
     
    Junkhead likes this.
  2. Jan 4, 2021 at 8:39 AM
    #2
    RyanL

    RyanL Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Member:
    #73265
    Messages:
    3,472
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ryan
    Indiana
    Vehicle:
    15 TRD Pro, supercharged, BP-51s, etc
    Yes.

    Also,
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2021
  3. Jan 4, 2021 at 8:39 AM
    #3
    Skydvrr

    Skydvrr IG: @kalopsianick

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2017
    Member:
    #229889
    Messages:
    12,654
    First Name:
    Nick
    YMH
    Vehicle:
    Black '17 OR
    Yes!
    Wait no

    Idk

    Define efficient
     
  4. Jan 4, 2021 at 8:41 AM
    #4
    shakerhood

    shakerhood Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2015
    Member:
    #161370
    Messages:
    36,977
    Gender:
    Male
    Southern Ohio
    Vehicle:
    2017 MGM DCSB Off Road, 6 Speed MT, P&T
    Yes it gets better MPG if that is what you are asking
     
  5. Jan 4, 2021 at 8:42 AM
    #5
    Clearwater Bill

    Clearwater Bill Never answer an anonymous letter

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2014
    Member:
    #140097
    Messages:
    24,363
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Billy
    Largo Florida
    Vehicle:
    '13 5 lug AC w/convenience package
    A few OE parts from fancy trucks
    Define efficiency.

    And it can't be based on MPG, 'cause that has too many other factors in play.

    Do you mean something like HP/CI @ 'x' RPM or something tangible? Well, tangible to bench racing anyway.
     
    hiPSI and Chew like this.
  6. Jan 4, 2021 at 8:42 AM
    #6
    peiscooter

    peiscooter [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2013
    Member:
    #95790
    Messages:
    159
    Gender:
    Male
    Prince Edward Island
    Vehicle:
    2021 TRD Sport

    I guess thats what I was thinking...
     
  7. Jan 4, 2021 at 8:43 AM
    #7
    Natetroknot

    Natetroknot Experiencing TW at several WTFs per thread

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Member:
    #33812
    Messages:
    1,489
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Nate
    Dubuque, IA
    Vehicle:
    19 Sport AC-6MT
    Boy I sure hope so
     
    RJ_MacReady, rsimi72 and Junkhead like this.
  8. Jan 4, 2021 at 8:43 AM
    #8
    NewMexiMan

    NewMexiMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2020
    Member:
    #332752
    Messages:
    187
    Vehicle:
    2016 SR 5 Speed
    It more efficiently generates complaints.
     
  9. Jan 4, 2021 at 8:45 AM
    #9
    Clearwater Bill

    Clearwater Bill Never answer an anonymous letter

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2014
    Member:
    #140097
    Messages:
    24,363
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Billy
    Largo Florida
    Vehicle:
    '13 5 lug AC w/convenience package
    A few OE parts from fancy trucks
    Then the answer might be that the 'truck' is more fuel efficient.

    But not enough to get excited about. Nor spend a bunch of money for that purpose only.

    It would be a C class 'pro' on a prioritized pro / con list. :D
     
    Chew, Tacospike and RyanL like this.
  10. Jan 4, 2021 at 8:46 AM
    #10
    peiscooter

    peiscooter [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2013
    Member:
    #95790
    Messages:
    159
    Gender:
    Male
    Prince Edward Island
    Vehicle:
    2021 TRD Sport
    Things I remember from my 2012 Sport...winter mpg is terrible.....otherwise returned the same mpg no matter how you drove it.
     
    Junkhead and shakerhood like this.
  11. Jan 4, 2021 at 8:47 AM
    #11
    Captqc

    Captqc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Member:
    #212458
    Messages:
    5,149
    Gender:
    Male
    Tigard, OR
    Vehicle:
    2017 Tacoma 4x4 TRD AC Off Road
    Here’s the dope on the 3.5.
     

    Attached Files:

  12. Jan 4, 2021 at 8:48 AM
    #12
    shakerhood

    shakerhood Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2015
    Member:
    #161370
    Messages:
    36,977
    Gender:
    Male
    Southern Ohio
    Vehicle:
    2017 MGM DCSB Off Road, 6 Speed MT, P&T
    I had a couple prior 4.0 2nd Gens before and this one does around 1 to 1.5 MPG average better. However if I drive this truck easy it can increase.
     
    Junkhead likes this.
  13. Jan 4, 2021 at 8:51 AM
    #13
    Clearwater Bill

    Clearwater Bill Never answer an anonymous letter

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2014
    Member:
    #140097
    Messages:
    24,363
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Billy
    Largo Florida
    Vehicle:
    '13 5 lug AC w/convenience package
    A few OE parts from fancy trucks
    That's because of winter blend gas, aka gvmt meddling.

    All vehicles MPG drop in the winter, particularly if living in areas like yours.
     
    CygnusX191 and Junkhead like this.
  14. Jan 4, 2021 at 8:53 AM
    #14
    Junkhead

    Junkhead TRDude

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2019
    Member:
    #284671
    Messages:
    15,665
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Serge
    Prince George, BC
    Vehicle:
    Black 4x4 Sport MT 2018
    Some Serious Tires
    Its better on gas, yes. My buddy had 2nd gen and 3rd gen and says the same thing.

    Right now im getting 17-18 city driving, and 20-21 hwy if not going faster than 65-70.

    Summer it improves a little. IMO those are great numbers for a heavy truck on 265/70/17 C load AT tires.
     
  15. Jan 4, 2021 at 8:54 AM
    #15
    Rock Lobster

    Rock Lobster Thread Derailer

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2018
    Member:
    #275833
    Messages:
    13,200
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ryan
    Dee Eff Dub
    Vehicle:
    I drive a Miata.
    Define terrible.

    MPG has so many variables that the engine is not even in the top 10 of most contributing factors for a Tacoma. Some people get 25, some people get 8. I can't say for sure where anyone will land on that bell curve.
     
    CygnusX191, ozpall and Junkhead like this.
  16. Jan 4, 2021 at 8:57 AM
    #16
    Tacoma13_NC

    Tacoma13_NC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2020
    Member:
    #344149
    Messages:
    1,170
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2013 SR5 4x4 DCSB 4.0L (Black) OTT
    Bilstein 6112/5160; JBA HD UCAs; 1.5" 3-Leaf AAL's w/ overload; OME CB drop; RCI aluminum skids w/ catalytic converter shields; Wheeler's U-Bolt flip kit with Superbumps; TRD Pro 4-Runner Wheels; BFG KO2's (265/70/17); Diode Dynamics SS3 Sport (Yellow) fogs; CaliRaised 32" hidden light bar; Morimoto XB LED headlights with upgraded HD harness; Unifilter mod; Rear-View mirror riser bracket; Truxedo Lo Pro tonneau cover; New OEM color-matched grille; Bumpershellz color-matched rear bumper cover; Ultra-Gauge MX 1.4 w/Spiker mount; Baja Designs S2 Sport Ditch Lights with SDHQ brackets; Fog Light Anytime Mod; Overland Tailor Tune (OTT)
    There's no replacement for displacement.
     
    MT4x4Tacoma, Smokinnuts and Steadfast like this.
  17. Jan 4, 2021 at 8:58 AM
    #17
    Taco1701

    Taco1701 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2014
    Member:
    #121871
    Messages:
    850
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    William
    GA
    Vehicle:
    2020 DCSB TRD Sport 4x4 Cement
    My 2008 with the 4.0 was 2wd and all stock and I averaged 17.9 mpg. My 2020 is 4wd with one size larger tires and I'm averaging 18.9 mpg overall. So, it's more efficient, but not a huge difference. There's also a ton of variables that impact that, so your results may vary.
     
    CygnusX191 likes this.
  18. Jan 4, 2021 at 8:59 AM
    #18
    Koolbreeze7

    Koolbreeze7 GRILL MAN

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2017
    Member:
    #217306
    Messages:
    1,785
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jon
    Jersey
    Vehicle:
    2017 TRD Sport 4x4 DCLB Black, Trail Limo. RIP- 2009, 2000, 91,89,87 trucks
    Rigid pod fogs, SpartanX stealth grill and hood LED's, 17" SEMA's on 275/70/17 Falken Wildpeak AT3W's, Fox 2.0 on all corners , TRD CAI, LEER 100XQ Blacked out, w/ Thule racks, and Cargo slider Flow master American Thunder "dual" exhaust, remote start, tint, TRD Pro grill and TRD shadow graphics, Alcan custom 8 leaf Spring Pack
    Interesting that it lists 91 octane ( Plus) for minimum fuel required.
     
    Lt. Dangle, Tacolife5 and V1cmlb like this.
  19. Jan 4, 2021 at 9:00 AM
    #19
    Gearheadesw

    Gearheadesw must modify

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2012
    Member:
    #76139
    Messages:
    5,089
    Gender:
    Male
    Davenport Fl
    Vehicle:
    1 truck 1 car 1 motorcycle
    Stock to stock trucks, yes. These 2 engines operate on different ends of the spectrum.
     
    Junkhead likes this.
  20. Jan 4, 2021 at 9:00 AM
    #20
    Junkhead

    Junkhead TRDude

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2019
    Member:
    #284671
    Messages:
    15,665
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Serge
    Prince George, BC
    Vehicle:
    Black 4x4 Sport MT 2018
    Some Serious Tires
    Haha! It has like 40 more hp on stock tune, i will run circles around a 2nd gen. I proved it to myself a couple times now. 4.0 is done at 5k rpms, 3.5 just keeps on going...
     

Products Discussed in

To Top