Still think TITNC3: Return of the Iceberg was peak

AMC CLOV CLNE BB WISH KOSS etc. of course

 

Ah, the retard ETF. Excellent strategy

 

I don't count those as plays. They're dice rolls. lol

 

NCTY might have some more gas in the can...if it's above 18 tomorrow, it's got room to 25.

CLNE is running...up in AH, gonna be a nice gap hopefully tomorrow.

 

I forgot you where caught in that as well. If it ever goes I'll be stoked. Until then I'm bitter. Not as bitter as I am at ARK but close. lol

 

How's ARK doing, I haven't looked at any of those in a while.

I'm mad at ICLN and CRSR currently.

 

ARK's not doing shit. I'm down almost 20% on my "safe" play. It's gonna be a while before it hits break even. I've thought about just taking the loss but I'm gonna try this new thing called buy and hold. lol

 

Don’t worry, she just sees what stocks Reddit thinks are cool, buys them up, then Reddit sees she bought them, and they buy them up more. Problem is Reddit crowd has all their money in Meme stocks right now. When that ends, they’ll follow her again and ARK will bounce back

 

We must’ve bought right around same time. I’m in the same situation but that’s one that for now I’ll leave it and let it come up half a percent or one percent a day. Eventually it’ll break even. Plus once pltr goes up In correlation to the amount of contracts they picked up, ark will move. Right now PLTR is slowly climbing but not nearly as much as one would think with all the new contracts they have picked up.

 

I've been waiting for a dip to average down on. If it heads below $1.50 I'm buying another 6000 shares.

 

I might sink another 2k into it, but that’s about it.

 

the 1 dollar mark was a good time to do so...
i managed to drop a whole dollar off my avg.

it left a bottoming tail today at $1.5 resistance...maybe it'll go up?

 

I bought some $GENE calls on a lark..but it's looking like the trapped short just "reshorted" with some vodoo bullshit...

 

Then the short wasn’t trapped I guess

 

After all the children settled down... Thought is they had to "normalize" the vote just to make it official. If they posted 150m votes when there couldn't be, it could be illegitimate... Atleast that's what I gather.

@kairo do you agree?

 

The vote tally doesn't make sense regardless. If there was really 55M votes that would mean everyone voted and they all owned a single share. You vote once regardless of shares owned. So, let's just say everyone has 10 shares on average, it's probably higher but whatever, the means that there's 550M shares that people voting actually own. Unless they count the one vote and then add how many shares that one vote has. IDK, honestly.

 

Yah, lawyer extraordinaire Wes Christian and Susanne Trimbath both discussed last month that the vote count "has to be normalized" for the way the report works. There's really no way it can show up on the 8F as being over the amount of total shares by rule. (Another fantastically useless and anti-punitive rule).

There's 0 doubt in my mind that the vote count is much higher. GME's legal team will be working with the SEC (who requested voting details from GME earlier today). Everybody knows, it's one big open secret nobody is allowed to officially say anything about until the lawyers do their lawyering.

As far as the thesis is concerned, nothing changes, and 5m shares are entering the market which won't even be bought to cover shorts with.

Hdg still fuk

 

If……(you know the rest )