1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

K & N Filter Performance question

Discussion in 'Performance and Tuning' started by Shawman20, Feb 6, 2011.

  1. Feb 6, 2011 at 6:12 PM
    #1
    Shawman20

    Shawman20 [OP] Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Member:
    #47850
    Messages:
    6
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Joshua
    Brewer, ME
    Vehicle:
    11 Tacoma SR5 Double Cab V6
    100% Factory
    I installed a direct replacement k & n filter on my taco, and the first 2 tanks of fuel with the filter installed have been the worst mpg since I have had the truck. Has anyone else experienced a loss of performance with the k & n filter over the stock filter?
     
  2. Feb 6, 2011 at 6:15 PM
    #2
    JDMcQ

    JDMcQ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Member:
    #10561
    Messages:
    39,046
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    The Mushroom Capital of the World
    The tests that I have read indicate that the gain from an aftermarket filter is negligible at typical engine speeds, on top of that, they do not filter as well as the stock type paper filter.
     
  3. Feb 6, 2011 at 7:40 PM
    #3
    chris4x4

    chris4x4 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. Moderator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    Member:
    #6497
    Messages:
    112,751,530
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    FlimFlubberJAM
    Tenoe, AZ
    Vehicle:
    2019 Rubicon 4 Door,
    4.10 gears, sliders, and lots of buttons.
    This ^^^^
     
  4. Feb 6, 2011 at 8:24 PM
    #4
    Chris(NJ)

    Chris(NJ) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Member:
    #29777
    Messages:
    4,876
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Chris
    Usually in Central Jersey
    Vehicle:
    08 Indigo 4x4 DC OR
    Mods are currently being changed .....
  5. Feb 6, 2011 at 8:38 PM
    #5
    Mod

    Mod Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2010
    Member:
    #40950
    Messages:
    1,787
    Gender:
    Male
    CR, WA
    Vehicle:
    1999 8 port 3RZ 4WD SR5
    stock
  6. Feb 6, 2011 at 8:40 PM
    #6
    Sproulesxrunner

    Sproulesxrunner Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2010
    Member:
    #45328
    Messages:
    530
    Gender:
    Male
    Canada
    Vehicle:
    08 Xrunner
    Too much for TW to know
    I personally never noticed any gain in MPG or HP. I don't think I lost any MPGs however.What is your definition of "worst miles per gallon"? How drastic of decrease are you talking about?
     
  7. Feb 8, 2011 at 5:00 PM
    #7
    Shawman20

    Shawman20 [OP] Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Member:
    #47850
    Messages:
    6
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Joshua
    Brewer, ME
    Vehicle:
    11 Tacoma SR5 Double Cab V6
    100% Factory
    I was getting around 15 mpg around town and the last 2 tanks were both 13.7 mpg. I would consider that a significant decrease. I haven't had a chance to do a highway mileage tank with the filter in yet.
     
  8. Feb 9, 2011 at 1:37 PM
    #8
    Yamaha Dave

    Yamaha Dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2010
    Member:
    #34080
    Messages:
    2,674
    Gender:
    Male


    Actually this is normal and will happen with any high flow filter until the ECU can recalibrate itself after a few hundred miles. What I'd recommend is you disconnect the battery, pump the brake pedal for 15 seconds, leave the battery disconnected for 15 mins. Reconnect and put a few hundred miles on it.
     
  9. Mar 5, 2011 at 10:04 PM
    #9
    Copacetic

    Copacetic New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Member:
    #52124
    Messages:
    3
    Gender:
    Male
    So Cal
    Vehicle:
    07 TRD Offroad
    K&N CAI Magnaflow Muffler
    Before I put on my K&N CAI I was getting about 18.0-18.7. After I put it on my first tank averaged out to 17.9, but I do admit to driving it harder right after I put it on. After I started driving normally my MPG is staying around 18.4 to 19.3. Oh and its an 07 access cab V6.
     
  10. Mar 5, 2011 at 10:09 PM
    #10
    bowhunter11199

    bowhunter11199 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2010
    Member:
    #45854
    Messages:
    1,018
    Gender:
    Male
    well in my case i dont know if i got any better mpg cuz few things are electric(98 taco) put i thought i could feel a little gain in power. but i didn't just buy their filter i did the whole cold air intake.
     
  11. Mar 6, 2011 at 5:59 AM
    #11
    Janster

    Janster Old & Forgetful

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Member:
    #1138
    Messages:
    14,339
    Gender:
    Female
    First Name:
    Jandy
    Lancaster, PA
    Vehicle:
    2016 GMC Canyon SLT w/ LineX and....
    I ran with K&N and open deckplate for years on my 1st gen - and I gained about 2mpg.

    Currently, I have an AFE on the 07 and other similar upgrades that I had on the 1st gen.....and I haven't seen any improvements. These 2nd gen trucks just don't respond to normal 'mpg' type upgrades. My 1st gen truck never had a decrease of MPG in the winter at all. These 2nd gen trucks don't like the winter gas or the cold temperatures.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top