1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

DCLB vs Tundra double cab

Discussion in '3rd Gen. Tacomas (2016-2023)' started by skifishbum, Mar 19, 2022.

  1. Mar 19, 2022 at 6:38 PM
    #1
    skifishbum

    skifishbum [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2018
    Member:
    #242393
    Messages:
    265
    Reno, NV
    Vehicle:
    17 DCSB -> 22 DCLB
    Hey All, traded a Tacoma short bed in for a tundra with a 6.5 bed about 5 months ago. Have a crazy offer from someone to purchase it where I’ll end up profiting by 5k (after tax even). Hard to turn down.

    Debating whether I want to go 2nd gen tundra again given the gas prices and longterm exposure. Was averaging 14 with 33s e rated tires in the tundra (5.50 per gallon here). Drove the 3rd gen tundra and was not a fan. Currently have a sleeping platform and a midrise shell on the tundra. Perfect desert camping rig due to the space. We don’t tow anything so I know it’s a bit overkill.

    What kind of mpg should I expect from a long bed Tacoma with a plywood / high rise camper shell? Any mods needed to handle basic camping weight and Mtb’s ? 2022 Tacoma seemed to drive way better than my 2017 did. Not totally sure how much is due to actual changes vs my mods. I went a bit overboard with my last Tacoma and want to keep my next rig as stock as possible.

    2017 short bed Tacoma mpg for fun below…

    A63450DC-A743-4313-8B5A-C7D25B282F88.jpg
     
    kas2828 likes this.
  2. Mar 19, 2022 at 11:41 PM
    #2
    kas2828

    kas2828 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2020
    Member:
    #333434
    Messages:
    430
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Austin
    Arizona
    Vehicle:
    2020 TRD Off-road 4x4 DCLB
    I have a 2020 longbed with a softopper and 33 e load tires. I try and keep weigh down for the daily driving. I have full steel skids and nothing in the bed unless going camping. I get 16-17 mpg.
     
  3. Mar 20, 2022 at 5:51 AM
    #3
    Fredk

    Fredk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2020
    Member:
    #336782
    Messages:
    474
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Fred
    Vehicle:
    Dark grey 2020
    I came from a 17 Tundra and the mileage wasn't much different.
     
  4. Mar 20, 2022 at 5:54 AM
    #4
    Thegenerik1

    Thegenerik1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2013
    Member:
    #109954
    Messages:
    3,426
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Erik
    NorCal
    Vehicle:
    18 DCLB OR
    Same as your short bed Tacoma.
     
  5. Mar 20, 2022 at 6:02 AM
    #5
    85GT 79FJ40

    85GT 79FJ40 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2010
    Member:
    #47768
    Messages:
    1,113
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ken
    New Hampshire
    Vehicle:
    19 TRD Sport DCSB 6M - 2017 Honda Africa Twin
    Add the same size tires you had on your last one and it'll get exactly the same mileage. It's the same truck besides a little more tech. My DCLB is stock and I average about 20MPG. The 4Runner I just traded for it was on 285's. Same exact driving and habits... 15.5-16.
     
    skifishbum[OP] likes this.
  6. Mar 20, 2022 at 8:35 AM
    #6
    skifishbum

    skifishbum [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2018
    Member:
    #242393
    Messages:
    265
    Reno, NV
    Vehicle:
    17 DCSB -> 22 DCLB
    Stock Tacoma shouldn’t get that bad (13mpg) with like 300 pounds of weight in bed. No gfc,33 tires, armor, lift, etc this time.
     
  7. Mar 20, 2022 at 9:15 AM
    #7
    skifishbum

    skifishbum [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2018
    Member:
    #242393
    Messages:
    265
    Reno, NV
    Vehicle:
    17 DCSB -> 22 DCLB
    I am getting around 14 combined in the tundra. 16 on highway. Would be saving around 1200 to 1500 a year depending on gas prices (assuming I can get 18 with stock tires). Drive about 18k per year.
     
    kas2828[QUOTED] likes this.
  8. Mar 20, 2022 at 1:37 PM
    #8
    TacoVErmont30

    TacoVErmont30 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2021
    Member:
    #351838
    Messages:
    100
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2021 DCLB OR
    I get about 15 average with 33 e loads overland rack and tent
     
  9. Mar 20, 2022 at 4:52 PM
    #9
    Thegenerik1

    Thegenerik1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2013
    Member:
    #109954
    Messages:
    3,426
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Erik
    NorCal
    Vehicle:
    18 DCLB OR
    My point was the DCLB will get the same as the DCSB. Of course adding weight, bigger tires etc will hurt them both.
     
  10. Mar 21, 2022 at 9:51 PM
    #10
    skifishbum

    skifishbum [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2018
    Member:
    #242393
    Messages:
    265
    Reno, NV
    Vehicle:
    17 DCSB -> 22 DCLB
    Commenting to update everyone in case someone in the future has the same question.

    Switched back to the OEM tires on the tundra and got 16 mpg driving up to Tahoe and 21 down. Definitely on par with Tacoma mpg but have a way more powerful engine and camping space.

    keeping the tundra. Maybe one day I will be back in a Taco! Thanks everyone for feedback.
     
    dirtnsmores likes this.
  11. Jun 27, 2023 at 8:41 AM
    #11
    dirtnsmores

    dirtnsmores A camping truck

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Member:
    #165069
    Messages:
    3,307
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mike
    Southern California
    Vehicle:
    06 DCLB Prerunner
    OME885/5100, DAKAR MED-DUTY, SOFTOPPER
    I know this is an old thread, but I'm wondering how the leg room in the back is compared to the Tacoma. Considering up ready to a full-size, but I don't want crew cab tundra
     

Products Discussed in

To Top