1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Is the second gen Tacoma IFS any stronger than the 1st gen?

Discussion in '2nd Gen. Tacomas (2005-2015)' started by Ozark_RegCab, Jun 23, 2023.

  1. Jun 23, 2023 at 6:17 PM
    #1
    Ozark_RegCab

    Ozark_RegCab [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2021
    Member:
    #354648
    Messages:
    6,226
    First Name:
    Nick
    Northwest Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    1996 Tacoma SR5 4x4 5 speed
    Sliders, lift, 275/70/17
    I don't beat on my truck hard enough to worry about things breaking, but I'm still curious what people think that see a lot of off road miles. I've just been curious since some say the CVs are the same size, with negligible change in strength, while some claim they're "worlds stronger," perhaps due to improved alloys and/or metallurgy. The 8" diff would logically be more robust than the 7.5", but is it still stronger given the increase in weight from the first gen trucks? Ditto with the rear axle with the apparently larger shafts in the second gens.

    I have noticed a few more threads on broken spindles on the second gen forum, however.

    I'd be curious to hear any insights on how your IFS has held up compared to the older design.
     
    Last edited: Jun 23, 2023
  2. Jun 23, 2023 at 6:29 PM
    #2
    TnShooter

    TnShooter The TacomaWorld Stray

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2010
    Member:
    #42625
    Messages:
    21,392
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Deogee
    Vehicle:
    07' TRD Off-Road, Auto
    STOCK
    The ball joint design is better.
    The CVs can still break.
    If you wheel hard, get gusseted spindles.

    For the most part, if break a 2nd Gen IFS, it was due to neglect or wheeled it too hard.
    1st vs 2nd Gen? I’d say the 2nd is slightly stronger. But you can still break stuff.
     
  3. Jun 23, 2023 at 10:40 PM
    #3
    TacoTuesday1

    TacoTuesday1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2019
    Member:
    #296781
    Messages:
    7,776
    Gender:
    Male
    SD CA
    Never had a first gen. Kinda wish I did. It’s cheaper. More money for mods.

    2nd gen stock IFS works up to like 33”. I have warfab tie rod sleeves, gusseted spindles, UCA, etc

    Greasable ball joints

    Any more than that is not in my budget. There’s more options above that.
    -solid axle
    -longer travel
    -fabbed LCA’s
    -RCLT
    -portals
    -stronger axle metal

    another weak point is factory LCA mounting tabs on the frame without reinforcements

    Put 35’s on it, lockers, wheeling with low tire pressure
    And you start running the risk of breaking stock axles/CV’s and needing to do a trail side repair to limp it back home

    I forget the front IFS diff size. It’s a common one. Rarely hard of one breaking.
    Depends what kind of wheeling you do

    but yeah with most stock trucks and not being some high end model
    with a C channel frame
    They’re not gonna climb up a wall without issue right out of the box

    cheaper the truck more and better mods you can do
    Which at this mileage you’d do anyway
    provided the truck in question doesn’t have PITA problem areas to deal with
    such as early head gaskets
    Or 6-speed manuals with the multiple problems they have

    New truck usually means paying a shit ton of money for something that is stock and rides on $200 pencil shocks
     
    Ozark_RegCab[OP] likes this.
  4. Jun 24, 2023 at 2:19 AM
    #4
    6 gearT444E

    6 gearT444E Certified Electron Pusher

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2018
    Member:
    #243372
    Messages:
    7,798
    Deep South
    Herculiner Hootus
    how is that? 4 small bolts vs 2 larger ones. very larger complaints of the mounts breaking on the 1st gen vs 2nd.
     
  5. Jun 24, 2023 at 5:59 AM
    #5
    Ozark_RegCab

    Ozark_RegCab [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2021
    Member:
    #354648
    Messages:
    6,226
    First Name:
    Nick
    Northwest Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    1996 Tacoma SR5 4x4 5 speed
    Sliders, lift, 275/70/17
    Are you talking about the ball joints? They’re compression-loaded on the second gen. IMO the tension-loaded design was lazy at best from Toyota. It seemed to be a carry over from the torsion bar IFS without accounting for the A-arms which might eventually force the joint downwards out of the socket.
     
  6. Jun 24, 2023 at 6:01 AM
    #6
    Ozark_RegCab

    Ozark_RegCab [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2021
    Member:
    #354648
    Messages:
    6,226
    First Name:
    Nick
    Northwest Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    1996 Tacoma SR5 4x4 5 speed
    Sliders, lift, 275/70/17
    Hm, I wasn’t aware there were problems with the 6-speed manuals. I rarely hear about problems with the earlier 5 speed boxes.
     
  7. Jun 24, 2023 at 8:10 AM
    #7
    TnShooter

    TnShooter The TacomaWorld Stray

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2010
    Member:
    #42625
    Messages:
    21,392
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Deogee
    Vehicle:
    07' TRD Off-Road, Auto
    STOCK
    I meant the 2 Gen ball joints were better. The 1st gen went through what? 3 different bolts types and grades.

    The 2nd gen uses 2 big bolts. I believe they torque over 100 ft/lbs each.
     
    6 gearT444E[QUOTED] likes this.
  8. Jun 24, 2023 at 8:02 PM
    #8
    TacoTuesday1

    TacoTuesday1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2019
    Member:
    #296781
    Messages:
    7,776
    Gender:
    Male
    SD CA
    Normally, a manual is more reliable. I went into mine thinking that, not knowing the reality of the design.
    Early 5-speeds did work, because Toyota designed them like a regular functional 5-speed.

    The RA60F 6-speed is different. And they kept doing this with the 3rd gen.
    1. It had a ton of revisions, suggesting they could not get it right
    2. The TOB was designed wrong
    3. They never made a fix for that
    4. Rumor has it they also failed to blue loctite reverse collar bolt threads in the factory, making it a matter of time before it backs out and fails
    5. Supposedly gear ratios in it change over time, or at least a better 6th in the FJ

    Instead of the TOB having a replaceable cheap sleeve like very other vehicle on the road, they decided to make it a part of the bellhousing itself (cast), and not separately replaceable if it ever wears out
    Kind of like building an engine with one built in oil filter that can never be removed, and no drain plug

    the best solution to the TOB right now is probably piecing together a Tilton HydroTOB kit; they do not make an off the shelf plug and play kit. That's time and money, not even including parts replacement cost of regular clutch components themselves, and usually having to yank the trans out to go in there prematurely to handle this.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top