4th Gen Tacoma (2024+)

Mine only have 41,500 miles on them, no tears yet…better not at that mileage! Do notice the material is starting to fray here and there though.

 

The Pro displayed to the press is probably one configuration without any major options. The Trail Hunter will be interesting to see what's included and what's optional. The ARB rollbar/lightbar might be a dealer accessory, for example.

 

Your Taco seat was designed for fat American asses. The FJ seat was designed for the Japanese probably

 

It looks Geo Metro cheap to me too.

 

So the Ranger MPG numbers just got published:

2.3L 2WD 21/25/22
2.3L 4WD 20/24/22
3.0L Raptor 16/18/17

And the 2023 Canyon(All have same tune):

2.7L 2WD 18/23/20
2.7L 4WD 17/21/19
2.7L 4WD Mud Tires 17/20/18
2.7L AT4X 16/16/16

And the Colorado with the lower output tune:
2WD 20/25/22 4WD 19/23/21


I really don't see a way the the 2.4T(non hybrid) Tacoma will do any better than these numbers.

 

I'm not seeing how the TH is 5K more than the Pro. They both have the i-Force Max, ARB bumpers, larger flares, heritage grille, different wheels, 2.5" EMU/Fox, skid plates, etc. TH may have the utility bar and compressor as standard but Pro has the Iso seats and TRD intake/exhaust standard. If these prices are off then all the prices are suspect.

 

Just throw a seat cover with daffy duck on it and you're set

 

I like the 2.3 Ranger 4x4 numbers....the chevy numbers are trash

 

Curious what the V6 Ranger will come in at. Same as Bronco V6 probs.

 

The 2.7L Bronco is at 19/21/20, 18/18/18(Black Diamond), 17/17/17(Badlands and Sasquatch) and Raptor 3.0 is at 15/16/15. So maybe a +2 bump for the 2.7 Ranger over the Bronco based off that is what the bump is for the Raptor. May a +3 if you go by the 2.3L Bronco numbers over the Ranger.

 

There are a lot of unknowns as far as tune etc, but the Land Cruiser 250 probably has the same drivetrain with the I force max and Toyota and Toyota Canada are still showing projected 27mpg for that one. So its possible that the numbers are better. Considering the LC is all time 4wd (I think) and similar weight.

 

I would agree, but I am basing my opinion off of it should have a higher starting price over last year based on the hybrid engine alone.

 

Also those number really make me feel good about the 3rd gen, I'm matching or seeing better numbers than those on my current truck..lol

 

Interesting, TRDjon's TRD OR non-premium video just got made private?



So far:
SR and SR5 - 245/70-17 (31")
TRD OR - 265/70-17 (32")

Based on the videos, the SR5 caliper clearance will preclude fitting 16" wheels.

 

There is going to be the EPA numbers, Toyota numbers, and real world numbers......all different for sure. Still comes down to how many smiles per gallon am i going to get and I am happy with whatever that is.

 

Toyotajeff's video on the SR got made private too. Interesting.

 

Wonder why....he did not tell us anything we did not already know. Toyota Jeff's seems to be gone too. Toyota must have cracked their whip.

 

Using those numbers it could track with a lot of other Toyota hybrid vs non hybrids There are a couple that have a 1500-2000 premium over the non hybrid, there isn't that big of a gap with a lot of the other hybrids over non hybrid.

 

Guess they said or did something they weren't supposed to...

 

I thought turbos were supposed to be saving gas and the earth?