4th Gen Tacoma (2024+)

I feel like they missed the mark with the iForce (non-MAX) pricing. All trims to date are $5,000 (possibly more) above the point where people will even begin to think about buying one. This puts them in a bit of a pickle as far as the MAX models go.

 

I used to think is was crazy for anyone to spend $53,000 for a Tacoma Pro.

 

The 2024s are not going to sell at the currently planned price points.

 

I get the feeling they are going to put the Hybrid on top of a mandatory Premium Package, $$$$$$$$$$$$.

 

The price trajectory is definitely up.

I need to search back and find the comments about 65 and 70k Tacomas. When a lot of people were saying that was insane. Doesn’t seem so now.

 

A Limited Tacoma (there are no options except mudflaps) is 53.6K. A similarly equipped Limited Tundra is 61.2K, a $7,600 difference.

Using that math with the Tundra Pro costing 74K, the Tacoma Pro will be 74-7.6= $66,400.

 

Is it possible to see a real-time list of TSBs for the 2024 Tacoma (or any other model)?

Thanks.

 

This is what an extra $11,700 gets you on a ZR2:

ALL FEATURES INCLUDED WITH ZR2 BISON EDITION:

• AEV steel skid plates
• AEV stamped steel front and rear bumpers
• 17" LT315/70R17 blackwall 35" OD MT tires
• 17" Beadlock capable carbon flash metallic wheels
• AEV wheel flares
• Multimatic Jounce Control Dampers
• Bed-Mounted Vertical Spare Tire Carrier
• All-weather floor liner, with AEV logo
• AEV branded front head restraints
• Black AEV® and Colorado exterior badging
• ZR2 Bison Pick-up bed side decal

I think the Pro/TH upgrade over an OR is a better package for (likely) less money.

 

Exactly why I went RR. 59,425 loaded w/bead-lock capable wheels.

 

Jounce?

 

Bison has jounce dampers on all four corners. Pro has rear dampers only.

 

Not saying your choice is wrong but I want ventilated seats. That's worth at least 1K. 23 vs 17 combined mpg means a 3K savings over just four years. Minor things like a larger horizontal vs vertical display are important to me. The price difference, when you factor in additional tech/options and operating costs, is not that different.

 

We were down in FL a couple weeks ago with my wife’s Grand Highlander, which has ventilated seats and it was great! Definitely worth it in that environment. I could see the benefit being higher when it’s much hotter too.

 

Sport with 265/18s and a 1.5" leveling kit looks pretty good. Rear fender creases almost makes it look like a stepside.

 

Well... in Montana they can't keep them on the lots.

 

New word for me. I dun gone learned me something today. Thanks.

 

I'm fine without the ventilated seats. The front locker, 2.5 fox shocks, long travel suspension, AWD and 4 ft between wheel wells convinced me go this route. I'd prefer a horizontal display too although the roomier ( not by a whole lot ) back seat is a bonus. This time around I was looking for a turn key ride, not getting involved with modifications.....tires, suspension, bumpers etc.....the mileage is the same as my lifted 20 off-road with wild peaks that aren't quite 33s. Some reported close to 20 mpg even.

 

Well, not knowing how many they are getting gives zero idea what this statement means.

 

You sound like you need the ZR2 bison edition.

 

He just described the Ranger Raptor...