Whatever

a gross is 144

 

https://youtu.be/FQMbXvn2RNI?si=rVSlaaRndEQ6hmjx

 

best neighbor ever, family lost a patriarch last week, I grilt up these for them.....

 

I mean.....34 years ago, hopefully those problems have been corrected.

Frontier. I've had 2 Tundras, full size aint my cup o tea. Although my first Tundra was basically the same size as my current Tacoma.

 

um, uh, huh, who, um, uh, wood, uh, um, have, um, uh, known, uh, um, yep, uh, gosh, uh, um, I, uh, welp, uh, um, uh, yeah, I, uh, um, uh wood, um, uh, hit that....

 

just what his finger needs....

 

Edit: I can never unsee this... dayum...

 

New Poll

Straight up, serious poll... pick one

 

Ahh, drilled holes through the box and through the bed of my truck (bottum side). Bolted that beast up with nuts inside the box

 

Bought em off @HoboDave

At the pool now but when I'm back at my truck I'll see if there is a brand name. They're not Matrax.

 

He already hooked me up! Thanks
Enjoy the pool, hope rock therapy was enjoyable!

 

Tis was. Got the target endangered species I was searching for too. Got one more day. Taking the long way home.

 

Wtf is this choose one bullshit?!

 

I'm interested in learning your reasoning for your pick.

Let's discuss.
I'll start.

Military service sidearms are kind of a weapon of last resort.
It's either a backup or it's what they issue you when your job doesn't allow you to carry something more, um... effective.
Maybe you're assigned to a crew served weapon or you're in a support job of some kind where you conceivably might have to defend yourself.
The number of enemy personnel dispatched with service pistols is, to say the least, derisory.

Colt 1911A1

Let's leave aside the low magazine capacity and non-NATO interoperability.
Which guaranteed it would be replaced at some point.
The wonder is that it took so long.
Which goes to show that service pistols are not exactly high priority items

Anyway, let's judge it on its own terms, in its own time.
Do you like SA, hammer fired handguns?


Beretta M9

Passed with flying colors all the tests that could be thrown at it.
DA/SA, hammer fired.
Yeah or nay?


SIG M17/18

Was not subjected to the same second stage tests to destruction that the Beretta endured.
The adoption of this handgun was, to say the least, irregular.
I wonder why...
Striker fired, therefore a simplified manual of arms.
Like it?