Fitting 35’s with minimal trimming NOW ADDING LONG TRAVEL AND 934 CV’s

Yeah I should have remembered you were a 3rd gen, since I'm pretty sure you came by my house and bought my old Archive stuff off me for a buddy of yours. I could see the 934s being tight since the inner radius is massive. I have em too, and they're already tight with the frame. That being said, the strength and plunge is a must. I get ya, I've been tempted to give BasikBiker some business as well. Just don't have the money yet haha.

 

Yea I did stop by. Good memory. Yeah it’s definitely some good change to drop but the results

 

@AY_ARONTRD I never installed my adapter and kit stuff to remote mount the oil filter on the 3rd gen 3.5 to make more clearance. so, if thats something your interested in. let me know and we can work something out

 

You lose a little turn radius with a big brake kit and a lot of folks running tundra racks are running big brake kits and probably never notice.

 

i notice the loss of turning radius with the Tundra rack in parking lots more than anywhere else but nothing serious. i was concerned about tight trails in the trees but hasnt been an issue so far.

 

So I did not cut off my steer stops when I installed the LT kit, was viewing the basik biker thread right now and I see the new steering radius doesn’t come in contact with the steer stops, so I’m wondering if with the mixture of the LT kit and the tundra rack if it will stop somewhere around where the stop steer meets… hmm.

 

It can work. Harry and I talked about it in the past, just a lot of fuckery relocating things. No one wants to go through that headache so I opted out of it.

 

@Ricardo13x helped me come up with a solution. Put spacers to keep rack from making contact with the 934’s. Used to make some awful noises like elks bugling during mating season but all gone now.

 

I wonder if the spacer that the Magnuson requires would give enough room for the slide rack.

 

The tundra rack and 934s will work together, but you have a tiny, tiny margin to fit it. Also, the fab works sucks. Also, you lose some turning radius. Also, it's absolutely worth it (IMO).

 

Damn that’s a tight fit haha

 

Local guy with a GX couldn't get the drop in aluminum cam bushings/sleeves to work with a Tundra rack and 934's. I think he had to weld in new steel barrels into the crossmember.

IIRC those drop in aluminum bushings/barrels allow for more clearance and easier install (except for in the case of running 934's) but increase bump steer due to geometry changes and decrease clearance in other areas.

 

3RD GEN? YEAH, the instructions has you replace them with the provided flex lines.

 

finalizing the core support to JD inner fenders.
Glad the holidays are over to start getting back to normal schedule and get this out there.
this is just a confusing picture of parts on top of parts lol. more to come

 

Yes, 3rd gen.

Thank you!

 

Is that a different inner fender than the original jd? In a picture you posted a couple weeks back it look different and maybe smaller?

 

Has anyone installed the JD SUA kit on a 2wd and had drive shaft issues? It looks like I need to shorten the drive shaft .5”.

Im seriously considering moving the rear spring perch to the furthest back location to compensate. Anyone foresee any negatives?

 

As far as I know every SUA install from any company requires the 2WD to add a slip yoke and shorten the driveshaft. What you need is the flange to flange measurement at full stuff and full droop and give those numbers to the driveline shop

 

I'd agree, I run both and never really noticed losing much turning radius after install.

I had no complaints with mine, thought the boot did come loose, but that was no biggie. Hopefully mine will find a good home!

 

There are two versions yes. One core to fit up to JD inner and another which is a very minimal amount of inner fender