1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Government rating for gas mileage.

Discussion in '2nd Gen. Tacomas (2005-2015)' started by jcayce, Apr 22, 2011.

  1. Apr 22, 2011 at 4:25 PM
    #1
    jcayce

    jcayce [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2009
    Member:
    #18475
    Messages:
    817
    Gender:
    Male
    Texas
    Vehicle:
    17 DCSBTRDOR4X4
    Is this true?

    http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/bestworstEPAtrucks.htm

    How can the Tacoma be the 'least' fuel efficient small truck?

    I wonder if that would have swayed my opinion two years ago? Wife and I are looking at getting rid of our Jeep Grand Cherokee (happily returning 18.1 mpg) for an Audi TDI A3 (40 mpg) and I came across the above website listing.
     
  2. Apr 22, 2011 at 4:36 PM
    #2
    blackhawke88

    blackhawke88 wo ai ni bao bei ^_^

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Member:
    #12478
    Messages:
    16,639
    Gender:
    Male
    SGV, CA
    Vehicle:
    07 TRD Offroad
    Ranger Curb weight is 3120 lbs, Tacoma is 4190 lbs for the one quoted for least mpg
     
  3. Apr 22, 2011 at 5:32 PM
    #3
    Bloodhound

    Bloodhound Banned from the Pics Thread

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Member:
    #48442
    Messages:
    735
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Greg
    East Moline, IL
    Vehicle:
    '10 TRD O/R DBL-CAB
    Floor-mats, Running Boards, Shorty Antenna, AFE Pro Dry Air Filter, AVS In-Channel VentVisors, Beer cans in the bed

    Something seems amiss on their site... Colorado's and Canyon's, according to friends, are averaging around 15 overall. Another friend who replaced a 2007 Tacoma double-cab auto with a 2009 access cab manual (both V6's) is reporting the manual getting less MPG and the tachometer showing approximately 800 RPM higher at 60 mph cruising.
     
  4. Apr 22, 2011 at 5:35 PM
    #4
    SlurpeeBlueMetallic

    SlurpeeBlueMetallic FFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU...

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2009
    Member:
    #18825
    Messages:
    1,656
    Gender:
    Male
    Keep in mind they're talking about a 4x4 with 6-spd manual... taller gears than the auto. They might be an mpg off in each category but I've seen lots of folks reporting 14/15 city and 17/18 highway in that particular setup.
     
  5. Apr 22, 2011 at 5:43 PM
    #5
    MountainEarth

    MountainEarth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Member:
    #30519
    Messages:
    2,481
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Bryan
    CO
    Vehicle:
    2010 TRD OR Access
    Leer 100XR Shell, BedRug mat - comfy sleeping, GT Covers microfiber seat covers, BFG All Terrains 265/70r16, Dashmat, Antennax 13" shorty antenna, Weathertech liners, Ultra Gauge, Avid Light Bar, PIAA 520 ATPs, one old dog
    Yeah unfortunately the manuals do bad on the two ends of the spectrum. If you deal with a lot of stop & go, you burn a lot of gas. If you drive a lot of Interstate above 65 you burn a lot of gas. Where the manual does well is when most of your driving is mostly open rural (limited stop & go) and especially between 30-60. That seems to be the sweet spot for the 6-speed where people can do 20-22mpg mixed .. and maybe even more if they hypermile.
     
  6. Apr 23, 2011 at 4:24 AM
    #6
    buddywh1

    buddywh1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2010
    Member:
    #35825
    Messages:
    1,449
    Gender:
    Male
    Philly PA
    Vehicle:
    07 DC SR5 4x4
    Sounds a tad flaky to me too... IIRC the Tacoma was rated best for MPG Consumer Reports in mid-size pickup group.
     
  7. Apr 23, 2011 at 4:30 AM
    #7
    2008taco

    2008taco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Member:
    #52323
    Messages:
    2,825
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    chris
    san diego
    My friend's 4cyl, 5speed ranger was getting 15. Government ratings are usually screwed up somewhere. I'd look into a ranger site and see what real owners are sayin.
     
  8. Apr 23, 2011 at 7:43 AM
    #8
    Highland Logan

    Highland Logan UBIQUE

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Member:
    #54752
    Messages:
    2,796
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Frank
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2011 Black AC TRD Off Road w/ factory tow pkg
    Icon Stage 2 w/ overload left in, SPC LR UCA, 265/75 16 BFG KO2, front and rear Weathertech floor liners, OEM (Extang) solid fold tonneau, OEM bed mat, OEM front skid plate, OEM billet oil cap, "TOYOYA" tailgate decal
    Remember that the Ranger is a compact, not a mid-size. I had a '99 B3000 (a Ranger in disguise) manual and my tank of 62L could get me 500 km hwy, or 400 km city.

    Frank
     
  9. Apr 23, 2011 at 8:10 AM
    #9
    dexterdog

    dexterdog My pee parts itch

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Member:
    #19571
    Messages:
    4,917
    Gender:
    Male
    Oly WA
    Vehicle:
    2012 F150
    I average around 16 mpg with 4x4 double cab AT so I don't find it that far off. I do very little freeway driving of course.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top