1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Tacoma vs Tundra MPG (real world)

Discussion in '2nd Gen. Tacomas (2005-2015)' started by vtdog, Jul 27, 2011.

  1. Jul 27, 2011 at 2:57 PM
    #1
    vtdog

    vtdog [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Member:
    #15767
    Messages:
    630
    Gender:
    Male
    NH
    I was on a recent trip where we drove my Tacoma and a Tundra round trip from NH to Labrador City, NL. The total distance driven was about 2000 mi round trip and included highway, two lane roads and about 600 miles of hard pack dirt road in 4wd. Both trucks are similarly equipped (A/T, air, bed cover) and had about the same load in each.

    Since we pooled gas for dividing between all travelling I got a chance to compare the two. Based on total gas costs, the cost for my Tacoma was 18% lower than the Tundra. This was signifigant as gas ranged from a low of $ 5/gallon to over $ 6/gallon in Canada.
     
  2. Jul 27, 2011 at 3:03 PM
    #2
    Fightnfire

    Fightnfire Recklessly tired

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2011
    Member:
    #58178
    Messages:
    6,008
    Gender:
    Male
    Marysville, WA
    Vehicle:
    2021 GMC Sierra 1500 AT4 (Prev 09 Access Cab V6 4X4)
    Starting over with a new GMC AT4 Satin Steel Metallic Softopper, Bilstein 5100's @ 1.75 in the front, TSB Rear, 17x8.5 Lvl 8 Guardians, 265/70-17 Falken Wildpeak AT3W, Scooped, Anytime fog mod, Osram Nightbreakers, LED Interior lights, Debadged, Painted valance, Removed rear head rests, De-flapped, Hidden Hitch installed, Weather Techs, Flyzeye'd A/W/A, Cover Kings.
    Do you know what the actual MPG was? 18% is significant .. I would have expected closer to 10-15.

    If we assume 20 for the Tacoma, then 18% less is 16.4 for the Tundra. 18 for the Tacoma and the Tundra turns into 14.76.
     
  3. Jul 27, 2011 at 3:18 PM
    #3
    jberry813

    jberry813 Professional Fluffer Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Member:
    #49636
    Messages:
    28,471
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jason
    Lake Tahoe
    Vehicle:
    2012 DCSB Sport
    ...too much shit to list.
    What year Tundra?
    Which package Tundra (regular, accces, double, crew)?
    Which motor in the Tundra?
    Which package Tacoma (regular, accces, double)?
    Which motor in your Tacoma?

    To me it seems like you're comparing apples to oranges.

    EDIT: and what year Tacoma? I'm assuming second gen since you posted in 2nd gen section, but then again, everything gets posted in the 2nd gen seciton.
     
  4. Jul 27, 2011 at 5:56 PM
    #4
    vtdog

    vtdog [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Member:
    #15767
    Messages:
    630
    Gender:
    Male
    NH
    I have an 11 DC offroad short bed Tacoma with about 5k miles. My buddy has an '09 Tundra with a v8 and about 35k miles. I don't know the exact model, but it seems to have an upgraded comfort package. Both are automatics. The MPG in my Tacoma was just under 21 (which includes the conversion from kilos/liter to mpg) which means the Tundra was just over 17.

    I don't want to get into a rock fight over this, but just thought it would be an interesting comparison based on the exact same travel for the two vehicles.
     
  5. Jul 27, 2011 at 6:03 PM
    #5
    bowzerdoo77

    bowzerdoo77 U.S.M.C.

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Member:
    #658
    Messages:
    951
    Gender:
    Male
    North Ogden Utah
    Vehicle:
    1997 REG CAB 4x4
    None
    yea I have had both, i have lifted both and they both get crapy mielage my tacoma gets about 15-16 now and my tundra got from 10 -12 both bad ass trucks and one day if i need 400 hp ill get another tundra...
     
  6. Jul 27, 2011 at 6:19 PM
    #6
    Azjohn

    Azjohn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2010
    Member:
    #33269
    Messages:
    55
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    John
    arizona/SLO Ca/SF Ca.
    Vehicle:
    2010 trd sport
    debadged
    Check out Fuelly .com
     
  7. Jul 28, 2011 at 6:12 AM
    #7
    Simon's Mom

    Simon's Mom Wag More Bark Less

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    Member:
    #1297
    Messages:
    10,197
    Gender:
    Female
    First Name:
    Judy or Jude :)
    NEK Island Pond VT
    Vehicle:
    24 Tundra Trd Sport former 13 TRD OR
    Stock for now
    Was the tundra the 4.7 or bigger V8?
    My 1GEN tundra 4.7 V8 AC got pretty comparable mpgs to my DC 4x4 Taco.
    Just curious if that mileage for the tundra was with the bigger V8 engine.
     
  8. Jul 28, 2011 at 6:18 AM
    #8
    The_Hodge

    The_Hodge Volunteer Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Member:
    #1432
    Messages:
    31,633
    Gender:
    Male
    SC
    Vehicle:
    15 Lariat Sport 5.0L
    Seeing the third gen section forced me to get a Ford...
    i wouldnt mind the new 4.6 to be an option in these. i'm just surprised you can get the tundra w/ the same 4.0 we have.
     
  9. Jul 28, 2011 at 6:25 AM
    #9
    Pugga

    Pugga Pasti-Dip Free 1983 - 2015... It was a good run

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    Member:
    #39131
    Messages:
    38,458
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mike
    Massachusetts
    Vehicle:
    '19 Ford F-250 6.7 SCrew
    F-250 Land Yacht Mod
    It is apples and oranges, full size vs mid size, V6 vs V8. The OP is just pointing out a real world comparision he did from a neutral perspective.
     
    Hoff likes this.
  10. Jul 28, 2011 at 6:31 AM
    #10
    SACTOWN

    SACTOWN ???????????????????????

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Member:
    #18143
    Messages:
    23,385
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Greg
    Vehicle:
    '18 ZR2, 04 Rubicon, &19 lx570
    A buddies 4x4 tundra 5.7 gets about 15.

    My 4.0 4x4 taco gets any where from 16-24 depending on how I drive
     
  11. Jul 28, 2011 at 6:35 AM
    #11
    FireGuy

    FireGuy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    Member:
    #60211
    Messages:
    14
    Gender:
    Male
    Florida
    Vehicle:
    06 Tacoma TRD DCSB
    I'm curious which V8 model his buddy has. That makes a big difference because the 5.7 comes with a whole different tranny. (6spd auto vs 5spd auto in the other V8)

    I still have my Tundra and recently bought a Taco. I really want to lift the Tacoma and add 33s but I don't want to deal with crappy gas mileage.
     
  12. Jul 28, 2011 at 11:42 AM
    #12
    Simon's Mom

    Simon's Mom Wag More Bark Less

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    Member:
    #1297
    Messages:
    10,197
    Gender:
    Female
    First Name:
    Judy or Jude :)
    NEK Island Pond VT
    Vehicle:
    24 Tundra Trd Sport former 13 TRD OR
    Stock for now
    yes the new 4.6 is an attractive option for sure.
    I know a friend who had a tundra w/ a 4.0 right before it was dropped in 2005. It also was the only way you could get a manual trans.
    Got me thinking of that 4.6 now......
     
  13. Jul 28, 2011 at 11:44 AM
    #13
    The_Hodge

    The_Hodge Volunteer Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Member:
    #1432
    Messages:
    31,633
    Gender:
    Male
    SC
    Vehicle:
    15 Lariat Sport 5.0L
    Seeing the third gen section forced me to get a Ford...
    my mom bought a double cab (really an extended cab) w/ the 4.0 in it. it weighs 800# more than my taco does and toyota claims like 1mpg less than the taco. i wouldnt have bought it. i think the 4.6 had 30 more hp and 1-3 mpgs better i think.
     
  14. Jul 28, 2011 at 11:50 AM
    #14
    Simon's Mom

    Simon's Mom Wag More Bark Less

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    Member:
    #1297
    Messages:
    10,197
    Gender:
    Female
    First Name:
    Judy or Jude :)
    NEK Island Pond VT
    Vehicle:
    24 Tundra Trd Sport former 13 TRD OR
    Stock for now
    wow, I didn't know it came back available on the newer Gens.
    Definitely have heard good on the 4.6, I would not mind having that setup.
    My 2004 Tundra w/ the 4.7 did pretty good mpg for a small V8 but I like the tacoma's ergos so much better. :)
    Is your Mom's 4WD?
     
  15. Jul 28, 2011 at 11:53 AM
    #15
    The_Hodge

    The_Hodge Volunteer Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Member:
    #1432
    Messages:
    31,633
    Gender:
    Male
    SC
    Vehicle:
    15 Lariat Sport 5.0L
    Seeing the third gen section forced me to get a Ford...
    nope, 2wd. pretty basic.
     
  16. Jul 28, 2011 at 11:58 AM
    #16
    TnRedNeck721

    TnRedNeck721 Nick Namer

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2011
    Member:
    #52731
    Messages:
    23,846
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Zach
    TN
    Vehicle:
    07 TRD off road 4WD
    No mud flaps, plasti dipped emblems, and rear bumper, Weather tech digital fit, Bed mat from tractor supply. Pioneer 4400BH head unit. B.A.M.F bed rail tie downs. AVS vent visors.
    yeah i want to know what engine the tundra has. dad has a 1st gen 4.7 V8 extended cab 4wd.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top