1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Spongy Brakes 2009 Taco.

Discussion in '2nd Gen. Tacomas (2005-2015)' started by tacobird, Dec 24, 2008.

  1. Feb 19, 2009 at 8:34 AM
    #21
    thinkingman

    thinkingman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Member:
    #5971
    Messages:
    1,105
    redmond WA
    Vehicle:
    2006 dbl cab 4wd 6sp
    Foglights are for fog, not oncoming traffic!
    I agree with (almost) everything mentioned above.
    The improvement these posters mention re SS lines has everything to do with brakes being bled in the process of installing the lines, not the fact that they are a different material.
     
  2. Feb 19, 2009 at 8:40 AM
    #22
    RedruM29

    RedruM29 Blinking Car Mod...

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Member:
    #4594
    Messages:
    607
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Kyle
    Nor☆Cal
    Vehicle:
    08 trd sport 4x4
    Just enough, and never enough
    ^ what are you even saying?
     
  3. Feb 19, 2009 at 8:59 AM
    #23
    thinkingman

    thinkingman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Member:
    #5971
    Messages:
    1,105
    redmond WA
    Vehicle:
    2006 dbl cab 4wd 6sp
    Foglights are for fog, not oncoming traffic!
    Me?
    What don't you understand?
    In order to install SS or braided lines, you have to bleed the brakes.
    Bleeding the brakes removes the spongy feel and excessive travel.
    Then someone gets in the truck and says 'these new brakelines are much better than the factory lines...everybody should buy these' when they would have gotten the same result by just bleeding the factory lines.

    Or, are you questioning why I agree that these trucks would see minimal improvement from rear discs?
     
  4. Feb 19, 2009 at 9:02 AM
    #24
    whitebread

    whitebread Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Member:
    #12489
    Messages:
    1,023
    Gender:
    Male
    Raleigh, NC
    Vehicle:
    2019 OR 4x4 6MT
    I believe the theory with stainless lines are that they deflect less under pressure than rubber lines, and in turn, will have less wasted energy...more of the energy created by depressing the master cylinder will be transferred to piston movement. In theory this will give you 'better brake feel.'

    But, at least all of the stainless lines i have seen are simply a loose stainless braid over rubber lines. :rolleyes:

    Edit: I don't buy into the hype that SS lines would be even noticeable to a street car/truck. I agree with bleeding the old fluid will make more of a change...it breaks down with over time because of the high temperatures created by brakes.
     
  5. Feb 19, 2009 at 9:17 AM
    #25
    Janster

    Janster Old & Forgetful

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Member:
    #1138
    Messages:
    14,338
    Gender:
    Female
    First Name:
    Jandy
    Lancaster, PA
    Vehicle:
    2016 GMC Canyon SLT w/ LineX and....
    On a side note to that....
    If you have air in the lines, pumping the brakes is a bad idea because you're breaking up the bubbles into tiny little bubbles that are harder to see when you bleed the brakes.
     
  6. Feb 19, 2009 at 9:22 AM
    #26
    Janster

    Janster Old & Forgetful

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Member:
    #1138
    Messages:
    14,338
    Gender:
    Female
    First Name:
    Jandy
    Lancaster, PA
    Vehicle:
    2016 GMC Canyon SLT w/ LineX and....
    The improvement of SS brake lines has nothing to do with bleeding the brakes.

    Rubber lines can & will expand under pressure. When they expand, you lose pressure (spongy feel, pedal goes does farther).

    SS brake lines do not expand under pressure thuse resulting in more pressure to the brakes with less effort at the pedal.
     
  7. Feb 19, 2009 at 10:33 AM
    #27
    Bill Brasky

    Bill Brasky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Member:
    #12267
    Messages:
    205
    Gender:
    Male
    East of the Mississippi, South of the Ohio
    Vehicle:
    stump jumper
    modified for light trail use
    Um, no.


    This is correct.
     
  8. Feb 19, 2009 at 10:40 AM
    #28
    whitebread

    whitebread Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Member:
    #12489
    Messages:
    1,023
    Gender:
    Male
    Raleigh, NC
    Vehicle:
    2019 OR 4x4 6MT
    They don't lose pressure, some of the pedal travel will simply go into "expanding" the lines. Unless you have a leak, pushing the pedal will always increase the pressure in the braking system.


    SS will expand as well, just at a different rate.
     
  9. Feb 19, 2009 at 10:44 AM
    #29
    BONES

    BONES Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2008
    Member:
    #7320
    Messages:
    75
    SoCal
    Vehicle:
    06 PreRunner SR5 w/TRD Offroad pkg
    AFE 'Pro-Dry S' OE air filter, Westin bull-nose guard & side steps, TSB leaf pack, TSB intake-hose, rubber bed mat, Bridgestone Dueler A/T Revos, Stubbie 21" antenna, Goodridge G-Stop s/s brake lines
    Honestly, I never gave that a thought, other than I didn't feel I had air in my lines. Still glad I made the switch, though. In any case, when I decide to lift my ride (3" or so), I won't have to extend my lines. Oh, and the stronger line comes in handy when changing to larger tires.
     
  10. Feb 19, 2009 at 10:44 AM
    #30
    Bill Brasky

    Bill Brasky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Member:
    #12267
    Messages:
    205
    Gender:
    Male
    East of the Mississippi, South of the Ohio
    Vehicle:
    stump jumper
    modified for light trail use
    There's a guy who works for Goodridge who posts on TN...he'll tell you exactly what Jan said.
     
  11. Feb 19, 2009 at 10:55 AM
    #31
    CRFan1

    CRFan1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2009
    Member:
    #12357
    Messages:
    180
    Gender:
    Male
    Northwest Indiana
    Vehicle:
    Tacoma Pre-Runner
    DNX5120, Audsion AMp, Hertz Speakers
    This is absolutely a correct statement......:thumbsup:
     
  12. Feb 19, 2009 at 11:03 AM
    #32
    whitebread

    whitebread Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Member:
    #12489
    Messages:
    1,023
    Gender:
    Male
    Raleigh, NC
    Vehicle:
    2019 OR 4x4 6MT
    The expansion in the lines will be instantaneous. The system isn't going to pressurize and then have the rubber lines expand (causing a drop in pressure)...they are going to expand when the system is pressurizing. For a given pressure, the rubber will have a certain amount of deflection. They behave like a thin walled pressure vessel.
     
  13. Feb 19, 2009 at 11:46 AM
    #33
    Bill Brasky

    Bill Brasky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Member:
    #12267
    Messages:
    205
    Gender:
    Male
    East of the Mississippi, South of the Ohio
    Vehicle:
    stump jumper
    modified for light trail use
    Right. But, the amount of that deflection is less with a SS line, therefore less pressure is wasted on the deflection. Therefore, you don't have to stomp the brakes to compensate for (instantanious) pressure loss due to rubber lines...less effort to do the same job b/c less energy is being wasted.

    In other words, the brakes are still getting the amount of pressure they need to operate with rubber lines, you just don't have to waste as much leg to get it to stop in the same distance with SS lines...b/c there is less pressure drop in the line, instantanious or otherwise.
     
  14. Feb 19, 2009 at 11:49 AM
    #34
    whitebread

    whitebread Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Member:
    #12489
    Messages:
    1,023
    Gender:
    Male
    Raleigh, NC
    Vehicle:
    2019 OR 4x4 6MT
    Bill, I 100% agree in the principle that stainless steel lines will have more pressure than rubber lines given specific pedal travel. What I was disputing is that rubber lines technically don't "lose pressure."
     
  15. Feb 19, 2009 at 11:51 AM
    #35
    tacoholic

    tacoholic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Member:
    #12480
    Messages:
    4,072
    Gender:
    Male
    East Bay, CA
    I noticed this first thing (along with hitting my head on the headliner getting in/out) when I tested out a 2009 TRD Sport DC SB 4x4 and a 2009 TRD Off Road 4x2. I hoped it would go away soon but I wasn't sure and didn't know if anyone elsewas ahving this problem. Sounds good to let it just wear in and stiffen up or get teh brake lines bled...upgraded lines can be added later. ;)
     
  16. Feb 19, 2009 at 11:58 AM
    #36
    CRFan1

    CRFan1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2009
    Member:
    #12357
    Messages:
    180
    Gender:
    Male
    Northwest Indiana
    Vehicle:
    Tacoma Pre-Runner
    DNX5120, Audsion AMp, Hertz Speakers
    Nope, rubber lines don't lose pressure (you are correct) but they do cause additional pedal travel due to increased expansion of the material. I have used SS lines (actually the inner cores are teflon) on my bikes for years and they simply produce an immediate, solid feel and eliminate the sponginess. If you were to change the lines on a tacoma with SS ones there would be an improvement in "Feel", not braking performance, etc. :)
     
  17. Feb 19, 2009 at 12:05 PM
    #37
    Bill Brasky

    Bill Brasky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Member:
    #12267
    Messages:
    205
    Gender:
    Male
    East of the Mississippi, South of the Ohio
    Vehicle:
    stump jumper
    modified for light trail use
    I see. And I agree.

    Absorb would be a better word. The same amount of pressure is reaching the brakes regardless of brake line material, it's the amount of force required to reach that level of pressure at the end of the line that varies. While the rubber line might not "lose" pressure, more pressure is required to operate the brakes and balloon the rubber lines than is required with a stronger line that won't steal/rob/absorb any pressure (or as much I should say). So, with SS lines, it takes less pedal to get the same end of the line line pressure b/c you don't have to compensate for stretching the lines.

    Does that make any more sense?
     
  18. Feb 19, 2009 at 12:06 PM
    #38
    Bill Brasky

    Bill Brasky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Member:
    #12267
    Messages:
    205
    Gender:
    Male
    East of the Mississippi, South of the Ohio
    Vehicle:
    stump jumper
    modified for light trail use
    Well put.

    I can appreciate eloquence when I see it.
     
  19. Feb 19, 2009 at 12:29 PM
    #39
    CRFan1

    CRFan1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2009
    Member:
    #12357
    Messages:
    180
    Gender:
    Male
    Northwest Indiana
    Vehicle:
    Tacoma Pre-Runner
    DNX5120, Audsion AMp, Hertz Speakers
    lol!!:d
     
  20. Feb 19, 2009 at 6:55 PM
    #40
    Janster

    Janster Old & Forgetful

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Member:
    #1138
    Messages:
    14,338
    Gender:
    Female
    First Name:
    Jandy
    Lancaster, PA
    Vehicle:
    2016 GMC Canyon SLT w/ LineX and....
    You're not loosing pressure.

    The rubber can't handle the pressure - thus - they expand. Technically causing the rubber lines to be slightly larger in diameter which uses up more volume of fluid.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top