better looking! hankook dynapro ATM or Rugged trail t/a ?

For those who have seen both in 265-75-16!
Only on picture I can't tell witch will have a better look!

 

Hankooks for sure...

 

^
I don't even think the looks of the rugged fails, comes close to the Hankooks

 

Checkout the cooper discoverer at3. I just put them one new wheels and they look great.

 

Some Hankook photos (265/75-16)

 

thanks

 

I finaly buy Hankook's

 

I don't even think the looks of the rugged fails.

 

the new rugged terrains are nice, I put them on my dad's 02 and he loves them

 

Hankook Dynapro ATm's for sure. Had them for 10,000 miles and no regrets.

 

I like the thread pattern, do they make alot of noise?

 

It's hard to tell, but, I can say they make a little bit noise! but not something too mutch!

 

the Kooks, no doubt. The Fails are lame.

 

No drawbacks with the DynaPro ATm - quiet and smooth on the highway.

 

Somewhat suprising to me is the fact my Hankook ATm's pick up and throw WAY more rocks than my Hankook MT's did .

 

kooks for sure

 

That's somewhat explanable: the MTs have greater space between tread lugs, so rocks don't get caught. Haven't driven much on my ATms. I'm keeping my mudflaps on, though I had to trim away two domed sections on each flap to avoid rubbing. I think my wheels may be contributing to this - the Countersteers are 0 offset, so the tires stick out farther than stock OR wheels.

 

Kook At's are sick 30k later 2 rotaions and 1 balance and still wearing good. By far the best tires I've had

 

Hankooks all the way brochacho

 

Typical with all terrains. I think BFG A/Ts are the worst at this. If you check out your tread blocks you'll see little ridges in the sides of them. Hankook calls them stone ejectors. I think they work pretty good as my Kooks seem to have shed all the debris at a lower speed than the BFGs I've owned did. I remember hearing rocks whizzing past my open slider at 30-40 mph on my reg cab.