1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Elevation and MPG

Discussion in '2nd Gen. Tacomas (2005-2015)' started by NetMonkey, May 4, 2012.

  1. Jun 15, 2012 at 6:30 PM
    #21
    monkeyface

    monkeyface Douchebag, or just douche if we're friends

    Joined:
    May 13, 2012
    Member:
    #78740
    Messages:
    3,132
    Gender:
    Male
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    '90,'97,'12,'05 Tundra 4.7,'07 T4R 4.7,'08 T4R 4.7
    Well, I just made 20.4 mpg on 91 oct running from Littleton, CO down south on I-25 to 24 west then up to Tarryall and Jefferson, then back to Littleton on 285S to 470S. Ran it in 4WD for about 5-10 miles. That's with the Leer 180 topper and a Black Lab, maybe 300 extra pounds right there. Not bad at all. I'm pleased.
     
  2. Jun 15, 2012 at 6:45 PM
    #22
    worthywads

    worthywads Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Member:
    #58841
    Messages:
    5,345
    Gender:
    Male
    Peoples Republic of Boulder
    Vehicle:
    05 5-lug access I4 Stick, 70 Challenger Vert
    I have a stick, it drops gears when I say.

    Better mpg at higher altitude is a fact. You discount lower air density and wind resistance as "tiny" but it's more like 20% less which is a lot. Driving 72 mph at 6000 ft has the same aerodynamic drag as driving 60 mph at sea level. Overcoming aerodynamic drag is what requires the most energy.

    Planes fly at high altitude for a reason.

    Ding ding ding ding..... my 1000th post.
     
  3. Jun 15, 2012 at 7:43 PM
    #23
    Thighmaster

    Thighmaster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2012
    Member:
    #74493
    Messages:
    124
    Gender:
    Male
    Ward, Colorado
    Vehicle:
    2012 Red TRD Off-Road
    June 2016 OME Dakars + 3" ToyTec Boss Lift
    There is not less oxygen in the mountains, there is less air pressure, but the amount of O2 is proportionately the same as at sea level.
     
  4. Jun 15, 2012 at 8:30 PM
    #24
    memario1214

    memario1214 Hotshot Offroad Moderator Vendor

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2009
    Member:
    #23628
    Messages:
    20,191
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Colton
    Missoula, MT
    Vehicle:
    SOLD - 05 Dub Cab TRD Sport 4x4, CURRENT - '21 Tundra MGM Limited
    To maintain a certain speed up a hill you would have to drop to a particular gear anyway... So that argument is invalid.

    Outside of that, upon doing some homework I have discovered that you are in fact correct. I misspoke and was under the impression that what I had stated is correct. I concede this battle now knowing that you are correct.

    Thank you, but I knew that already
     
  5. Jun 15, 2012 at 8:40 PM
    #25
    Gincoma

    Gincoma Special Edition Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2010
    Member:
    #46179
    Messages:
    2,117
    Gender:
    Male
    Salt Lake City UT
    Vehicle:
    RIPieces 2005 Tacoma, adios 2011 :'(
    Factory Monster Truck Package with reverse gear.
    I sleep at 5650 ft ...I know for a fact I'm more powerful at sea level when i travel to California I notice more boost so I would imagine I use more fuel but really haven't noticed hopefully someone here has hard facts
     
  6. Jun 15, 2012 at 8:41 PM
    #26
    Utard

    Utard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2011
    Member:
    #66532
    Messages:
    3,121
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mark
    Tidewater, OR
    Vehicle:
    2019 Tacoma SR5
    Readin is for fools in schools.
     
  7. Jun 15, 2012 at 8:41 PM
    #27
    rab89

    rab89 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2009
    Member:
    #12578
    Messages:
    5,490
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ross
    Kelowna b.c canada
    Vehicle:
    2017 DCLB TRD Sport
    I'm confused now haha what did we decide?

    I also didn't know you guys could get 85 octane... our lowest is 87, then we have 89 and 91, I have been thinking about going to 89 or 91 to get rid of the ethanol, I'll have to see how much is in each one...
     
  8. Jun 15, 2012 at 8:43 PM
    #28
    memario1214

    memario1214 Hotshot Offroad Moderator Vendor

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2009
    Member:
    #23628
    Messages:
    20,191
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Colton
    Missoula, MT
    Vehicle:
    SOLD - 05 Dub Cab TRD Sport 4x4, CURRENT - '21 Tundra MGM Limited
    Yeah, that was my thing too. My truck rips at low elevations which is why I could only imagine that my mileage was better due to more power. Upon looking at a lot about how airplanes work, I have found myself incorrect though. My shitty mileage comes mainly from the large tires and the fact that I have to go up and down mountain passes. I get horrid mileage on passes, which are on either side of this town.
     
  9. Jun 15, 2012 at 8:55 PM
    #29
    Holyfather

    Holyfather Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Member:
    #69182
    Messages:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Arizona
    Vehicle:
    2011 TX Pro TRD
    Front Bilstein 5100s @ 1.75"
    Its most likely your lift/ tires and driving habits. I live at 7000 feet elevation and track my mileage on firmly and I'm averaging 19 MPG with basicly a stock truck
     
  10. Jun 15, 2012 at 9:13 PM
    #30
    memario1214

    memario1214 Hotshot Offroad Moderator Vendor

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2009
    Member:
    #23628
    Messages:
    20,191
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Colton
    Missoula, MT
    Vehicle:
    SOLD - 05 Dub Cab TRD Sport 4x4, CURRENT - '21 Tundra MGM Limited
    This isn't a thread about my mileage in my truck. Before my lift/tires I got around 18 as well. I will not deny the fact that they play a large part in my mileage...
     
  11. Jun 15, 2012 at 9:16 PM
    #31
    worthywads

    worthywads Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Member:
    #58841
    Messages:
    5,345
    Gender:
    Male
    Peoples Republic of Boulder
    Vehicle:
    05 5-lug access I4 Stick, 70 Challenger Vert
    Proportionately isn't the concern, relative to sea level there is less oxygen in the mountains, which matters.

    Tell someone at the peak of Mt. Everest that there isn't less oxygen there.
     
  12. Jun 16, 2012 at 9:55 AM
    #32
    Thighmaster

    Thighmaster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2012
    Member:
    #74493
    Messages:
    124
    Gender:
    Male
    Ward, Colorado
    Vehicle:
    2012 Red TRD Off-Road
    June 2016 OME Dakars + 3" ToyTec Boss Lift
    Actually, having been to Mt. Everest I had no trouble understanding I was short of breath because of less partial pressure, not less oxygen. I understand it affects the vehicle, but I enjoy the science of it all and wanted to bring it up. When I moved from sea level to 9,000' in 1993 I enjoyed increasing the timing on my old VW for this very reason... of decreased air pressure.
     
  13. Jun 16, 2012 at 10:25 AM
    #33
    SummitCo.Skier

    SummitCo.Skier Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Member:
    #68394
    Messages:
    34
    Gender:
    Male
    Keystone, CO
    Vehicle:
    08 Tacoma...3in lift...TRD Off-Road
    Cars get less MPG at higher altitude....PERIOD, no argument........I live between 9-12k feet everyday and my truck/every other car I've ever had does gets at least 3-4mpg less up here compared to the Front Range
     
  14. Jun 16, 2012 at 11:01 AM
    #34
    Dustyroades

    Dustyroades Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2011
    Member:
    #49156
    Messages:
    345
    Gender:
    Male
    London, Ontario
    Vehicle:
    2019 TRD Sport
    Sorry but you can't just say no argument and make your statement true.
     
  15. Jun 16, 2012 at 11:44 AM
    #35
    monkeyface

    monkeyface Douchebag, or just douche if we're friends

    Joined:
    May 13, 2012
    Member:
    #78740
    Messages:
    3,132
    Gender:
    Male
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    '90,'97,'12,'05 Tundra 4.7,'07 T4R 4.7,'08 T4R 4.7
    The density of the atmosphere is the key. You get more molecules per square liter at sea level vs. 10k.
     
  16. Jun 16, 2012 at 1:03 PM
    #36
    SoCo

    SoCo Hateful Respect

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2011
    Member:
    #63751
    Messages:
    144
    Gender:
    Male
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    3rd gen T4R 5spd.
    There's not enough bandwidth for what's happening.
    He's not in the minority. JFGI. You should get slightly better mpg at altitude. Octane levels are lower here for a reason.

    I get 19 mpg mixed city and highway with my V6 manual AC with 265/75/16 tires (duratracs). I drive a mountain pass at least once daily with an elevation change 2500'.
     
  17. Jun 16, 2012 at 2:16 PM
    #37
    Thighmaster

    Thighmaster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2012
    Member:
    #74493
    Messages:
    124
    Gender:
    Male
    Ward, Colorado
    Vehicle:
    2012 Red TRD Off-Road
    June 2016 OME Dakars + 3" ToyTec Boss Lift
    From the Internet:
    "Effects of Air Pressure
    Altitude decreases an engine’s octane requirements because of the change in air pressure. The higher elevations have a lower level of air pressure, which means an engine needs less octane to properly fire due to the lower ambient pressure. In certain states, such as Colorado where the altitude is generally above 5,000 feet in the mountain regions, 85 octane gasoline is sold, while in lower elevations 87 octane is the lowest sold.
    End Result
    When an engine requires lower levels of octane to “fire,” the overall efficiency of the engine is also lowered, which means the engine works harder to achieve the same results. However, less fuel burns, which means the overall fuel-per-mile efficiency is increased because the engine is working at a reduced compression rate. In short, you can get higher miles-per-gallon at higher elevations, but the power of the engine is also somewhat reduced."
     
  18. Jun 16, 2012 at 2:19 PM
    #38
    SummitCo.Skier

    SummitCo.Skier Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Member:
    #68394
    Messages:
    34
    Gender:
    Male
    Keystone, CO
    Vehicle:
    08 Tacoma...3in lift...TRD Off-Road
    UMMM, well I live here and have 2 cars that go back and forth between the 2 elevations and there is ALWAYS a difference.......Seeing how it works in everyday life doesn't LIE

    and at least 1/2 of the people commenting don't even live any where near the elevation I do
     
  19. Jun 16, 2012 at 2:25 PM
    #39
    SummitCo.Skier

    SummitCo.Skier Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Member:
    #68394
    Messages:
    34
    Gender:
    Male
    Keystone, CO
    Vehicle:
    08 Tacoma...3in lift...TRD Off-Road
    soooo.....If this is true, someone please explain to me why I ALWAYS get worse mpg
     
  20. Jun 16, 2012 at 2:45 PM
    #40
    Beers

    Beers Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2012
    Member:
    #79038
    Messages:
    516
    Gender:
    Male
    Colorado
    Vehicle:
    12 TRD OR
    If your engine power is suffering too much from the increased elevation then the car will need to run in a lower gear to generate enough power to get up an incline or hill. The lower gear/higher RPM's will drop your mileage.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top