Transgender woman sues BLM over Taser incident

Just heard about this on the news, next time you go to the desert you just might be the next victim of overzealous BLM rangers...


http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/nov/12/transgender-woman-sues-blm-over-crotch-tasering/

 

Should be interesting to see how this turns out.

 

Ill never understand how people are so stupid that they want their balls chopped off.

 

How about the dipshit cop that's probably going to lose his job because of his personal views?

 

There are a lot of TW members who are trannies. You might want to be a little more sensitive.

 

I agree. The cop was a dipshit too, and he deserves too loose his job.

 

you are not supposed to understand..i dont either, but it is clearly none of my business. i do know they didnt do it out of stupidity.

the cops crossed the line..i would throw a hate crime charge at them.

 

Effing great. I work for the DOI, of which BLM is a part of. Freaking idiot.

 

Assuming you're not one of the ones in the video, I'd say you're all set other than an eventful couple days at the office.

 

This whole idea of hate crimes is absurd. There should be no such!

People should be judged by their actions and not their thoughts.

This cop should be punished. But the idea that he deserves extra time for his thoughts are crazy.

 

X100000000

 

This is why I don't feel bad for collecting rocks on BLM land.

 

I've lived in Tulsa for 15 months, moving to Denver in 11 days and though still DOI, still NOT BLM!

 

What is the relation between that and a hate crime?

 

Careful... if they catch you, you could get tazed! Make sure your friends get it on video so you can sue later

 

The thought behind it.

 

That is NO correlation, sorry. Premeditated murder (murder 1, or 1st degree), means that the killer PLANNED for it. Non premeditated (murder 2-3, 2nd or 3rd) means that it was in the heat of the moment or probably accidental/incidental


As for "hate crimes". Thats just a falacy that politicians cooked up, some time ago.

 

She was responding to this post^^

It's still a different crime because of the thought process behind it, not just the action. In a way, it's the same general concept.

 

This is a very good question. I said before I don't think people should be judged based on their thoughts or motivations, but their actions. I'm going too add that they should be judged on their intentions.

Generally non premeditated murder, or manslaughter is separated into two categories. Intentional and non-intentional.

I would say that intentional manslaughter is the same as premeditated murder. But non-intentional manslaughter is different. For example, if you light a forest on fire, and someone dies. This would be non intentional manslaughter, since your only intention would be lighting the forest on fire.

However if you kill someone in the spur of the moment, this would be the same as premeditated murder, because you intended too kill someone. It should not matter if the reason behind the murder was race, sex, or revenge. What should matter is that the person killed someone, and that they intended to do it.

Just my two cents.