Same-sex marriage

I'm talking about the DESIRE of the HUMAN to be married to the mouse, and the possiility that they feel they have that right. But to keep it simple, why not 2 men and a woman? Why not 3 men and 3 women? Why would you draw the line at 2 men or 2 women? I'm seriously asking because why would the number of people matter at that point?

 

Same SEX Marriage is the op..not two men and a lady or my goat and your dog or your tacoma and my volvo .. unless you want to make up that as a topic ...

 

The point is that you would be changing what the term "marriage" means based on what you THINK it should mean. What's to keep someone else from changing the term to mean what THEY think it should mean?

 

lets be rational two gay people and two straight people are the only thing it could be...its between two people. That can be said for sure

 

You are making my point for me......now you are defining the word in a way that may make someone else feel unequal because they have a different idea of what it should mean. Anyway gents, late here, good to talk to ya'. Sweet dreams!

 

^^^ you win the argument you have with yourself..nobody else is asking this in the courts. its about same sex marriage ?? you can have your dream about 5 people getting married or whatever you feel this topic is about..But it seems to be a non issue

 

Yes, unequivocally, I view homosexual relationships as morally wrong, but am perfectly willing for them to have all the same rights I have. But as I stated, I would like my relationship with my wife to not be categorized in the same definition. Gays won't even give on this one minor thing because they want to brainwash society into believing that heterosexuals and homesexuals are perfectly and completely equal. You strip someone's identity by redefining it and this is the real goal of gays.

 

Because gays fundamentally want no boundaries on sexaul appetite or choice. Certainly Hodge doesn't.

 

Again, hodge is an ammoral Nihilist. He consistently states that established rules of societal behavior do not matter as it relates to inter-human sexual relations. And he is an atheist, although he won't confirm it.

 

After reading all of the posts above this, Ive only come to a conclusion that reinforced my way of thinking:

Gay people should have the right to be together under the law, some of you say that straight and gay is not a matter of choice, then by any means we are exactly the same, because then we have a physical difference, just like women and man have... then if we are slightly different, the unions cant be named the same, and this is not the only reason, a marriage (that's man and woman) has the purpose amongst others to procreate, so a man and man cant procreate, because of lack of uterus and all that stuff, so it cant be the same exact union, thus cant be named marriage.... that's my reasoning, and only from the civil point of view...

 

As hodge would say...Bingo, Bango, Boingo. You have affirmed my point: We are all equal, but we have undeniable physiological differences. This is not an issue of gay rights under the law. What gays actually are after is to make everyone think, believe, and act like gays are exactly like non-gays in every respect. Equal rights under the law is not enough, they want everyone to believe with their hearts and minds that they are the same in every respect as non-gays. We aren't.

Hodge also tried to insinuate that this was akin to "separate but equal" - Wrong! No one has ever advocated on this thread isolating gays due to their differences. In fact, I would argue that gays isolate themselves! San Francisco is a bastion of gays and they even refer to themselves as "the gay community". If gays believe so strongly and urgently that they are the same in every respect as non-gays, they should be happy and comfortable with themselves having equal rights under the law without trying to erase and blur the identity of man/woman married couples. A mule is not a horse, and vice versa.

 

Let me tell you all just how simple this is.

1. For every gay male that wants to marry a man, they have just put 2 single women back on the market. 1GM+1GM=2 Single women

2. We have all seen the T-shirt for sale.
" I support gay marriage as long as both chicks are hott"

Thats all there is. Pretty simple huh?

 

very well said and i feel thats the problem with our nation we want to be the "same" or "equal" but want to be treated better. Some people will like you some wont, thats how it works for everybody

 

Sort of like increasing the number of shots on goal, right Sarge! I like it.....

 

I think some equate the tendencies to think bestiality as similar in thought to thinking about sex with another man the same way you associate religion with intolerance.