Non-political things that make you say...WTF?!?! (Welcome To Florida!) **NOT CV RELATED** NO TALKY!

This guy could probably beat that
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQMyGs34sUA

 

Why can't I ever run into these road rage people....I would sue his ass for making me beat him profusely

 

Well, that was quite the vocabulary

 

His butt just needed some fresh air

 

edit: they were all marines? haha

 

.........
wut

 

Should have gotten out...taken a few hits and enacted the Castle doctrine.

 

And maybe get puked on? Decency would be calling TSA and asking how the hell the guy got through screening.

 

Not a single $#(% was given that day.

 

There is no Castle Doctrine in Cali.

 

yet another reason I will stay away

 

States with a Castle Law
No duty to retreat if in the home.
Alaska - Alaska Statute 11.81.335(b) provides that an individual has no duty to retreat before using deadly force if they are in their home, their workplace, protecting a child or protecting a family member. The 27th Alaska Legislature is currently considering H.B. 80 "An Act relating to self defense in any place where a person has a right to be." which would essentially eliminate the duty to retreat for any place a person is legally, making Alaska a "stand your ground" state. However, an identical measure, H.B. 381, failed to pass the 26th Alaska Legislature.
California California Penal Code § 198.5 sets forth that "Any person using force intended or likely to cause death or great bodily injury within his or her residence shall be presumed to have held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily injury to self, family, or a member of the household when that force is used against another person, not a member of the family or household, who unlawfully and forcibly enters or has unlawfully and forcibly entered the residence and the person using the force knew or had reason to believe that an unlawful and forcible entry occurred."[17] This would make the homicide justifiable under CPC § 197.[18] CALCRIM 506 gives the instruction, "A defendant is not required to retreat. He or she is entitled to stand his ground and defend himself and, if reasonably necessary, to pursue an assailant until the danger ... has passed. This is so even if safety could have been achieved by retreating." However, it also states that "[People v. Ceballos] specifically held that burglaries which 'do not reasonably create a fear of great bodily harm' are not sufficient 'cause for exaction of human life.'” The court held that because the defendant had constructed a gun-firing trap, the doctrine did not apply because mechanical devices are without mercy or discretion.[19]

 

Yep! Not in washington tho it would have been a huge battle not to go to prison for murder..... I hate this state, but love idaho!

 

pfft, Castle Doctrine

Its all about that Stand-Your-Ground Law.

 

of course he has a chunky girlfriend

 

Only applies within your residence, not your vehicle. Plus, in your vehicle you're not allowed to have a loaded weapon within reach of the driver. It has to be in a locked case, with the ammunition separate from the gun (not in the same compartment). It also cannot be in the glove box or center console, even if locked (e.g. gun safe). In the case of the video, he would have had to get the gun case from the back of the vehicle, unlock it, load it and then defend himself.

http://source.southuniversity.edu/castle-doctrine-from-state-to-state-46514.aspx

 

Priceless!!!

 

that is freakin awesome.