Creationism vs. Evolution

The Canadian Carpenter and my forum friend agrees...

Not to be confused with The Jewish Carpenter and my savior...

 

Edited

 

good on ya!

I'm going to bed and read the sports section of the paper.

G'nite all you worshipers and heathens alike.

 

You've rejected carbon dating on rumors you've heard since you were a kid. Google yourself, I've seen your response to past links.

Googled evolution and here is the second offering, knock yourself out.

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/

 

Some current thought on evolution released today.

http://pda.sciencealert.com.au/opinions/20132706-24518-2.html

 

Oracles are your forte, you won't find that there.

 

I know its an opinion piece, but it was written as if most humans live in wealthy conditions. And have a dentist or brush their teeth ofter. There are billions of people who dont have that.

 

How do you explain earthquakes without plate tectonics ?

Oh wait .... I think I know

 

Ill admit plate tectonics is plausible, but when physically looking at a mountain
its hard to see the theory in front of me on paper it sounds good tho. Also wonder how buttes formed. when they are clearly not on a fault line. There are plenty of mountains not on the edge of a fault line. so how did those ones form?

Its been a long time since ive been in any kind of geography/geology type class.

 

Were you expecting "we now know everything"?

 

Really Tostidos, go ahead and do a little research, there are plenty of sources to help you visualize how geologists think things formed. No need relying on just wondering.

 

you are killing me with this "I sniff my own farts attitude".

I know how it works on paper thats what i said. But if you get out and go outside for once in your life and actually look at something maybe youll question something you read or see on the internet.

 

How would you explain earthquakes , layered strata , lava , undersea vents without plate tectonics ?

 

Your hardly veiled questions you admit are really pokes at evolutions don't make you sound serious. Come visit Dinosaur Ridge a short drive from where I live, and actually see fossils imbedded in an exposed cross section showing layer after layer that can be dated from volcanic evidence.

Red Rocks amphitheater is a few miles further and is formed from the mountain range that predated the later Rocky Mountains. I can see it clearly, but you assume I haven't tried?????

 

You assume when i question one part of a theory that I am dismissing all evidence. And again ill state. Its a theory. But seriously i look at the san gabriel mountains and just by "look" it looks more as if someone dumped dirt and rocks there rather than it poked out of the ground by slowly colliding. and then i take in the whole picture, where are the ripples leading up to the mountain that would be there conducive to pushing against each other. why are there other mountains around there instead of the ripples? why are there buttes with damn near flat ground for miles around tit? Just an observation of what it "looks like". now im sure there is science to go along with it, im just stating how it looks.

 

i wouldn't i'm not a geologist.

 

Buttes are generally from erosion

 

a built up area that was eroded away into a butte?

 

Googled, how are buttes formed. Again you wonder instead of doing a little reading.

http://education.nationalgeographic.com/education/encyclopedia/butte/?ar_a=1

 

Harder rock stays behind , softer rock is eroded