CEO of Starbucks speaks out

Me either, to be quite honest.

But I like my Americanos with a side of 5.56.

 

Imagine a White Mormom baker denying a gay black muslim couple cake. That would be a constitutional orgy

 

I think I just orgasmed.

 

I didn't see it


AMENDMENT XIV
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868.

Note: Article I, section 2, of the Constitution was modified by section 2 of the 14th amendment.

Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 2.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age,* and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Section 5.
The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

 

...rifles should be properly carried on a sling, not in hand...

 

x2

This is a perfect letter.

It does not ban guns so there is no real anti-2A statement, people are still free to follow the laws.

It will only piss of both of the extremest ends that can not be reasonable.

Same as before... just no one will want to use Starbucks as a location to pump their propaganda.

 

Fair enough. The 14th Amendment deals with discriminatory laws, not private policies.

 

I am usually unreasonable until I have my starbucks every morning. Now thanks to their CEO, I will stay unreasonable!

 

There is nothing wrong, it is just not right!


How can it be wrong when she is left handed!

 

Holy shit we agree on something!

 

unless it was the LAPD...I'd run!

 

I don't care if people have their guns heck I feel a lot safer in a gun show or with a gun than I do without one

 

its called paranoia if you cant be without your gun for a few minutes and hoping for shit to pop off- to be the hero...probably better you crazy folks arent around normal people getting their coffee...

 

paranoia is libtards scared my glock 23 is gonna jump out of my holster and pistol whip you while you pour nutmeg in your soy latte

 

Just go in there and get your darn coffee, oh..there's a drivethu too. (Most of em)

 

Why can't it be both?

 

paranoia is taking your Glock 23 to Starbucks for some fuckin joe and you thinking everyone is out to get you cause you look like a moron sporting a gun, I love guns too but get a grip!

 

To be honest, there is a certain amount of paranoia that comes along with seeing someone open carry.

Contrary to what firearm activists (not enthusiast, not owners -- activists) seem to forget is that, unlike any other tool, a firearm is a symbol of violence. Violence is its main purpose. Open carry is an in-your-face reminder of this. It takes one person getting his or her extra hot organic soy latte not quite hot enough to whip out the G and leave people leakin' (in theory).

It's the same phenomena with seeing dudes who wear TapouT shirts. I'm not even a chick, but I can't shake the feeling I'm gonna get date-raped.