NFL Trash Talkers Thread

Meanwhile in Oakland..

 

I don't think the Jets forced Sanchez to eat Chili Dogs on the side lines in the middle of a game while the Jets Defense was on the field. . .QB's that take their job seriously don't do that.

Sanchez doesn't have what it takes.

 

Do people not realize how good Seattle's D is? All this talk about how they couldn't slow down the Eagles... All this talk about how Sanchez had it bad in New York and now he has all these "weapons."

I didn't post anything, as usual, before the game but gimme a break. Philadelphia.. you aren't going to beat a good defense with a hurry up offense. quick 3 and out after quick 3 and out. 41:56 to 18:04 possession..

10/20 for 96 Yards
17 for 50 yards

139 total yards

 

No huddle offense it's the hawks Achilles heel and I am a hawks fan but the eagles did not execute it well.

 

You said that earlier and I chuckled. Where exactly is the evidence that points at that? No huddle works well against teams with slow team speed on defense. The Seahawks have without a doubt the fastest team in the league. I could see if Red Bryant and Brandon Mebane were still in there maybe but were small and fast on the defensive line. Avril and Bennett aren't getting winded.

The no huddle only works when you can dink and dunk for 1st down after 1st down. Long sustained drives.

No chance against this defense.

 

Well the Niners shit the bed against the Raiders... what a horrible game. First play set the tone.

 

Tough to provide proof. All I can say is look at every game the hawks have played against a no huddle or 2 minute drill. Defensive speed has absolutely nothing to do with defending against the a no huddle or 2 minute offense. It is all about proper substitution.

The eagles for some reason did not run a quick game and I don't know if that had to do with the refs but that was a benefit.

Go hawks. And Thursday night go Rams.

 

That 44 yd PI call on Fletcher in the third quarter was questionable to say the least, but then to watch Sherman get away with one on the next Eagles possession was just ridiculous.

 

No offense but every NFL analyst will disagree with you. The core of the no huddle offense that the Eagles run is dink and dunk. They rely on spreading you out and hitting the edges with a passing game that has a lot of screens, dump-offs and short routes. That's why they coveted Sproles so much.

When you have great team speed on defense you can still play your base defense knowing you can get to the edge just as quick as them.

Let Sherman and the DB's play man and allow Thomas and Chancellor to fly up and to the edges.

Sure, substitutions are important but that when you are a mediocre or even a good defense. The Seahawks are not a "good" defense, they are the best defense in the NFL in the last decade easy.

 

Last decade is a little much. Last three seasons. Yes.

Seahawks still rely on substitution.

 

Hahahaha... goood one!

 

Freeney is owning Solder.

 

I want the Chargers to win out just because of Eric Weddle and his beard.

 

http://www.sportsonearth.com/articl...ses-in-history-seattle-seahawks-chicago-bears

http://nypost.com/2014/02/03/where-do-the-seahawks-rank-here-are-the-top-10-defenses-ever/

http://www.si.com/nfl/audibles/2014/02/04/best-defenses-super-bowl-era-seattle-seahawks

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-super-bowl/0ap2000000320679/Where-does-Seahawks-defense-rank-all-time

Warren Sapp says if they beat Den in the SB they join us as one of the best ever. Considering they absolutely shut down Den, the best offense in the history of the NFL..

3 separate articles and 1 video from independent non-Seattles people that put the Seahawks as the best defense of the last decade.

Don't argue with me, argue with the people who know.

 

The Broncos didn't show up that day. The Hawks win wasn't a fluke, but 43-8 was.

 

Gronk beats Teó, but Brady underthrows him and Teó picks it, LMAO!

 

Terrible pass

 

Broncos showed up, Manning was 34/47 that day. Demarious Thomas had 18 receptions that day