1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Better mileage with shell?

Discussion in 'Tonneau Covers, Caps and Shells' started by ctagz, May 29, 2019.

  1. May 29, 2019 at 4:34 PM
    #1
    ctagz

    ctagz [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2016
    Member:
    #193485
    Messages:
    357
    Gender:
    Male
    Fountain Valley, CA
    Vehicle:
    2017 TRD Sport dcsb - Inferno
    20190529_140903.jpg16 miles on 405 freeway: Long Beach to HB. Doing 70-75. Just got shell last week and was expecting slight reduction due to weight. I do this drive often. I never got better than 22-23 mpg with oem tonneau on truck.

    For those of you unfamiliar with the area, this is flat freeway near coast. No downhill and no wind today.
     
  2. Jun 12, 2019 at 5:24 AM
    #2
    Mtn Mike

    Mtn Mike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2017
    Member:
    #234494
    Messages:
    754
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mike
    Spokane, WA
    Vehicle:
    2017 TRD OR AC
    I haven't noticed a significant change in MPG with or without a shell on any truck I've owned.
     
  3. Jun 12, 2019 at 5:49 AM
    #3
    Rock Lobster

    Rock Lobster Thread Derailer

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2018
    Member:
    #275833
    Messages:
    13,404
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Ryan
    Dee Eff Dub
    Vehicle:
    I drive a Miata.
    shell, tonneau, tailgate up, tailgate down, it really honestly doesnt matter, despite what mythbusters say. A quick google search shows that every pickup owner with a blog tried this experiment, and they all reached different conclusions. Weed out the ones that didnt perform the test under controlled conditions (almost all of them), and you still have conflicting results. In statistical lingo, that means the actual difference does not exceed the variance seen under normal driving conditions. Or in other words, negligible.

    The 405 is a strange animal to do the test on; there are way too many variables besides wind. Theres a major draft effect when you get a mass amount of vehicles going in the same direction. (did you ever notice a morning where the fog has settled on the surface streets, but the freeways are oddly clear?) That draft effect changes by the minute, depending on traffic density, speed, ratio of trucks to cars, etc. Theres also subtle changes going on in your foot. Chances are fewer cars jumped out in front of you today, which means fewer corrections on the pedal.

    Id say the difference is all in your foot. And if youre achieving numbers north of 21 consistently, be proud of yourself, youre doing it right. :thumbsup:
     

Products Discussed in

To Top