1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Tires: load range E vs C

Discussion in 'Wheels & Tires' started by chris66, Feb 6, 2016.

  1. Feb 6, 2016 at 7:30 PM
    #1
    chris66

    chris66 [OP] ( ͡°( ͡° ͜ʖ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)ʖ ͡°) ͡°)

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2012
    Member:
    #81227
    Messages:
    423
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    dust
    CO
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prerunner
    bfg at ko2, method double standard
    hey guys would their be any noticeable difference in performance (mpgs, get up & go) with load range C tires vs E? I currently have 265/75/16 bfg at ko2 E tires since I got them almost as soon as they were available. all that was available was load range E and now i have seen that there are load range C tires available i was wondering if they would suit my 1st gen better. i believe the E range tire is 53 lbs vs the 47 lb load range c tire

    my truck is a lot slower as it is since i'm in CO but this is something i've been thinking about lately. hopefully i'll be in Mississippi in a year and then florida eventually
     
    Last edited: Feb 6, 2016
  2. Feb 6, 2016 at 7:48 PM
    #2
    TacoDan723

    TacoDan723 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2015
    Member:
    #157821
    Messages:
    278
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Dan
    Pacific Northwest
    Vehicle:
    2015 MGM Tacoma Limited
    I just looked at the BFG site and didn't see a 16" tire in load rating "c" in the size you list above.
     
  3. Feb 6, 2016 at 7:52 PM
    #3
    chris66

    chris66 [OP] ( ͡°( ͡° ͜ʖ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)ʖ ͡°) ͡°)

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2012
    Member:
    #81227
    Messages:
    423
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    dust
    CO
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prerunner
    bfg at ko2, method double standard
    my mistake. i think it might have been the 265/70/17 c range. :smash:
    still wondering if the weight makes any difference. the c range duratrac is 45 lbs which was my other choice for a tire
     
  4. Feb 6, 2016 at 8:00 PM
    #4
    bullaculla

    bullaculla IKA fabrications

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2012
    Member:
    #89002
    Messages:
    8,155
    Gender:
    Male
    Da big big island!
    Vehicle:
    2013 MGM DCSB Tacoma 4X4 TRD Off Road
    All pro 3 link SAS kit, Diamond axle, kings on 37" MTR/K
    Yes it should. I was getting consistent 18-20 mpg per tank average with load C duratracs in 265/75/16.
     
    chris66[OP] likes this.
  5. Feb 6, 2016 at 8:36 PM
    #5
    bry838

    bry838 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2014
    Member:
    #137527
    Messages:
    2,403
    Gender:
    Male
    oregon
    Vehicle:
    '00 tacoma 2.7 4x4 reg cab 5speed x's 2. '01 T4R 3.4 5 speed
    That weight will definitely make a difference, hiw much? I dont know but that weight has an impact. Also and id say more importantly at least in my eyes for what i like, id go for the C tires just for less back and kidney pain. If set a the pressures listed on the door sticker your truck will ride much less stiff and harsh. Put em at 26 psi and itll feel alot better. The tires are part of the suspension on these rigs...and for such a light vehicle those E rated tires are not needed.
     
    chris66[OP] likes this.
  6. Feb 6, 2016 at 8:38 PM
    #6
    Sharpish

    Sharpish Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2016
    Member:
    #173981
    Messages:
    3,824
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Brian
    Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2012 Tacoma TRD OR 4x4
    I'm interested as well. I have stock TRD OR 16" wheels and 265/70/16 KO2. Gas mileage is less of a concern to me vs acceleration and ride comfort. The E loads transmit the impact shock of sharp edged road imperfections right through the entire truck.

    I'm considering buying a set of 17" take off 4Runner trail team rims and C load KO2 and selling my setup. Not sure it will be worth the $600+ cost of upgrading.
     
  7. Feb 6, 2016 at 8:59 PM
    #7
    chris66

    chris66 [OP] ( ͡°( ͡° ͜ʖ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)ʖ ͡°) ͡°)

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2012
    Member:
    #81227
    Messages:
    423
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    dust
    CO
    Vehicle:
    2004 Prerunner
    bfg at ko2, method double standard
    cost is also part of the reason I am considering sucking it up but if it is going to prematurely wear components and not make it as enjoyable to drive I think the money might be worth it. it's kind of ironic since i ended up going with the ko2s since they were so much cheaper than the duratracs
     
  8. Feb 9, 2016 at 9:50 AM
    #8
    Sharpish

    Sharpish Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2016
    Member:
    #173981
    Messages:
    3,824
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Brian
    Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2012 Tacoma TRD OR 4x4
    My concern as well is that the rough ride is loosening everything up on the truck ... I don't want to end up with a rattle box. Running the E loads at 29 psi is just going to wreck the tires, the stiff sidewall won't be happy flexing that much.

    I got a bead on some brand new take-off 2016 4Runner trail teams. If it goes through, I'm going to run the stock BFG H/T that are mounted to those rims and see what they ride like. KO2 sure look awesome though :)
     
  9. Feb 9, 2016 at 4:07 PM
    #9
    2nd screen name

    2nd screen name Tacodelaplaya

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Member:
    #169943
    Messages:
    286
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Bob
    LV/SD
    Vehicle:
    06 AC Sport Prerunner
    Front: Maxtrac, DK heim UCA, 6112 Rear: AP expos, Fox 2.5 RR DSC Fn fivestar with General reds
    I live in San Diego our roads suck. I have e rated generals at 70psi and they aren't bad. I did have a lowered honda before...lol
     
  10. Feb 12, 2016 at 10:19 AM
    #10
    Maticuno

    Maticuno Resident Pine Swine

    Joined:
    May 26, 2011
    Member:
    #57287
    Messages:
    3,821
    Gender:
    Male
    California High Deserts
    Vehicle:
    2011 Suburban 2500
    JBA Shorty Headers, Flowmaster FlowFX Sing/Dual Exhaust
    E load tires are completely overkill and a massive waste of money on these trucks.
     
    mustangwilly and bry838 like this.
  11. Feb 12, 2016 at 10:20 AM
    #11
    OZ-T

    OZ-T I hate my neighbour

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2009
    Member:
    #27584
    Messages:
    50,587
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Peter North
    British Columbia
    Vehicle:
    Mag Grey 09 Trd Sport DCLB 4x4
    OME 885x , OME shocks and Dakars , Wheelers SuperBumps front and rear , 275/70/17 Hankook ATm , OEM bed mat , Weathertech digifit floor liners , Weathertech in-channel vents , headache rack , Leer 100RCC commercial canopy , TRD bedside decals removed , Devil Horns by Andres , HomerTaco Satoshi
    Some tires only come in E rated in some sizes
     
  12. Feb 12, 2016 at 10:24 AM
    #12
    kashtyaatsi

    kashtyaatsi DieselDub

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2015
    Member:
    #164774
    Messages:
    4,616
    First Name:
    Asher
    Bitterroot, MT
    Vehicle:
    LPC's
    Broken
    I have E rated KO2's in 265/75/16 set at 40psi cold. Ride doesn't seem harsh to me. Actually wish the suspension was stiffer.
     
  13. Feb 12, 2016 at 2:27 PM
    #13
    2nd screen name

    2nd screen name Tacodelaplaya

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Member:
    #169943
    Messages:
    286
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Bob
    LV/SD
    Vehicle:
    06 AC Sport Prerunner
    Front: Maxtrac, DK heim UCA, 6112 Rear: AP expos, Fox 2.5 RR DSC Fn fivestar with General reds
    Yeah my tires only come in e rated and I prefer it for offroading in the desert. I don't want a puncture out there.
     
  14. Feb 12, 2016 at 3:05 PM
    #14
    Maticuno

    Maticuno Resident Pine Swine

    Joined:
    May 26, 2011
    Member:
    #57287
    Messages:
    3,821
    Gender:
    Male
    California High Deserts
    Vehicle:
    2011 Suburban 2500
    JBA Shorty Headers, Flowmaster FlowFX Sing/Dual Exhaust
    I accidentally ordered E load Duratracs for my work Tacoma. They ride like shit on bumpy desert roads and I've still had two punctures. The load rating makes little difference, if something sharp wants to poke your tire, it will.
     
  15. Feb 12, 2016 at 3:11 PM
    #15
    kashtyaatsi

    kashtyaatsi DieselDub

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2015
    Member:
    #164774
    Messages:
    4,616
    First Name:
    Asher
    Bitterroot, MT
    Vehicle:
    LPC's
    Broken
    On road E is fine, but as soon as I plan to be on a dirt road for any amount of time I always air down.
     
  16. Feb 12, 2016 at 3:11 PM
    #16
    bry838

    bry838 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2014
    Member:
    #137527
    Messages:
    2,403
    Gender:
    Male
    oregon
    Vehicle:
    '00 tacoma 2.7 4x4 reg cab 5speed x's 2. '01 T4R 3.4 5 speed
    Yeah load rating dosent mean much as far as punture protection goes.
     
  17. Feb 13, 2016 at 7:47 PM
    #17
    TacoSeattle

    TacoSeattle Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2015
    Member:
    #167806
    Messages:
    264
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2016 Tacoma TRD OR 4x4 v6 SB Quicksand
    I also tried KO2 in 265/75 16 and they were harsh on the freeway and offload and impacted mpg by an estimated 1.5 to 2 if ran at 32 psi cold all around. I also was worried about rattles and stress on parts like axels over the long haul (65,000 miles). I tried the Dura Tracs in stock size 265/70 16 and they were less harsh but very noisy with a high pitched whine. Ended up with Cooper AT3's in stock size 265/70 16 and they are best for my needs all around. The E rated tires however have thicker sidewalls so off road they would give greater puncture resistance. Just IMO.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top