1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

2015 (4.0lt) vs 2016 (3.6lt) Tacoma TRO

Discussion in '3rd Gen. Tacomas (2016-2023)' started by ZR2, Apr 2, 2016.

  1. Apr 2, 2016 at 10:55 AM
    #1
    ZR2

    ZR2 [OP] Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2016
    Member:
    #183101
    Messages:
    9
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    Undecided yet...
    Hi there, first time posting [​IMG]
    I'm looking to purchase either or vehicle and i'm looking for an opinions on which you would choose and why. I prefer the look of the 2015 but the allure of a smaller/stronger fuel efficient? engine draws me to the 2016 but there might be possible bugs/issues that still have arisen yet
    Any thought/opinions will be appreciated...looking at 1-2 yr old used in the 20,000km range
    Located in Toronto, Canada
    Thanks [​IMG]
     
  2. Apr 2, 2016 at 11:04 AM
    #2
    crashnburn80

    crashnburn80 Vehicle Design Engineer

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2015
    Member:
    #156893
    Messages:
    14,772
    Gender:
    Male
    Kirkland, WA
    Vehicle:
    2003 DCSB TRD OR
    Welcome to TW!

    The 3.5 has more top end HP in stock form, but the 4.0 is a proven platform that has more low end torque. If you want stronger, adding the supercharger to the 4.0 and have way more HP and torque than the 3.5. I bought a 2015 because I wanted to supercharge it with the factory supercharger, and the program was discontinued and not developed for the 3.5.

    1st gen vs 2nd gen vs 3rd gen:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbmOYTMirrw
     
    digitaLbraVo likes this.
  3. Apr 2, 2016 at 11:05 AM
    #3
    crashnburn80

    crashnburn80 Vehicle Design Engineer

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2015
    Member:
    #156893
    Messages:
    14,772
    Gender:
    Male
    Kirkland, WA
    Vehicle:
    2003 DCSB TRD OR
    digitaLbraVo[QUOTED] likes this.
  4. Apr 2, 2016 at 11:06 AM
    #4
    digitaLbraVo

    digitaLbraVo Derka Derka

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2012
    Member:
    #86398
    Messages:
    7,514
    Covered in stickers and chrome stick-ons for extra horse torques and foot powers. Icon sticker gets me tons of travel, dozens of milimeters.
    @crashnburn80 Magnus is the manufacturer of the TRD Supercharger for the 4.0L. I don' think they've released it, yet, but it should be out soon just without the "TRD" name on it. Performance is the same.
     
  5. Apr 2, 2016 at 11:12 AM
    #5
    crashnburn80

    crashnburn80 Vehicle Design Engineer

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2015
    Member:
    #156893
    Messages:
    14,772
    Gender:
    Male
    Kirkland, WA
    Vehicle:
    2003 DCSB TRD OR
    I'm aware. The 4.0 Tacoma kit was released, with a nice price hike.
    http://urdusa.com/store/Forced-Indu...harger,-2005-2015-Tacoma-V6/product_info.html

    It seems unlikely they will develop a supercharger for the atkinson 3.5. Especially with Toyota cancelling the program.
     
  6. Apr 2, 2016 at 11:28 AM
    #6
    digitaLbraVo

    digitaLbraVo Derka Derka

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2012
    Member:
    #86398
    Messages:
    7,514
    Covered in stickers and chrome stick-ons for extra horse torques and foot powers. Icon sticker gets me tons of travel, dozens of milimeters.
    Price hike? Isn't that what a TRD used to cost??
     
  7. Apr 2, 2016 at 11:57 AM
    #7
    crashnburn80

    crashnburn80 Vehicle Design Engineer

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2015
    Member:
    #156893
    Messages:
    14,772
    Gender:
    Male
    Kirkland, WA
    Vehicle:
    2003 DCSB TRD OR
    They raised it by about $1300 over list. But you used to be able to get it for even less from places like trdpartsforu. I ended up paying $4300 for mine.
    Pic of my dealer receipt here: https://www.tacomaworld.com/threads...ger-fit-kit-for-sale-660-seattle-area.379940/

    /Endthreadjack.

    OP I would drive both and see what you like best. I personally like the 2015 body better, but the 2016 interior better. The 4.0 1GR-FE is a true truck engine used in the land cruiser with legendary durability, which I found appealing for an off road truck. The 5 speed auto in the 2nd gen is also a good reliable unit and people don't complain about how it shifts.
     
  8. Apr 2, 2016 at 1:27 PM
    #8
    renau001

    renau001 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2015
    Member:
    #172744
    Messages:
    129
    Gender:
    Male
    Drive both by yourself back-to-back, same day. There is really no better way to find out.
     
  9. Apr 2, 2016 at 1:39 PM
    #9
    Pittrider

    Pittrider Pitty, those needing correction.

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2015
    Member:
    #168558
    Messages:
    3,883
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Greg
    B.C.
    Vehicle:
    2016 MGM LTD LB
    Do you need to know, or care?
    Test drive both, and not just around the block. Take it onto the highway, drive it up a couple hills (yes, there are a few in TO), do light acceleration and hard acceleration. Just drive it! Then go over everything with a fine tooth comb, checking out all accessories, storage, etc everything you might care about. Next is price, can you afford the one you decide on? If not, keep looking, don't go too deep into debt if you don't have the cash. Are you planning on racing it? If no, then don't worry about Superchargers.

    IMOP, both are solid trucks, I owned a '13 Gen2 and it 100% served me well.

    It's a matter of opinion, Gen2 owners will tell you to by that and Gen3 will tell you to buy there's. Buy what's right for you, don't listen to all the doomsayers from both Gens.

    Good luck! But most of all enjoy the new ride when you get it.
     
  10. Apr 2, 2016 at 2:08 PM
    #10
    JasonMcvic

    JasonMcvic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2013
    Member:
    #102484
    Messages:
    123
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jason
    I've had both. Hands down third gen is better. 22mpg (us gallon ) mixed driving. vs 18.5 in my gen 2. Smoother and more refined. People moan about torque and hp.

    Fact is if i want to tow my trailer i take my duramax. If i want to go fast I take out my 911.

    The tacoma is a swiss army knife of the automotive world. Its not the best at any one thing but really good at a lot of things.
     
  11. Apr 2, 2016 at 2:49 PM
    #11
    judgeman6970

    judgeman6970 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2010
    Member:
    #35763
    Messages:
    332
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Bob
    Long Island, NY
    interesting new question...2nd gen vs 3rd gen??:argue:
     
  12. Apr 2, 2016 at 7:10 PM
    #12
    eldedo

    eldedo voted most likely eaten by a bear

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2015
    Member:
    #172201
    Messages:
    1,820
    Gender:
    Male
    Mojave Desert
    Vehicle:
    '16 DCSBOR 4X4
    2888/5100/Dakars 285's/Camburgs
    they are two different trucks in behaviour. This thread almost make me want to ....trade down maybe a 2015 trd pro then get the supercharger kit.
     
  13. Apr 3, 2016 at 6:12 PM
    #13
    ZR2

    ZR2 [OP] Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2016
    Member:
    #183101
    Messages:
    9
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    Undecided yet...
    Interesting replies so far...thanks for the tips/advice
     
  14. Jul 25, 2016 at 7:10 AM
    #14
    bijick

    bijick such mods much want

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2016
    Member:
    #174469
    Messages:
    1,721
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    E
    Stl
    Vehicle:
    2013 MGM Singular Cabular Selectable
    OME 884’s ,Dakar hd’s, Jba uca, lce header, 4.88’s, Arb locker , j shift tcase-T4R, arb bumper, leer topper, 3500w inverter, mad wife, scratched paint, skid plates, snorkelerer, led flush mount reverse lights, etc..
    Very sorry to bring this out of the crypt but damn that's hilarious.. This guy/girl is trying to decide between 2 trucks, most likely because he/she can't afford a $60k truck and a $100k car alongside it. It's cool that you have those options for vehicles, but shit dude 99% of the people here don't live that life.. Sorry again for bumping this.. That irritated the hell out of me.
     
    RJ_MacReady likes this.
  15. Jul 25, 2016 at 7:20 AM
    #15
    Z50king

    Z50king DCLBOR4X4FTW

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2015
    Member:
    #157056
    Messages:
    8,402
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Eric
    Southern California
    Vehicle:
    2016 DCLB Off Road 4x4 Super White
    Stock and loving it
    Strange how more than half the posters in here are listed as having second gens
     
  16. Jul 25, 2016 at 7:40 AM
    #16
    DaveInDenver

    DaveInDenver Not Actually in Denver

    Joined:
    May 18, 2013
    Member:
    #104390
    Messages:
    3,619
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    David
    Grand Junction
    Vehicle:
    2008 Super White TRDOR AC 6MT
    Unexceptional
    For the person who doesn't also own a 911 and a Duramax so must slum it with one vehicle the question remains. Sounds like to me if your needs are more car than truck that a 3.5L 3rd gen probably will make you happy but if do more towing or off road that a 4.0L 2nd gen might be better suited?
     

Products Discussed in

To Top