1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

2016 4 banger thread

Discussion in '4 Cylinder' started by offthewallsurfer, Sep 29, 2015.

  1. Oct 17, 2016 at 5:38 AM
    #181
    jeffmansion

    jeffmansion Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2016
    Member:
    #190226
    Messages:
    778
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    16UTILITY4x4MT2.7
    K&N 63 series CAI, AVS Vent Visors, 16x8 Level 8 MK6 Rims, 285/75/16 MT, Eibach Pro lift, JBA UCAs, Wheelers 3leaf AAL, RokBloks XL mud flaps, DV8 skidplate, Westin bedmat, Backrack, swaybar delete, Magnaflow cat-back, 9Drive throttle controller, 2LO Mod, Cali Raised Sliders, Tyger rear bumper, Avid front bumper guard.
    I'd go for the 6 at that point. I bought my truck because of the price. 23K for an SR utility was all i could afford! Any other truck in my area would of been a significant amount more money, and much higher payments.
     
  2. Oct 17, 2016 at 8:35 AM
    #182
    7r41lbr34k3r

    7r41lbr34k3r Practitioner of the mechanical arts.

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2016
    Member:
    #196549
    Messages:
    3,090
    Gender:
    Male
    Houston, TX
    Vehicle:
    '21 Tundra 1794 OR
    The 3.5L needs to be proven out before I'd consider it. Personally, I was close to pulling the trigger on a DCSB 6MT TRD Sport, but I just didn't want to deal with the questionable drive train. I'll eventually need greater towing capacity, as well as the ability to haul 4-5 adults ... but that day is likely not for another 10 years or so. This made the 2.7 an easy decision for me. I have a friend with a 2nd Gen 2.7, so I was very familiar with its capabilities.

    Also, considering manual transmission is a MUST for me ... I ended up saving about $8-9k by going with the 2.7L. Spec'ing out a V6 w/ would cost $34k. Paid $25,350 for the SR. Hard to complain from where I sit.
     
    CusterFan likes this.
  3. Oct 28, 2016 at 9:51 AM
    #183
    srdoublecab2.7

    srdoublecab2.7 SRlifted&gifted

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2016
    Member:
    #199815
    Messages:
    569
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mike
    Austin, Tx
    Vehicle:
    2017 DC SR 2.7 MGM
    Stock for a minute
    I did the same thing, I was about to order a 17 TRD OR 6 spd manual and decided the good ol 2.7 would do what I needed it to do for many years to come.

    That being said, 2.7 and 285s? is it possible or should i just stick to 265s and some scs f5s?
     
  4. Oct 28, 2016 at 12:07 PM
    #184
    texascolt45

    texascolt45 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2012
    Member:
    #93182
    Messages:
    489
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    mike
    groves texas
    Vehicle:
    prerunner 4 cylinder
    wheels,bilsteins,side bars
    I have 265/75-16's on my 09 2.7.you can feel a little difference between stock,but still totally driveable.been thinking of getting a 2017 v-6 though.theres not much difference in the mileage,real world.
     
  5. Oct 28, 2016 at 12:50 PM
    #185
    srdoublecab2.7

    srdoublecab2.7 SRlifted&gifted

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2016
    Member:
    #199815
    Messages:
    569
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mike
    Austin, Tx
    Vehicle:
    2017 DC SR 2.7 MGM
    Stock for a minute
  6. Oct 30, 2016 at 7:58 PM
    #186
    mikestaco17

    mikestaco17 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2016
    Member:
    #200502
    Messages:
    819
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    MIKE
    Vehicle:
    BAD ASS UTILITY CAB
    just got the 2.7 in my 17 4x4 automatic utility cab love it had the 2.7 in my 96 Tacoma xtracab but was a 5 spd went 301,000 miles that was my reason love my new truck
     
    Ruggybuggy and CusterFan like this.
  7. Nov 5, 2016 at 11:10 AM
    #187
    Sil

    Sil Of the Earth

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2016
    Member:
    #184082
    Messages:
    392
    Gender:
    Male
    Georgia
    Vehicle:
    2017 Tacoma SR MGM i4 5 speed 4x4 aka. Vulcan
    Pending..
    I have been pondering the 4 banger... I have the 16' off-road manual all good and no problems has just over 11k miles and I get 18 in the city 22 on the hwy. I would get the 16' i4 manual 4x4. I do a lot of camping hiking and a lot of miles traveling example driving over 9k miles. How does the 4 do on the hwys around 70 with a couple hundred pounds and AT tires slightly larger than stock on long distances?
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2016
  8. Nov 8, 2016 at 7:40 AM
    #188
    fdb03taco

    fdb03taco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2011
    Member:
    #62596
    Messages:
    1,907
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Danny
    SOMD!
    Vehicle:
    2014 Tundra SR5 CrewMax 5.7 4x4
    Want to meet halfway and trade trucks? :D:D:D I'd love a QS trd manual.

    Anyways, to answer your question it does great on the highways at 70+. I haven't put AT's on my truck yet but I'll probably put 265/70/16's on it at some point. It's not fast, but I've loaded the bed with bales of straw and towed a load of wood piles recently and it acts the same pretty much. Loading up the bed with anything hasn't seemed to hinder performance. With the drag of a trailer the truck seems to like 4th gear the best on the highways. 5th seems too tall, but fuel economy didn't seem impacted too much cruising in 4th at 70 mph.

    I would imagine in a state like Georgia you wouldn't have any issues at all on any highways. It's pretty flat...or flat enough that you could use 5th gear on any highway all the time.
     
    Sil[QUOTED] likes this.
  9. Nov 8, 2016 at 5:06 PM
    #189
    GDT

    GDT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2016
    Member:
    #192398
    Messages:
    627
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    '09 Tacoma 4x4 access base 2.7l 5spd
    It sounds like it's pretty flat where you're from too. I can definitely feel the difference when my truck is loaded, but I live in the hills. It pulls its weight around just fine, but there's no mistaking that it's not empty, thats for sure.

     
  10. Nov 8, 2016 at 5:12 PM
    #190
    Sil

    Sil Of the Earth

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2016
    Member:
    #184082
    Messages:
    392
    Gender:
    Male
    Georgia
    Vehicle:
    2017 Tacoma SR MGM i4 5 speed 4x4 aka. Vulcan
    Pending..
    Thank you for the input. That tire size would more than likely be my biggest tire I would put on it. I do travel around a lot I went up to Maine in the truck and I went to Oregon and back in a Subaru Crosstrek. I started thinking the 2.7 is more common and easier to work with in other countries/places than the 3.5. Thank you again.
     
  11. Nov 8, 2016 at 5:25 PM
    #191
    Sil

    Sil Of the Earth

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2016
    Member:
    #184082
    Messages:
    392
    Gender:
    Male
    Georgia
    Vehicle:
    2017 Tacoma SR MGM i4 5 speed 4x4 aka. Vulcan
    Pending..
    South Ga might be flat, but the foothills are a lot of hills... I have owned 4s all manuals I can understand lower power. It feels as though there is too much going on with the 3.5 Atkinson or Otto and port or direct injection. And just the price of the direct injection alone and 12 injectors will add up.
     
  12. Nov 8, 2016 at 5:47 PM
    #192
    fdb03taco

    fdb03taco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2011
    Member:
    #62596
    Messages:
    1,907
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Danny
    SOMD!
    Vehicle:
    2014 Tundra SR5 CrewMax 5.7 4x4
    I think top end power is a thing these days even for larger V8's. I drive a new F150 for work. I'm currently working in the mountains of MD and the truck regularly shifts down to maintain 70+ mph on highway grades. The truck drops 1 sometimes 2 gears revving to 4-5k rpms. It just has no guts down low from the 5.0L V8.

    It certainly has more power than the 2.7, but the driving characteristics are the same. I'd have no problem driving my 2.7 over the Appalachian passes loaded up for camping, but I wouldn't tow my 3,000 pound boat out here unless I absolutely had to.
     
  13. Nov 8, 2016 at 5:49 PM
    #193
    T4RFTMFW

    T4RFTMFW Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2014
    Member:
    #134525
    Messages:
    69,794
    I've heard 255s are a better set for the 2.7, but I've not tried.

    285s (even in P metric) are supposedly pretty rough in economy and driveability.
     
  14. Nov 10, 2016 at 12:06 AM
    #194
    LakeDouglas

    LakeDouglas Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2016
    Member:
    #202001
    Messages:
    31
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Lake
    Vehicle:
    '19 Black T4R ORP
    This thread prompted me to finally join the forums and stop lurking in the shadows as a guest!

    I had a hard time picking between the I4 and V6 initially, but couldn't be happier with my decision. For most people, and as an everyday truck, the I4 is a fine engine. It gets me to work at about ~23mpg, hauls my 17ft center console with no complaints, and is a quiet ride. I don't think the extra money is worth it unless you have big toys to haul, want to lift your truck, or frequently off-road. Or maybe you just want more power and don't care about the gas savings; to each their own. *Full disclosure, I drive like a grandma anyway*

    Personally, I would rather keep my Tacoma as the daily commuter and build a rig from a 90's 4x4 to play around with out in the woods. However, the perfect truck is the one that fits your budget and lifestyle. If you're happy, I'm happy. (I'm happy)14695377_10153803383816891_1381933525635302374_n.jpg
     
    Greenbean, Markcal, rbark11 and 8 others like this.
  15. Nov 10, 2016 at 4:12 AM
    #195
    fdb03taco

    fdb03taco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2011
    Member:
    #62596
    Messages:
    1,907
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Danny
    SOMD!
    Vehicle:
    2014 Tundra SR5 CrewMax 5.7 4x4
    Details on the 17 ft center console?
     
  16. Nov 10, 2016 at 11:37 AM
    #196
    LakeDouglas

    LakeDouglas Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2016
    Member:
    #202001
    Messages:
    31
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Lake
    Vehicle:
    '19 Black T4R ORP
    Sure! '15 Mako Pro 17. Ironically, I opted for the 60HP Merc over the base 30. :D Entire package + trailer, gas, and gear is maybe a little north of 2K pounds. I use it as a fly fishing platform everywhere from Lake Ontario down to Maryland, and could not recommend it more. The hull is an inverted V, so it doesn't slap in the chop (too bad) and is super stable while casting.

    Note: Towing with the Tacoma (even the I4) much better than my Outback (with the 3.6). :D
     
  17. Nov 10, 2016 at 2:16 PM
    #197
    fdb03taco

    fdb03taco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2011
    Member:
    #62596
    Messages:
    1,907
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Danny
    SOMD!
    Vehicle:
    2014 Tundra SR5 CrewMax 5.7 4x4
    Sounds awesome! I haven't towed my 17ft center console yet, but I think she's a fatty for her size. Boat, motor, trailer is like 2700 lbs without fuel. We'll see how the I4 does. The ramp isn't far from home and I don't tow the boat often as I keep it in a slip.
     
  18. Nov 10, 2016 at 3:08 PM
    #198
    maxpower29

    maxpower29 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2011
    Member:
    #52525
    Messages:
    8,014
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Jordan
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Vehicle:
    2011 Tacoma 4x4 2.7 5 speed SWB
    All season mats, 2nd filter delete, DT header, Jardine cat-back, URD shifter, Bilstein 5100's all around at .85 front with Eibachs + .25 passenger/.5 drivers spacers and 1.5 AAL, 0w20 synthetic, Scanguage II, extra D rings, OEM backup camera+Mirror, bed mat, Extang Solid Fold, Popnlock 5300, Pro Comp 7089's 4.5bs 285/70/17 Revo 2s, De-badged
    Thinking about the 2.7 for a new truck. Was set on the 3.5 but if I buy a 3/4 ton to haul my toys and dont need a 3.5 as much I might do it.......talk me into it
     
  19. Nov 10, 2016 at 3:26 PM
    #199
    LakeDouglas

    LakeDouglas Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2016
    Member:
    #202001
    Messages:
    31
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Lake
    Vehicle:
    '19 Black T4R ORP
    What kind of boat is it? I think the I4 will do great in that capacity. I worry more about the transmission and brakes on longer trips, but the truck hasn't complained yet.
     
  20. Nov 10, 2016 at 3:28 PM
    #200
    fdb03taco

    fdb03taco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2011
    Member:
    #62596
    Messages:
    1,907
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Danny
    SOMD!
    Vehicle:
    2014 Tundra SR5 CrewMax 5.7 4x4
    It's a '97 Boston Whaler 17 Outrage II with a 130 Yamaha. My trailer has surge brakes that do quiet good for what they are.

    On my old truck I always pulled it up the ramp in 4Lo. I'll do the same with this truck. I think I'm going to pull the boat this weekend, so we'll see how she do!
     
To Top