1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Bosch vs NTK wideband O2 sensors

Discussion in 'Performance and Tuning' started by Biscuits, Nov 17, 2016.

  1. Nov 17, 2016 at 5:32 PM
    #1
    Biscuits

    Biscuits [OP] Thorny Crown of Entropy

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2010
    Member:
    #41397
    Messages:
    15,582
    Gender:
    Male
    Swiggity swangin' biggity bangin'
    What are everyone's opinions of these two wideband sensors?

    Has anyone run both?

    How is the longevity and sensitivity of both sensors, particularly the NTK?

    As far as I can tell, most if not everyone here uses the Bosch 4.9 (or 4.2) sensors. Why? Cost and availability? Performance?

    Knowledgeable folks: please share your thoughts and experiences! :)
     
  2. Nov 19, 2016 at 7:23 AM
    #2
    Construct

    Construct Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2016
    Member:
    #193654
    Messages:
    106
    The Bosch LSU 4.9 sensor is most commonly used. Less sensitive to exhaust gas backpressure than the NTK sensor, but requires good sensor temperature control. This means it's important to pair it with a good controller unit.

    The LSU 4.2 is only used in older products that haven't been updated yet. The LSU 4.9 sensor is an improvement in every way.

    The NTK sensors aren't used in many products. Higher backpressure sensitivity could be concerning in an OEM-like exhaust system. I wouldn't be as concerned about EGBP with something like a 3" exhaust with high-flowing cats, though.



    Frankly, all of the major brand wideband systems on the market are usually good enough for applications like this.
     
    Biscuits[OP] likes this.
  3. Nov 19, 2016 at 7:25 AM
    #3
    Biscuits

    Biscuits [OP] Thorny Crown of Entropy

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2010
    Member:
    #41397
    Messages:
    15,582
    Gender:
    Male
    Swiggity swangin' biggity bangin'
    Thank you!

    What makes the NTK more sensitive to backpressure?
     
  4. Nov 19, 2016 at 7:27 AM
    #4
    Construct

    Construct Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2016
    Member:
    #193654
    Messages:
    106
    I don't actually know. Honestly I'm just repeating what I've learned from some automotive equipment developers I know and trust. I've only used the Bosch LSU 4.2 and LSU 4.9 sensors personally.
     
    Biscuits[OP] likes this.
  5. Nov 21, 2016 at 5:14 AM
    #5
    Torspd

    Torspd Tor-nication

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2009
    Member:
    #22958
    Messages:
    25,682
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Tor
    The Great America!
    Vehicle:
    MMVI 4.4L 4x4 Access Cab
    Torspd Custom Turbo kit [] Borg Warner 9180EFR Turbo [] Haltech Elite 2500 [] TiAL Q BOV [] TiAL V44 Wastegate @ 15psi [] CP Pistons [] CP Carrillo Rods [] ARP Head studs [] ARP Main Studs [] ARP Header - Head Studs [] Ported Heads w/ 1mm oversized valves intake/exhaust [] Brian Crower Forged Stroker Crank [] Darton M.I.D. Sleeved Block [] Kelford Camshafts [] Torspd 160* T-stat mod [] APR Large Fuel Rail [] Walbro 460 LPH E85 Fuel Pump [] FueLab FPR [] APR T56 Conversion Kit [] KP RACING Built T56 [] McLeod Racing Custom Twin Disk Clutch [] One Piece Aluminum Driveshaft [] MGW Shifter [] Custom lowering kit [] Ohlins Front Coilovers [] QA1rear shocks [] Custom Ron Davis Radiator [] Dual SPAL Electric Fans []
    Most aftermarket wideband gauge kits come with the LSU 4.2. AEM's newest gauge uses the 4.9. A lot if aftermarket EMS' still use the 4.2. It will take some time still for the market to catch up.

    4.2 reads into the tenths. 4.9 reads into the hundredths, and is faster.
     
    Biscuits[OP] likes this.
  6. Nov 21, 2016 at 5:43 AM
    #6
    Biscuits

    Biscuits [OP] Thorny Crown of Entropy

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2010
    Member:
    #41397
    Messages:
    15,582
    Gender:
    Male
    Swiggity swangin' biggity bangin'
    Thank you Tor.

    I wouldn't use the 4.2 personally, but before going with the Bosch I want the skinny on both Bosch and NTK sensors.
     
  7. Nov 21, 2016 at 6:12 AM
    #7
    Torspd

    Torspd Tor-nication

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2009
    Member:
    #22958
    Messages:
    25,682
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Tor
    The Great America!
    Vehicle:
    MMVI 4.4L 4x4 Access Cab
    Torspd Custom Turbo kit [] Borg Warner 9180EFR Turbo [] Haltech Elite 2500 [] TiAL Q BOV [] TiAL V44 Wastegate @ 15psi [] CP Pistons [] CP Carrillo Rods [] ARP Head studs [] ARP Main Studs [] ARP Header - Head Studs [] Ported Heads w/ 1mm oversized valves intake/exhaust [] Brian Crower Forged Stroker Crank [] Darton M.I.D. Sleeved Block [] Kelford Camshafts [] Torspd 160* T-stat mod [] APR Large Fuel Rail [] Walbro 460 LPH E85 Fuel Pump [] FueLab FPR [] APR T56 Conversion Kit [] KP RACING Built T56 [] McLeod Racing Custom Twin Disk Clutch [] One Piece Aluminum Driveshaft [] MGW Shifter [] Custom lowering kit [] Ohlins Front Coilovers [] QA1rear shocks [] Custom Ron Davis Radiator [] Dual SPAL Electric Fans []
    Seems the other member has a better knowledge on the NTK, than myself.

    You're welcome, for what little I had to offer.
     
    Biscuits[OP] likes this.
  8. Nov 21, 2016 at 6:34 AM
    #8
    Biscuits

    Biscuits [OP] Thorny Crown of Entropy

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2010
    Member:
    #41397
    Messages:
    15,582
    Gender:
    Male
    Swiggity swangin' biggity bangin'
    Regardless of quantity, knowledge is invaluable, and more than what I knew before. So I'm appreciative for every bit.
     
  9. Nov 21, 2016 at 8:23 AM
    #9
    Construct

    Construct Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2016
    Member:
    #193654
    Messages:
    106
    The controller determines the number of digits shown, not the sensor. The sensor is an analog device that must be controlled and interpreted by the gauge or controller box. Either sensor can be read to the hundredths position, but that doesn't mean those digits are accurate.

    A lot of the mainstream gauge products (AEM, Innovate, PLX, etc.) were updated to use the new LSU 4.9 sensor a while ago. It's still worth verifying which sensor you're getting, but the major players are all on the 4.9 now. For what it's worth I think the AEM X-Series is probably the best option for most situations.
     
    Torspd[QUOTED] likes this.
  10. Dec 4, 2016 at 12:18 PM
    #10
    Torspd

    Torspd Tor-nication

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2009
    Member:
    #22958
    Messages:
    25,682
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Tor
    The Great America!
    Vehicle:
    MMVI 4.4L 4x4 Access Cab
    Torspd Custom Turbo kit [] Borg Warner 9180EFR Turbo [] Haltech Elite 2500 [] TiAL Q BOV [] TiAL V44 Wastegate @ 15psi [] CP Pistons [] CP Carrillo Rods [] ARP Head studs [] ARP Main Studs [] ARP Header - Head Studs [] Ported Heads w/ 1mm oversized valves intake/exhaust [] Brian Crower Forged Stroker Crank [] Darton M.I.D. Sleeved Block [] Kelford Camshafts [] Torspd 160* T-stat mod [] APR Large Fuel Rail [] Walbro 460 LPH E85 Fuel Pump [] FueLab FPR [] APR T56 Conversion Kit [] KP RACING Built T56 [] McLeod Racing Custom Twin Disk Clutch [] One Piece Aluminum Driveshaft [] MGW Shifter [] Custom lowering kit [] Ohlins Front Coilovers [] QA1rear shocks [] Custom Ron Davis Radiator [] Dual SPAL Electric Fans []
    @Construct got my mind working. Since I honestly didn't know the main points between the two versions sensors. Having the older version of the AEM with the LSU 4.2 sensor, I was thinking it was along the lines of the newer 4.9, but only due to the fact that it is a plug in play setup. As in, you don't do a free air calibration setup with it, versus the process used by say the older Innovate wideband kits. Those came with a free air calibration button, and required the sensor to be removed from the exhaust stream, to get an accurate calibration. The AEM, was install and go. Which means that it did its own calibration at power on, since the sensor was still the same. At least what I can deduce. I haven't looked up the instructions to verify my inference.

    After looking at another thread, I came across some explanatory information.


    Quote,"Grams UEGO – wideband air fuel gauge utilizes the Bosch LSU 4.9 sensor which is superior to the LSU 4.2 sensors. One major difference between the LSU 4.9 and LSU 4.2 is the LSU 4.9 uses the reference pumping-current, while the LSU 4.2 uses the reference air. This allows the LSU 4.9 to get rid of the reference air, and therefore remove the biggest failure mode; as a result the LSU 4.9 has a long life and maintains accuracy throughout the life of the sensor

    Most aftermarket wideband controllers still use the LSU 4.2, mainly for low cost reasons. Bosch sells the LSU 4.2 to the aftermarket at a much lower price than the LSU 4.9, plus, many of the controllers are not able to adapt to the new LSU 4.9 as the technology is different. In fact, most all OEM who use Bosch sensors are using the LSU 4.9." End quote.

    From here: http://cms.gramsperformance.com/id/963/Grams-Wideband-AirFuel-Ratio-Gauge/

    Thank you @Construct
     
    Biscuits[OP] likes this.

Products Discussed in

To Top