1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Need help with lift on 2005 Tacoma

Discussion in '2nd Gen. Tacomas (2005-2015)' started by kayman210, May 6, 2017.

  1. May 6, 2017 at 7:53 PM
    #1
    kayman210

    kayman210 [OP] Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2017
    Member:
    #216540
    Messages:
    19
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Kevin
    Vehicle:
    2005 White Tacoma TRD, 2007 Black 4Runner
    Hi all -

    I've been scouring this forum for a while trying to figure out how to lift our 05 tacoma. We just got 265/75/16 BFG ATs and ordered bilstein 5100 adjustables for the front and a 2" tuff country AAL for the rear.

    Here's what I'm having trouble with - do I set the front Bilsteins at 1.75 or 2.5"?

    Here's how it sits with stock suspension and the new BFG 265/75/16 tires:

    Front: 34.5" ground to fender across the center of the wheel
    Rear: 36.25" ground to fender across center of wheel.

    So with 2.5" Bilstein in the front and presumably 2" from the TuffCountry AAL in the rear I should be sitting at 37" in the front and 38.25 in the rear.

    Couple questions - has anyone used this exact setup and can confirm that these are the results I will get?

    Is 2.5" too much without new UCAs? It seems like everyone has a different opinion on this.

    Would 1.75 in the front (36.25") and 2" AAL in the rear (38.25") give me too much rake?

    Am I doing these measurements right?


    Thank you for your insight!
     
  2. May 6, 2017 at 8:12 PM
    #2
    LocoLocal

    LocoLocal Aspiring Polymath

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2013
    Member:
    #107668
    Messages:
    5,209
    Gender:
    Male
    39.081221472127545, -77.45538862919935
    Vehicle:
    Large American
    2.5 is generally where you would need to start looking into new UCAs. You don't have to get them at that height, but getting an alignment close to spec may be difficult. Anything higher and they're pretty much required.

    It depends on what look you are going for with your truck. I like a level look, so I have (in the past, not on this truck yet) lifted the front more than the rear. I personally would not lift the rear more than the front, but that's up to you.
     
  3. May 6, 2017 at 8:22 PM
    #3
    kayman210

    kayman210 [OP] Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2017
    Member:
    #216540
    Messages:
    19
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Kevin
    Vehicle:
    2005 White Tacoma TRD, 2007 Black 4Runner
    I can't afford to do new UCAs at the moment so I guess I should stick with the Bilsteins at 1.75" in the front. That should give me 2" of rake, I think that will look okay but not sure.
     
  4. May 7, 2017 at 5:06 AM
    #4
    Alexely999

    Alexely999 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2016
    Member:
    #175203
    Messages:
    2,157
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Alex
    Bay Area, CA
    Vehicle:
    2015 DCSB 4X4
    stock rake is usually around 2" so I think it will look okay.

    If you decide to go for 2.5" lift you may or may not need the new UCAs. Just be prepared if you do.
     
  5. May 7, 2017 at 6:01 AM
    #5
    randomguy

    randomguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2014
    Member:
    #130062
    Messages:
    501
    Gender:
    Male
    The Dalles, OR
    Vehicle:
    17 T4R 4x4 MGM
    If you have a canopy you probably won't get the full 2" out of the AAL. They sag after a while anyways.
     
    Alexely999 likes this.
  6. May 17, 2017 at 8:04 PM
    #6
    kayman210

    kayman210 [OP] Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2017
    Member:
    #216540
    Messages:
    19
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Kevin
    Vehicle:
    2005 White Tacoma TRD, 2007 Black 4Runner

Products Discussed in

To Top