1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Reading Sidewalls

Discussion in 'Wheels & Tires' started by wingspar, Feb 6, 2018.

  1. Feb 6, 2018 at 9:10 PM
    #1
    wingspar

    wingspar [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Member:
    #59895
    Messages:
    326
    Gender:
    Male
    Oregon
    Vehicle:
    2011 Tacoma 4x4 Access Cab
    My old tires I just replaced were 4 ply tires according to the place I bought them from. I’ve looked at the tires several times, and I can not find any info about 4 ply or C load, E load or anything else. Do any of the photos below tell anyone what load they are?

    at3_tire_info_01_4759.jpg

    at3_tire_info_04_4760.jpg

    at3_tire_info_05_4761.jpg
     
  2. Feb 6, 2018 at 9:17 PM
    #2
    Matmo215

    Matmo215 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2016
    Member:
    #197333
    Messages:
    7,646
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Matthew
    Waco, TX
    Vehicle:
    2015 Sport DCSB
    Im no expert but there is an E by the load info, could be an E rated tire
     
  3. Feb 7, 2018 at 1:06 AM
    #3
    splitbolt

    splitbolt Voodoo Witch Doctor

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Member:
    #32761
    Messages:
    7,873
    Gender:
    Male
    NW Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    2016 TRD OFFROAD DCSB MGM
    The load rating of your old tire is a ISO/ETRTO metric 112 Standard Load. Your old tire is constructed of 5 body plies and 2 sidewall plies.

    The old ply system applied to bias plies for strength; more plies>more strength>more ability to hold higher pressure>higher load rating.

    Modern LT tires with radial plies, in the C(6ply), D(8ply), E(10ply) rating, do not actually contain that number of plies. They are often constructed with the same number of body and sidewall plies as your old tire; just tougher, thicker materials. Modern LT tires are often listed with the ISO/ETRTO load rating number; see chart below.

    Your old tire had a max load of 2,469 lbs.
    P metric and ISO/ETRTO metric tires are derated for use on trucks and SUVs by a factor of 1.1.
    2,469/1.1=2,245

    Compared to a similar sized LT-metric, in either a C, D or E load rating; 48 psi would obtain a 2,269 lb load rating.

    Basically, your old tire is comparable to a C load/6 ply LT-metric, in the same size.

    Notice, it cross references the ISO/ETRO load ratings; C(110), D(117), E(121).

    tire2.jpg
     
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2018
  4. Feb 7, 2018 at 2:26 AM
    #4
    IronPeak

    IronPeak PermaLurker

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2016
    Member:
    #180799
    Messages:
    3,232
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    AuggieX
    Back to Back
    Vehicle:
    2007 sr5 4x4 DCLB/2015 TRD sport 4x4 DCLB sold
    Bigger Taller Slower
    These are not LT tires, the post above puts them at c load rating. I disagree, and so does coopers website. these are STD LOAD range, or passenger tires, STD is below C.

    Says standard load right on the tire.

    Shown is coopers site, with both sizes in LT, and passenger. 112 corresponds to the thinner weaker tire., specs show load designation. Plus max psi 44lbs, lol
    http://us.coopertire.com/tires/discoverer-a-t3-suv.aspx
    Also these tires are quite old at 4 years. manufactured in March of 14. Tire lose grip as the chemicals that make it pliable evaporate over time. They dry out. Not worth much, let them go.
    screengrab-1517999000712.jpg screengrab-1517998967992.jpg
     
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2018
    wingspar[OP] and ovrlndkull like this.
  5. Feb 7, 2018 at 2:53 AM
    #5
    IronPeak

    IronPeak PermaLurker

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2016
    Member:
    #180799
    Messages:
    3,232
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    AuggieX
    Back to Back
    Vehicle:
    2007 sr5 4x4 DCLB/2015 TRD sport 4x4 DCLB sold
    Bigger Taller Slower
    Says "standard load " right on them. /thread. Plus the 44psi max should tell you something
     
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2018
    ovrlndkull likes this.
  6. Feb 7, 2018 at 3:10 AM
    #6
    ovrlndkull

    ovrlndkull STUKASFK - HC4LIFE

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2017
    Member:
    #206806
    Messages:
    37,791
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Skip
    Burlington, NC
    Vehicle:
    2005 DCLB Silver
    63s, XD Machete, Beat not Babied
    wingspar[OP] and IronPeak like this.
  7. Feb 7, 2018 at 8:42 AM
    #7
    splitbolt

    splitbolt Voodoo Witch Doctor

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Member:
    #32761
    Messages:
    7,873
    Gender:
    Male
    NW Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    2016 TRD OFFROAD DCSB MGM
    I did not say, 'they are an LT' or 'lesser than', 'greater than' or 'equivelant' to a C load rating.
    I said they are "comparable to"...

    I think you have a misunderstanding of the entirety of my post and what I was trying to convey.

    Here's a 265/70/17 graphed in P-metric SL, P-metric XL, C, D, E.
    Can we agree it's an accurate representation of the relationship between them all?

    Truncatedcharts1.jpg
     
    wingspar[OP] likes this.
  8. Feb 7, 2018 at 8:51 AM
    #8
    ovrlndkull

    ovrlndkull STUKASFK - HC4LIFE

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2017
    Member:
    #206806
    Messages:
    37,791
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Skip
    Burlington, NC
    Vehicle:
    2005 DCLB Silver
    63s, XD Machete, Beat not Babied
    The load rating of a high load index or the XL P rating can be equal to that of an LT C load range you are correct in saying this. Where the LT comes into play is the rubber compounds, belts, inner carcass, the apex of the sidewall and how the tire beads are made. Also usually with LT tires you have more than 10/32 of tread which is the box standard for P metric. So yes they do have some equivalency to a C load range but only in their load carrying capacity.

    For the OP where you find the load index is that # 112T whith all the inflation specs and weight carrying specs of the tire.
     
    wingspar[OP] likes this.
  9. Feb 7, 2018 at 8:52 AM
    #9
    Noelie84

    Noelie84 What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2013
    Member:
    #112264
    Messages:
    27,281
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Noel
    Wales, Maine
    Vehicle:
    '15 Ram 2500 Land Barge
    8.5 Fisher XV2, some switches, some lights.

    Your tires are a standard load tire (4 ply equivalent. This means that the tire is capable of supporting the same amount of weight as a traditional 4 ply nylon-only bias-ply tire)
    The 112 means that they are rated for a maximum of 2469lbs (as stated immediately afterward) at a maximum pressure of 44psi.
    The T after it means that they are rated for a maximum safe speed of 118mph.
    The E11 means that they are registered for use in Europe.
    The DOT code breaks down as follows: UT is the identifier for which plant they were made in. C2 is the manufacturer's tire sizing code. 1A6 is the manufacturer's brand identifier. The 1114 means that they were built in the 11th week of 2014.

    Edit-
    265 means that when mounted on a wheel and inflated the tire will measure 265mm from sidewall to sidewall (the section width)
    70 means that the sidewall height when mounted and inflated will be 70% of that 265mm (or roughly 185mm in your case)
    16 is the rim diameter, in inches.

    But you probably already knew that part. :notsure:
     
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2018
    ovrlndkull likes this.
  10. Feb 7, 2018 at 8:56 AM
    #10
    ovrlndkull

    ovrlndkull STUKASFK - HC4LIFE

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2017
    Member:
    #206806
    Messages:
    37,791
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Skip
    Burlington, NC
    Vehicle:
    2005 DCLB Silver
    63s, XD Machete, Beat not Babied
    What he said^^^
     
  11. Feb 8, 2018 at 4:44 PM
    #11
    wingspar

    wingspar [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Member:
    #59895
    Messages:
    326
    Gender:
    Male
    Oregon
    Vehicle:
    2011 Tacoma 4x4 Access Cab
    Thank you everyone. Even after reading this thread and looking at all the links, it remains confusing to me as to how to read sidewalls. However, my suspicions that these tires were not what I originally wanted are confirmed. It’s probably a wonder that I got 20k miles, mostly logging roads, out of these tires. 4 ply tires, or “P” tires just don’t belong out there and I knew that when I bought these. I ordered 10 ply tires and they sold me 4 ply tires. I got sick of fixing flats. By the way, I just replaced them with some Cooper ST Maxx’s with a load rating of E.

    Now, I grew up with 4 ply, 6 ply and so on. These C, D, E ratings are new to me.
     
    splitbolt and IronPeak like this.
  12. Feb 11, 2018 at 11:55 AM
    #12
    Fordconvert

    Fordconvert Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2016
    Member:
    #202748
    Messages:
    55
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    1997 Tacoma 5 lug low SAS
    SAS, Wallet lightening mod
    This on the same lines as reading side walls, but concerning the born on date. How old of a tire would you guys be willing to run?
     
  13. Feb 12, 2018 at 5:20 AM
    #13
    Noelie84

    Noelie84 What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2013
    Member:
    #112264
    Messages:
    27,281
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Noel
    Wales, Maine
    Vehicle:
    '15 Ram 2500 Land Barge
    8.5 Fisher XV2, some switches, some lights.
    Depends on how it's been stored. If it's been in a central hub warehouse then it's been in a climate-controlled environment and out of the sun; they can go 10 years without any degradation. But if some parts store has kept them in an uninsulated trailer out back, 5 or 6 years is about as old as I'd go.
    But, keep in mind that Manufacturer's warranties start from the moment they're installed on your vehicle, NOT when they're produced. So as long as you keep your install paperwork it doesn't matter how old they are, they're still covered under warranty. Most tire companies go 5-6 years for manufacturer's defect warranties, which is longer than a set is likely to last on the average daily driver.
     
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2018
    Fordconvert[QUOTED] likes this.
  14. Feb 17, 2018 at 6:52 AM
    #14
    ovrlndkull

    ovrlndkull STUKASFK - HC4LIFE

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2017
    Member:
    #206806
    Messages:
    37,791
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Skip
    Burlington, NC
    Vehicle:
    2005 DCLB Silver
    63s, XD Machete, Beat not Babied
    Most manuf pull tires out of circulation if they are just sitting in their warehouse for 2yrs. This is spot on advice!
     
  15. Feb 20, 2018 at 8:03 AM
    #15
    Noelie84

    Noelie84 What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2013
    Member:
    #112264
    Messages:
    27,281
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Noel
    Wales, Maine
    Vehicle:
    '15 Ram 2500 Land Barge
    8.5 Fisher XV2, some switches, some lights.
    Yes and no. We've gotten deliveries from Goodyear before that had tires that were already 3+ years old. But, generally they try to catch those before they go out to a distributor, you're correct.
    However, individual distributors are a different story entirely; once they get inventory in they can't really send it back to the manufacturer for being 'too old' so for odd sizes/models it's not uncommon to run across 4 or 5 year old DOT's that were delivered to the retail store yesterday, lol. But, distributors keep their tires in the controlled environments I mentioned above, so they're still essentially the same as the day they came out of the mold. :notsure:
     
    ovrlndkull[QUOTED] likes this.

Products Discussed in

To Top