1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Will 31s or 32s be too heavy on 2.7 auto 4x4

Discussion in '3rd Gen. Tacomas (2016-2023)' started by Bugna510, Oct 2, 2018.

  1. Oct 2, 2018 at 11:31 AM
    #1
    Bugna510

    Bugna510 [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2018
    Member:
    #259705
    Messages:
    146
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Brandon
    SW WASHINGTON
    Vehicle:
    ‘21 TRD OR DCSB 6MT
    Stock
    Hey guys. I have a 2018 taco SR
    2.7 auto 4x4 access cab. I’ve decided not to go with 33s as it’s just too much tire for me but I still want to go with 31s or possibly 32s. I will be getting new suspension and leveling kit 3” in front 1” in rear. Also new wheels instead of the OEM, probably the American racing Baja wheels 16”. Do you think I will have a noticeable decrease in power or increase in weight felt when I put on 31s or 32s?
    I’d like some photos of you guys with 2.7s that run 31s or 32s as id like to see how it will look.

    I’m sure I’ll feel a little something but I want to know what you guys have experienced before I go ahead and make the call. Your input is greatly appreciated, and yes I know it may be a noob question but I am a so called noob when it comes to these trucks especially in a 2.7
     
  2. Oct 2, 2018 at 11:35 AM
    #2
    six1five

    six1five Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2017
    Member:
    #225274
    Messages:
    170
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Kunal
    Nashville, TN
    17 SR AC 4x4 2.7L MT
    I run 265/75/16 Cooper AT34S’ on my 2017 SR 2.7 MT 4x4. Didn’t notice a difference in power. I’m not running any lift.
     
    Bugna510[OP] likes this.
  3. Oct 2, 2018 at 11:37 AM
    #3
    upTOPOverland_Drew

    upTOPOverland_Drew upTOP Overland Technical Design and Application

    Joined:
    May 22, 2016
    Member:
    #187612
    Messages:
    2,708
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Drew
    Littleton, CO
    Vehicle:
    2017 TRD OR DCSB SUPER WHITE
    All the things...click the link in sig
    you can easily get away with 265/75r16
     
    Bugna510[OP] likes this.
  4. Oct 2, 2018 at 11:39 AM
    #4
    Bugna510

    Bugna510 [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2018
    Member:
    #259705
    Messages:
    146
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Brandon
    SW WASHINGTON
    Vehicle:
    ‘21 TRD OR DCSB 6MT
    Stock

    And no need for regearing or anything like that?
     
  5. Oct 2, 2018 at 11:40 AM
    #5
    Bugna510

    Bugna510 [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2018
    Member:
    #259705
    Messages:
    146
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Brandon
    SW WASHINGTON
    Vehicle:
    ‘21 TRD OR DCSB 6MT
    Stock

    And you didn’t need to regear? Would it look alright if I lift it too or is there going to be some goofy gap
     
  6. Oct 2, 2018 at 11:40 AM
    #6
    upTOPOverland_Drew

    upTOPOverland_Drew upTOP Overland Technical Design and Application

    Joined:
    May 22, 2016
    Member:
    #187612
    Messages:
    2,708
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Drew
    Littleton, CO
    Vehicle:
    2017 TRD OR DCSB SUPER WHITE
    All the things...click the link in sig
    not at all, the weight will not be that different as long as you stay with a SL or P rated tire
     
  7. Oct 2, 2018 at 11:47 AM
    #7
    T4RFTMFW

    T4RFTMFW Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2014
    Member:
    #134525
    Messages:
    69,788
    Slightly slower to accelerate and you’ll probably notice a hit in fuel economy.

    Stay with a P metric tire if you’re able to - tire weight is the big killer for 2.7s with the auto trans.

    I went from P245 to P265 and lost 20% of my fuel economy with the 2.7 auto. Our trucks weigh about the same (I had a DCSB Prerunner).
     
    Mr-Paul and Bugna510[OP] like this.
  8. Oct 2, 2018 at 12:20 PM
    #8
    Bugna510

    Bugna510 [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2018
    Member:
    #259705
    Messages:
    146
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Brandon
    SW WASHINGTON
    Vehicle:
    ‘21 TRD OR DCSB 6MT
    Stock
    So you definitely saw a big difference in gas mileage. What about acceleration / holding speed on the freeway
     
  9. Oct 2, 2018 at 12:24 PM
    #9
    DriverSound

    DriverSound Señor Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Member:
    #15329
    Messages:
    5,851
    Gender:
    Male
    Oregon
    Vehicle:
    2015 DCSB OR 4x4
    Too few to list.
    Going to 265/75R16 from 245/75R16 isn't that much of a difference. Like someone else said, you'll notice a slight change in acceleration and a bigger change in mpg. Freeway speed is not an issue. I went from 20/24+ mpg to 17/21 and I kept the stock weight vs aftermarket wheels/tires weight the same.
     
  10. Oct 2, 2018 at 12:27 PM
    #10
    SpeySquatch

    SpeySquatch Function over Form

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2018
    Member:
    #246516
    Messages:
    7,366
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2016 TRD OR DCSB
    C4Fab LoPro, BAMF Sliders, Ext ADS 2.5’s, 4.88's, OVTune (OG to KDMax)
    run 235, 245, or 255 width and you should be fine
     
  11. Oct 2, 2018 at 1:58 PM
    #11
    T4RFTMFW

    T4RFTMFW Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2014
    Member:
    #134525
    Messages:
    69,788
    Only time it ever sucks was hills.

    Elevation made it worse, I had times where I was on the floor with the pedal and still dropping speeds, even under 40 MPH.
     
  12. Oct 2, 2018 at 1:59 PM
    #12
    T4RFTMFW

    T4RFTMFW Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2014
    Member:
    #134525
    Messages:
    69,788
    This.

    On my next rig I went with 255s, I’d go that route before a 265 if you have a 2.7 auto on stock gears.

    I went with Cooper Discovery ATPs in 255 and loved them, good weight and tread pattern. Still available in P rated which helps a lot with the 2.7.
     
    SpeySquatch[QUOTED] likes this.
  13. Oct 2, 2018 at 2:09 PM
    #13
    Pat3002t

    Pat3002t Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2017
    Member:
    #238951
    Messages:
    100
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    3rd gen SR 2.7 5MT
    Some good info in here. 2.7 4x4 manual ac myself. A little wider is great and I’ll be looking for a 255 when it’s time just wondering how much taller of a tire can I get in there? Stock sr. Some extra height and clearance to compliment a future lift will be greatly appreciated.
     
  14. Oct 2, 2018 at 2:10 PM
    #14
    T4RFTMFW

    T4RFTMFW Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2014
    Member:
    #134525
    Messages:
    69,788
    255/75/17

    There’s a handy tire size calculator @tcBob has here.
     
    Pat3002t[QUOTED] likes this.
  15. Oct 2, 2018 at 2:12 PM
    #15
    jowybyo

    jowybyo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2013
    Member:
    #116863
    Messages:
    6,092
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Joe
    Baltimore, MD
    Vehicle:
    '14 MGM DCSB Postrunner 4wd Conversion, Debadged
    Same with me. Lift, added armor, converting to 4wd made hardly no difference. Going up a tire size (255/85 Load E) made my truck very sluggish and took my fuel economy from about ~23mpg to about ~17mpg. I regeared to 4.88's and it's still very sluggish with these tires.
     
    T4RFTMFW[QUOTED] likes this.
  16. Oct 2, 2018 at 2:45 PM
    #16
    Bugna510

    Bugna510 [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2018
    Member:
    #259705
    Messages:
    146
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Brandon
    SW WASHINGTON
    Vehicle:
    ‘21 TRD OR DCSB 6MT
    Stock

    Does the width have to do much with the regearing? What makes you say stick with the 235-255
     
  17. Oct 2, 2018 at 2:50 PM
    #17
    SpeySquatch

    SpeySquatch Function over Form

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2018
    Member:
    #246516
    Messages:
    7,366
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2016 TRD OR DCSB
    C4Fab LoPro, BAMF Sliders, Ext ADS 2.5’s, 4.88's, OVTune (OG to KDMax)
    Much lighter! You only need to regear when the engine is suffering from too much weight, or you want the gearing to provide better torque response. I would never run 285's on my (v6) truck because they actually take away from the engine power because they are significantly heavier...guys do this for looks, but don't actually gain much function. I use to have a 4 banger and 245's were great on it. Many people will differ in their opinion of tires, but skinnier tires perform VERY well. Skinny tires are light, cut through snow well, and steer better on ice. You can get alot of height to of a tire without increasing weight (sometime reducing it) by going .5-1" skinnier and you won't notice difference in performance unless you are going through deep mud.
     
    Last edited: Oct 2, 2018
    Woofer2609 likes this.
  18. Oct 2, 2018 at 2:53 PM
    #18
    ST77

    ST77 Wandering doesn't mean you're lost

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Member:
    #16048
    Messages:
    2,851
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Brian
    Sandy, Or
    Vehicle:
    2018 TRD OR DCSB
    Bone Stock
    I’d be looking at load range C, that’ll cut a ton of weight.
     
  19. Oct 2, 2018 at 3:00 PM
    #19
    SpeySquatch

    SpeySquatch Function over Form

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2018
    Member:
    #246516
    Messages:
    7,366
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2016 TRD OR DCSB
    C4Fab LoPro, BAMF Sliders, Ext ADS 2.5’s, 4.88's, OVTune (OG to KDMax)
    2" lift max before it starts to look weird
     
  20. Oct 2, 2018 at 3:01 PM
    #20
    SpeySquatch

    SpeySquatch Function over Form

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2018
    Member:
    #246516
    Messages:
    7,366
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2016 TRD OR DCSB
    C4Fab LoPro, BAMF Sliders, Ext ADS 2.5’s, 4.88's, OVTune (OG to KDMax)
    Good to know. Exactly why I chose 255/75/17. 38lbs per tire vs the 52lbs my Falken AT3's in 265/75/16
     

Products Discussed in

To Top