1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

245/75/16 E vs 265/70/16 E on a 2.7

Discussion in '4 Cylinder' started by Nate31, Apr 11, 2019.

  1. Apr 11, 2019 at 7:11 PM
    #1
    Nate31

    Nate31 [OP] Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2019
    Member:
    #289727
    Messages:
    20
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2.7 Tacoma
    should I stick with 245/75/16 load range E or get 265/70/16 load range E on my 2.7 Tacoma, does anyone know how much difference it would make if any ?
     
  2. Apr 11, 2019 at 7:45 PM
    #2
    Tigerian

    Tigerian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2017
    Member:
    #233607
    Messages:
    1,377
    Gender:
    Male
    Iowa, unfortunately
    Vehicle:
    2024 GR Corolla
    Any time you increase the size/weight of the tires there will be a difference. Less fuel economy, slower acceleration. The bigger the change in tire, the more drastic the affects.

    It all depends on what you want out of your truck. Is there a particular reason you want to switch to 265/70?
     
  3. Apr 11, 2019 at 7:48 PM
    #3
    Nate31

    Nate31 [OP] Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2019
    Member:
    #289727
    Messages:
    20
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2.7 Tacoma
    Well I’m getting a 2 inch leveling kit for it so I want a tire that’s alittle bigger
     
  4. Apr 11, 2019 at 9:34 PM
    #4
    slow TURD I4

    slow TURD I4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2018
    Member:
    #274364
    Messages:
    297
    Gender:
    Male
    SD
    Vehicle:
    2018 DCSB 2.7
    Not to hijack but I have the question... but I went from stock steel wheels to some Scs rays. The Scs weight a few pounds less than the steelies so if I decide to make the same tire change that OP is wanting to possibly do, would the weight difference make up for the tire size and = minimal mpg loss?
     
  5. Apr 12, 2019 at 6:18 AM
    #5
    BillsSR5

    BillsSR5 Looking out for #1

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2017
    Member:
    #216032
    Messages:
    8,654
    First Name:
    bill
    Vehicle:
    2014 SR5
    why do you need a E rated tire for?
     
  6. Apr 12, 2019 at 6:34 AM
    #6
    Marshall R

    Marshall R Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2015
    Member:
    #156224
    Messages:
    4,780
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Marshall
    Vehicle:
    07 White TRD double cab
    none
    The tires are the same height. The 265/70/16 is about 1" wider. I've run both sizes on my Tacoma and couldn't tell any difference. I've also ran 265/75/16's which are about 1" taller and couldn't tell any difference. I've run both P and E series tires. No difference in ride, performance or fuel mileage. Just looks.

    I do have the 4.0 but can't imagine you're going to see any difference with the 2.7 either.

    If you want a slightly bigger tire you want 265/75/16's instead of 245/75/16's or 265/70/16's. They will be 1" taller and 1" wider than the 245/75/16's. And you don't need a lift, that size will fit a stock truck. A 285/75/16 will need a small lift.

    What is your gear ratio? I'm not as familiar with the 2.7's. Virtually all 4.0's have 3.73 gears and aren't terribly affected by small increases in tire size. I'm thinking the 2.7's have 4.10's which will be even better. If it is less than 4.10 then you might have some noticeable power loss.
     
  7. Apr 13, 2019 at 6:31 AM
    #7
    That one old guy

    That one old guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2019
    Member:
    #286340
    Messages:
    1,253
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Chuck
    Vehicle:
    08 Base 4x4 2.7 Access 5spd
    Stockish
    I don't see how a you'd notice a difference. Super slight if you notice it at all.

    Diameter inches (mm) 30.47 (773.9) 30.61 (777.4) 0.14 (3.5) 0.5%
    Width inches (mm)
    9.65 (245) 10.43 (265) 0.79 (20) 8.2%
    Circum. inches (mm)
    95.72 (2431.28) 96.15 (2442.27) 0.43 (11) 0.5%
    Sidewall Height inches (mm)
    7.23 (183.75) 7.3 (185.5) 0.07 (1.75) 1%
    Revolutions per mile (km)
    661.93 (411.31) 658.95 (409.45) -2.98 (-1.85) -0.5%


    Speedometer Difference
    Speedo Reading Actual Speed
    20 mph (32.19 km/h) 20.09 mph (32.33 km/h)
    25 mph (40.23 km/h) 25.11 mph (40.42 km/h)
    30 mph (48.28 km/h) 30.14 mph (48.5 km/h)
    35 mph (56.33 km/h) 35.16 mph (56.58 km/h)
    40 mph (64.37 km/h) 40.18 mph (64.67 km/h)
    45 mph (72.42 km/h) 45.2 mph (72.75 km/h)
    50 mph (80.47 km/h) 50.23 mph (80.83 km/h)
    55 mph (88.51 km/h) 55.25 mph (88.91 km/h)
    60 mph (96.56 km/h) 60.27 mph (97 km/h)
    65 mph (104.61 km/h) 65.29 mph (105.08 km/h)
    Speedometer forum embed code: [​IMG]
    Gear Ratio / RPMs for New Tire (@ 65 mph)
    2.35 2.73 2.94 3.07 3.21 3.31 3.42 3.55 3.73 3.91 4.11 4.27 4.56 4.88 5.13 5.29 5.38 5.71 6.17 7.17
    1677 1948 2098 2191 2291 2362 2440 2533 2662 2790 2933 3047 3254 3482 3661 3775 3839 4075 4403 5116
    Take into consideration the above ^^^^ numbers @65 mph are 1:1 trans ratio and not overdrive.

    I went from 245/75/16 to 265/70/17 on my 2.7 (5sp) and there was a small noticeable difference.
     
  8. Apr 15, 2019 at 10:53 AM
    #8
    TYetti

    TYetti 4cylinders of awesomeness

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2014
    Member:
    #124858
    Messages:
    2,343
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Mat
    Abbotsford, BC, Canada
    Vehicle:
    09 Tacoma AC 2.7L 5spd 4x4
    Just put 35s on it'll be fine I promise
     
  9. Apr 18, 2019 at 6:01 AM
    #9
    Greenbean

    Greenbean B.S. Goodwrench

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2012
    Member:
    #84332
    Messages:
    3,253
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Zack
    Western NC
    Vehicle:
    2015 AC 2.7L 5-spd 4x4 Utility Package
    For the money and since your going to be “leveled” I’d look at the 265/75/R16s. It’s going to be a touch cheaper than any 265/70 as the 75 aspect ratio is LOTS more common.

    I have a 3rd Gen OR suspension under my 2015 and it raised my front about 1.4” or so and I run a 265/75/R16, 4-ply.

    6F74AFE3-A84B-4010-ACD8-55BECE9AB9A3.jpg
     
    mistermanny likes this.

Products Discussed in

To Top