1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Ultragauge/Scan Gauge owners report

Discussion in '1st Gen. Tacomas (1995-2004)' started by freshman, Sep 22, 2010.

  1. Sep 22, 2010 at 11:41 PM
    #21
    Manlaan

    Manlaan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2010
    Member:
    #30054
    Messages:
    1,027
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Greg
    Riverton, Utah
    Vehicle:
    2002 XtraCab SR5 V6 4x4 Black
    See Signature
    that could very easily be the case, as when you're engine braking, you'll not be using any fuel, but you'll also be slowing down considerably since the axle is basically powering the engine. When in neutral, you've disconnected the axle from the engine, so you no longer have all that extra drag to maintain speed (on declines). Coasting (and maintaining speed) is by far best out of gear, while slowing down is by far best in gear. Its really not a one or the other for normal driving, but when to use each one.

    Both methods can be used for mpg savings although the engine braking method seems to do more overall due to the driver planning their stops a lot better (slower stops means less energy was used to get up to/maintain speed, therefore less is wasted when pressing the brakes)

    Some of the more dedicated people actually kill the engine when they put it in neutral and pop the clutch to get it started again, but the wear and tear on the clutch and trans makes it so not worth the mpg savings in my book.
     
  2. Sep 23, 2010 at 5:15 PM
    #22
    MowTaco

    MowTaco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Member:
    #22530
    Messages:
    3,814
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Matt
    Kansas
    Vehicle:
    16 Chevrolet Silverado
    Mine still reads higher just coasting in neutral rather than shifting down to say 3rd going 40-50 mph. I don't know if the Torque app would say "infinite" but like I said the highest I've seen was 191 mpg.
     
  3. Sep 24, 2010 at 1:46 PM
    #23
    08pretaco

    08pretaco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2008
    Member:
    #9502
    Messages:
    9,314
    Gender:
    Male
    az
    Vehicle:
    2014 Tundra 4x4 CM 5.7L SR5
    @ADSracingshocks - F 3 point ohh / R 2.5 - w/clickers @camburgracing - uniball UCA @rigidindustries - 40" amber/white split, Dually XL, D2 @coopertires - 35/12.5/17 STT MAXX @bayareametalfab - low pro bed rack @toyotausa - 17" rock warrior @sdhqoffroad - rock sliders, a-pillar @hondogarage / @apple / @gaiagps / @dualgps- navigation @wheelersoffroadinc - superbumps
    Just a bit of info for those 4 bangers running larger tires...maybe try going a little quicker on your freeway driving and see how it goes. For me and my 33.1" tires im driving around 68~70 for optimal fuel economy :D
     
  4. Sep 25, 2010 at 7:55 AM
    #24
    twfsa

    twfsa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Member:
    #37997
    Messages:
    1,338
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Tom
    Omaha Ne
    Vehicle:
    04 TRD 4X4
    881 Front coils, Bilstien 5100's all the way front set to "0" Icon Dynamic's mini leafs in rear, stock tires.

Products Discussed in

To Top