1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Oversized Tire Dilemma

Discussion in 'Wheels & Tires' started by rower1138, Mar 18, 2021.

  1. Mar 18, 2021 at 10:51 AM
    #1
    rower1138

    rower1138 [OP] Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2021
    Member:
    #358656
    Messages:
    6
    Gender:
    Female
    First Name:
    Cassie
    Vehicle:
    2017 Toyota Tacoma Off Road
    Hey guys! Just bought a 2017 Taco Off Road. I absolutely love it so far and plan on making plenty of changes, particularly build a platform and storage in back. Now the truck already has a two inch leveling kit but has oversized tires: Toyo Open Country 285/75/16. I bought this car out of state without seeing it aside from photos, and I realized how huge the tires were, once I got there. I am not currently planning on making my truck into a rock crawler or anything of that sort. I typically find myself on NFS roads, that having the added height is nice but not sure at this cost currently. For reference, I’ve been driving Subaru Outbacks for 13 years.

    Here’s my dilemma: I don’t think I need such large tires when the standard for this truck is 265/70/16. It is killing gas mileage (16mpg highway), it is a wind sail on high wind days (I live in WY so that is frequent), my turning radius is extremely diminished without abrasion issues on the A arm. I am not interested in lifting the truck currently.

    I just want some insight and opinions from others on oversized tires versus standard size A/Ts for this truck, as I do enjoy backroads but travel around the country frequently. I am trying to find the happy medium. I’ve traveled in this same exact Tacoma a few years back with no issues when it came to winds, turning radius, and great gas mileage at around 22mpg, all on stock tires from the dealership. Thanks in advance!!

    75267361-C267-4E00-AAC9-AF1A943FDF4E.jpg
     
  2. Mar 19, 2021 at 11:31 AM
    #2
    scs_vuth

    scs_vuth SCS sales rep

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2017
    Member:
    #209278
    Messages:
    481
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Vuth
    Bay Area, Ca
    Vehicle:
    2013 Tacoma - 2020 GX460 - 2022 Jeep Gladiator EcoDiesel
    Hello Cassie,

    Welcome to Tacoma World. For a happy medium, u can down size to a 265/75/16 AT tire size. This will bring you back closer to stock performance and keep that slightly aggressive look.


    :burnrubber:
     
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2021
  3. Mar 19, 2021 at 12:00 PM
    #3
    Gutentight

    Gutentight Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2020
    Member:
    #346218
    Messages:
    269
    Gender:
    Male
    IL
    Vehicle:
    2021 Cement Off-Road 4x4 DCSB 3.5L AT
    Welcome to the most expensive free membership in the world.

    Gas mileage shown on the truck will be a bit lower than reality since it doesn't know the tires have a larger circumference. But yes those tires are reducing the torque, adding mass to spin up and brake, and apparently rubbing.

    I have the Falken Wildpeak 265/75R16 in SL load, and really like them. Speedometer is actually more accurate than stock size. From your description I would recommend something like that. Your current tires are E load so dropping to an SL load range will cut about 10+ lbs per tire and ride softer. The 265/75R16 is what should be standard size, little change to acceleration/braking/shift points, no rubbing (stock rims, no wheel spacers), +0.5" ground clearance from stock.

    Looks like stock off-road rims and some lift. The tires shouldn't look ridiculous but around 2" lift they might look a bit small. Which if it happens to have a spacer lift .. for your situation it might be a nicer ride to remove that once the tires are switched.
     
    rower1138[OP] and photogr4x4 like this.
  4. Mar 19, 2021 at 3:21 PM
    #4
    JNG

    JNG Shitposter extraordinaire

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2018
    Member:
    #276264
    Messages:
    1,384
    Gender:
    Male
    Vehicle:
    2019 Silver TRD OR DCSB 4x4 AT P&T
    I do quite well with the factory size 265/70r16's on my Offroad. I of course am using a better tire than the stock GY tires.. Nice truck btw.
     
    rower1138[OP] likes this.
  5. Mar 19, 2021 at 9:59 PM
    #5
    photogr4x4

    photogr4x4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2015
    Member:
    #164438
    Messages:
    1,268
    Gender:
    Male
    Canada
    Vehicle:
    TRD OR
    Nada
    No harm in going to a smaller tire unless you want that tiny addition of ground clearance. Either go stock or get 265/75R16s which will be smaller and lighter than 285s. Great access cab by the way, I'm trading in for my second TRD OR access cab some time in May!
     
    rower1138[OP] likes this.
  6. Mar 20, 2021 at 2:55 PM
    #6
    JL8Jeff

    JL8Jeff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2018
    Member:
    #243662
    Messages:
    984
    First Name:
    Jeff
    Ewing, NJ
    Vehicle:
    2013 Tacoma reg cab
    OME 885/nitros, SPC UCA, 305/65/17, AAL
    I'm guessing you still have winter gas right now so even with stock tires, you most likely won't get close to 22 mpg (maybe 18-19). The cap adds weights as well as any other accessories and that will lower the mpg as well. I'd be really surprised if you could get 20 mpg in the summer with the stock size tires so you may want to wait and see how the truck does over the next 3 months before doing anything.
     
  7. Mar 20, 2021 at 3:03 PM
    #7
    Cudgel

    Cudgel “Tonka”

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Member:
    #214640
    Messages:
    4,307
    Gender:
    Male
    Live in: An Ocean of Plastic Trash
    Vehicle:
    2017 OR DCLB
    ICON8 Lift -285s. upTOPoverland rack.
    Drive them until they are worn out then decide.
     
  8. Mar 20, 2021 at 3:31 PM
    #8
    Marshall R

    Marshall R Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2015
    Member:
    #156224
    Messages:
    4,784
    Gender:
    Male
    First Name:
    Marshall
    Vehicle:
    07 White TRD double cab
    none
    265/75/16's are your answer. They will be about 1.2" shorter, and .8" narrower. They are about 1" taller than stock same width as stock. I think that is a good compromise. That means about .6" less ground clearance compared to what you have now, which is nothing. The narrower tire creates less rolling resistance and will get better fuel mileage. The narrower tire will also do better in Wyoming snow. 265/75/16's are also available in a lighter tire weighing closer to 40 lbs each vs the roughly 60 lbs each with what you have. They will cost a lot less too.

    Tread pattern effects fuel mileage too. If everything is equal more aggressive tires have more rolling resistance and will hurt fuel mileage somewhat. Everything is a compromise, I'm willing to give up a little fuel mileage in order to have a somewhat aggressive tread.

    Your truck will get a bit better fuel mileage, I get 18.5-20 mpg hwy depending on how/where I drive. The ride will improve and you'll feel noticeably more power. I doubt if 22 mpg with an AT tire is realistic. If you go to a street tire, or something like Michelins you might get there, but I can live with 18-20 mpg.

    I think they would still look good with the small lift you have. Going back to stock height may, or may not make any difference in fuel mileage. It depends on exactly what you have and how hard/expensive it would be to go back to stock. My gut feeling is that you won't see enough improvement in fuel mileage to justify the expense of converting back to stock height.
     

Products Discussed in

To Top