1. Welcome to Tacoma World!

    You are currently viewing as a guest! To get full-access, you need to register for a FREE account.

    As a registered member, you’ll be able to:
    • Participate in all Tacoma discussion topics
    • Communicate privately with other Tacoma owners from around the world
    • Post your own photos in our Members Gallery
    • Access all special features of the site

Bilstein 170/60 vs 255/70

Discussion in 'Suspension' started by Lostsheep, Aug 8, 2024.

  1. Aug 8, 2024 at 8:51 PM
    #1
    Lostsheep

    Lostsheep [OP] Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2014
    Member:
    #135869
    Messages:
    621
    Gender:
    Male
    NorCal
    Vehicle:
    2015 6spd 4x4 OR
    6112s and 5160 , Dakars , Superbumps x4 , u-bolt flip , All Pro Skids (hacked and raised) , 265/70R17 KO2s, SEMA wheels, couple of machined things here and there
    It’s time to do something about my rear shocks , the 5160s just aren’t the right length. I’m not looking to go with crazy high end shocks which let me play with custom valving so prefer something OTS.

    I don’t know which of the two valving options is best for my application. I have hd dakars , a shell , I tow a teardrop , and often have extra weight in the back. I’m leaning towards the higher rates fwiw.

    I have a couple of questions, which of the two rates is closer to the 5160s ? Which is closer to 5100s?

    What have you run and what was your experience? If you chime in on this one let me know your setup , springs, shell , towing, usage etc.

    Thanks yall.
     
    Chasespeed likes this.

Products Discussed in

To Top